• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪与肺癌筛查:优先考虑关怀的人文方法。

Emotions and lung cancer screening: Prioritising a humanistic approach to care.

机构信息

School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5259-e5269. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13945. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13945
PMID:35894098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10947369/
Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening has mortality benefits. Yet, uptake has been low. To inform strategies to better deliver and promote screening, in 2018, we interviewed 27 long-term smokers immediately following lung cancer screening in Australia, prior to receiving scan results. Existing lung screening studies employ the Health Belief Model. Reflecting growing acknowledgement of the centrality of emotions to screening uptake, we draw on psychological and sociological theories on emotions to thematically and abductively analyse the emotional dimensions of lung cancer screening, with implications for screening promotion and delivery. As smokers, interviewees described feeling stigmatised, with female participants internalising and male participants resisting stigma. Guilt and fear related to lung cancer were described as screening motivators. The screening itself elicited mild positive emotions. Notably, interviewees expressed gratitude for the care implicitly shown through lung screening to smokers. More than individual risk assessment, findings suggest lung screening campaigns should prioritise emotions. Peer workers have been found to increase cancer screening uptake in marginalised communities, however the risk to confidentiality-especially for female smokers-limits its feasibility in lung cancer screening. Instead, we suggest involving peer consultants in developing targeted screening strategies that foreground emotions. Furthermore, findings suggest prioritising humanistic care in lung screening delivery. Such an approach may be especially important for smokers from low socioeconomic backgrounds, who perceive lung cancer screening and smoking as sources of stigma and face a higher risk of dying from lung cancer and lower engagement with screening.

摘要

低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查可降低死亡率。然而,其接受程度仍然较低。为了制定更好的策略来提供和推广筛查,我们在 2018 年澳大利亚进行肺癌筛查后,在患者收到扫描结果之前,对 27 名长期吸烟的患者进行了采访。现有的肺癌筛查研究采用健康信念模型。反映出对情绪在筛查参与中的核心作用的认识不断增强,我们借鉴了关于情绪的心理学和社会学理论,对肺癌筛查的情绪维度进行了主题和推断性分析,为筛查推广和实施提供了启示。作为吸烟者,受访者表示感到被污名化,女性参与者内化了这种污名化,而男性参与者则抵制了这种污名化。与肺癌相关的内疚感和恐惧感被描述为筛查的动机。筛查本身引发了轻微的积极情绪。值得注意的是,受访者对通过肺癌筛查向吸烟者表示关怀表示感激。研究结果表明,与个体风险评估相比,肺癌筛查活动应优先考虑情绪因素。同伴工作人员已被发现可以增加边缘化社区的癌症筛查参与度,但是保密性风险(特别是对于女性吸烟者)限制了其在肺癌筛查中的可行性。相反,我们建议在制定有针对性的筛查策略时,让同伴顾问参与其中,并将情绪放在首位。此外,研究结果表明,在肺癌筛查实施过程中应优先考虑人性化关怀。对于来自社会经济背景较低的吸烟者来说,这种方法可能尤其重要,因为他们认为肺癌筛查和吸烟是污名化的来源,并且面临更高的死于肺癌的风险和更低的参与筛查的可能性。

