Suppr超能文献

使用基于FCS评分的数据挖掘方法识别家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征患者。

Identifying Patients with Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome Using FCS Score-Based Data Mining Methods.

作者信息

Németh Ákos, Harangi Mariann, Daróczy Bálint, Juhász Lilla, Paragh György, Fülöp Péter

机构信息

Division of Metabolic Disorders, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.

Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 25;11(15):4311. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154311.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no exact data about the prevalence of familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) in Central Europe. We aimed to identify FCS patients using either the FCS score proposed by Moulin et al. or with data mining, and assessed the diagnostic applicability of the FCS score.

METHODS

Analyzing medical records of 1,342,124 patients, the FCS score of each patient was calculated. Based on the data of previously diagnosed FCS patients, we trained machine learning models to identify other features that may improve FCS score calculation.

RESULTS

We identified 26 patients with an FCS score of ≥10. From the trained models, boosting tree models and support vector machines performed the best for patient recognition with overall AUC above 0.95, while artificial neural networks accomplished above 0.8, indicating less efficacy. We identified laboratory features that can be considered as additions to the FCS score calculation.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated prevalence of FCS was 19.4 per million in our region, which exceeds the prevalence data of other European countries. Analysis of larger regional and country-wide data might increase the number of FCS cases. Although FCS score is an excellent tool in identifying potential FCS patients, consideration of some other features may improve its accuracy.

摘要

背景

中欧地区关于家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征(FCS)患病率的确切数据尚无。我们旨在使用Moulin等人提出的FCS评分或通过数据挖掘来识别FCS患者,并评估FCS评分的诊断适用性。

方法

分析1342124例患者的病历,计算每位患者的FCS评分。基于先前诊断为FCS患者的数据,我们训练机器学习模型以识别可能改善FCS评分计算的其他特征。

结果

我们识别出26例FCS评分≥10的患者。在训练好的模型中,提升树模型和支持向量机在患者识别方面表现最佳,总体曲线下面积(AUC)高于0.95,而人工神经网络的AUC高于0.8,表明效果较差。我们识别出了可纳入FCS评分计算的实验室特征。

结论

我们所在地区FCS的估计患病率为百万分之19.4,超过了其他欧洲国家的患病率数据。对更大区域和全国范围数据的分析可能会增加FCS病例数。尽管FCS评分是识别潜在FCS患者的优秀工具,但考虑一些其他特征可能会提高其准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/579f/9331828/f9353ed47cbd/jcm-11-04311-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验