相似文献

1
Emotions and lung cancer screening: Prioritising a humanistic approach to care.情绪与肺癌筛查:优先考虑关怀的人文方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5259-e5269. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13945. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication.社会经济贫困和重度吸烟社区人群对肺癌筛查的态度:为筛查沟通提供信息。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):563-573. doi: 10.1111/hex.12481. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
"To know or not to know…?" Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision-making intentions.“知或不知……?”推动和阻碍从不吸烟者肺癌筛查接受意愿的决策。
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):162-172. doi: 10.1111/hex.12838. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Determinants of motivation to quit in smokers screened for the early detection of lung cancer: a qualitative study.筛查肺癌早期的吸烟者戒烟动机的决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):1276. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6211-1.
5
Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts.吸烟者及其不吸烟的同龄人对肺癌筛查的态度。
Thorax. 2007 Feb;62(2):126-30. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.056036. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
6
Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.向吸烟者宣传肺癌筛查面临的挑战:一项关于初级保健中决策经历的定性研究
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1420-y.
7
Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者决策辅助工具对吸烟人群肺癌筛查决策的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920362. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20362.
8
Lung cancer screening: what do long-term smokers know and believe?肺癌筛查:长期吸烟者了解并相信什么?
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/hex.12433. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening.在肺癌筛查背景下关于戒烟的态度和看法。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1530-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3558.
10
Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening Among African American Smokers.制定针对非裔美国烟民的肺癌筛查决策价值观声明。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01687-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening uptake and intention to screen: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.肺癌筛查接受度和筛查意愿的患者障碍与促进因素:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e003127. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003127.
2
'Every Touch Point Is an Opportunity': Tobacco Control Experts' Views on How to Implement Smoking Cessation Interventions Within an Australian Lung Cancer Screening Program.“每个接触点都是一个机会”:控烟专家对如何在澳大利亚肺癌筛查项目中实施戒烟干预措施的看法。
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(10):e70963. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70963.
3
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography-where do we go from here?低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——我们从这里走向何方?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Dec 1;116(12):1878-1881. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae197.
4
"Because That is the Right Thing to do": A Focus Group Study of Australian Expert Perspectives on Offering Smoking Cessation Support in Lung Cancer Screening.“因为那是正确的做法”:一项关于澳大利亚专家对在肺癌筛查中提供戒烟支持的观点的焦点小组研究
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 24;27(3):387-397. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae215.
5
Participant factors associated with psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening: A systematic review.与肺癌筛查的心理社会影响相关的参与者因素:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70054. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70054.
6
Lung Cancer Screening: Implementation Challenges and Health Equity Considerations For the Western Pacific Region.肺癌筛查:西太平洋区域的实施挑战与健康公平性考量
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan;9:e2200329. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00329.

本文引用的文献

1
Imperatives of health or happiness: Narrative constructions of long-term smoking after undergoing lung screening.健康或幸福的必要条件:肺部筛查后长期吸烟的叙事结构
Health (London). 2023 Nov;27(6):1115-1134. doi: 10.1177/13634593221099108. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
3
'Wise up to cancer': Adapting a community based health intervention to increase UK South Asian women's uptake of cancer screening.“了解癌症”:调整基于社区的健康干预措施,以提高英国南亚裔女性对癌症筛查的接受度。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):1979-1987. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13579. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Afflexivity in post-qualitative inquiry: prioritising affect and reflexivity in the evaluation of a health information website.后定性研究中的情感投入:在健康信息网站评估中优先考虑情感投入和反思性。
Health Sociol Rev. 2021 Nov;30(3):323-338. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2021.1976068. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Managing shame and guilt in addiction: A pathway to recovery.管理成瘾中的羞耻感和内疚感:通往康复的途径。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106954. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106954. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
6
Broadened Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening: Challenges and Uncertainty for Implementation and Equity.扩大肺癌筛查的适用范围:实施与公平性方面的挑战和不确定性
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):939-941. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26422.
7
Targeting cancer prevention and screening interventions to LGBTQ communities: A scoping review.针对 LGBTQ 群体的癌症预防和筛查干预措施:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):1233-1248. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13257. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach?对腰痛治疗的生物心理社会模型的批判性回顾:是否需要新方法?
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(13):3270-3284. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1851783. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
Lung cancer screening implementation: Complexities and priorities.肺癌筛查实施:复杂性与优先事项。
Respirology. 2020 Nov;25 Suppl 2:5-23. doi: 10.1111/resp.13963.
10
The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review.真实互动对护患关系的影响:范围综述。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Apr;28(2):e12388. doi: 10.1111/nin.12388. Epub 2020 Nov 9.