• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国健康的社会决定因素与腹部实体器官移植等待名单之间的关联。

Associations between social determinants of health and abdominal solid organ transplant wait-lists in the United States.

作者信息

Johnson Wali R, Rega Scott A, Feurer Irene D, Karp Seth J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Nov;36(11):e14784. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14784. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14784
PMID:35894259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Societal factors that influence wait-listing for transplantation are complex and poorly understood. Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect rates of and outcomes after transplantation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study investigated the impact of SDOH on additions to state-level, 2017-2018 kidney and liver wait-lists. Principal components analysis, starting with 127 variables among 3142 counties, was used to derive novel, comprehensive state-level composites, designated (1) health/economics and (2) community capital/urbanicity. Stepwise multivariate linear regression with backwards elimination (n = 51; 50 states and DC) tested the effects of these composites, Medicaid expansion, and center density on adult disease burden-adjusted wait-list additions.

RESULTS

SDOH related to increased community capital/urbanicity were independently associated with wait-listing (starting models: B = .40, P = .010 Kidney; B = .36, P = .038 Liver) (final models: B = .31, P = .027 Kidney, B = .34, P = .015 Liver). In contrast and surprisingly, no other covariates were associated with wait-listing (P ≥ .122).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that deficits in community resources are important contributors to disparities in wait-list access. Our composite SDOH metrics may help identify at-risk communities, which can be the focus of local and national policy initiatives to improve access to organ transplantation.

摘要

背景

影响移植等待名单的社会因素复杂且鲜为人知。健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)会影响移植的发生率和术后结果。

方法

这项横断面研究调查了SDOH对2017 - 2018年州级肾脏和肝脏等待名单增加情况的影响。从3142个县的127个变量开始,采用主成分分析来得出新的、全面的州级综合指标,分别命名为(1)健康/经济和(2)社区资本/城市化程度。采用逐步多元线性回归及向后剔除法(n = 51;50个州和哥伦比亚特区)来测试这些综合指标、医疗补助扩大以及中心密度对成人疾病负担调整后的等待名单增加情况的影响。

结果

与社区资本/城市化程度增加相关的SDOH与进入等待名单独立相关(初始模型:肾脏:B = 0.40,P = 0.010;肝脏:B = 0.36,P = 0.038)(最终模型:肾脏:B = 0.31,P = 0.027;肝脏:B = 0.34,P = 0.015)。相比之下且令人惊讶的是,没有其他协变量与进入等待名单相关(P≥0.122)。

结论

这些结果表明社区资源的不足是等待名单获取差异的重要因素。我们的综合SDOH指标可能有助于识别高危社区,这些社区可以成为地方和国家政策举措的重点,以改善器官移植的可及性。

相似文献

1
Associations between social determinants of health and abdominal solid organ transplant wait-lists in the United States.美国健康的社会决定因素与腹部实体器官移植等待名单之间的关联。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Nov;36(11):e14784. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14784. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.农村和城市地区居民的实体器官等待名单登记率、移植率和生存率。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):202-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50.
3
Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Have Highest Rates of Wait-listing for Liver Transplantation Among Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease.在终末期肝病患者中,肝细胞癌患者等待肝移植的比例最高。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;14(11):1638-1646.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.美国器官移植获取机会不公平的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 12;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01616-x.
5
Factors Associated With Access to and Receipt of Liver Transplantation in Veterans With End-stage Liver Disease.与终末期肝病退伍军人获得肝移植和接受肝移植相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):949-959. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2051.
6
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
7
The UNOS OPTN waiting list: 1988-1995.器官共享联合网络(UNOS)等待名单:1988 - 1995年
Clin Transpl. 1995:69-84.
8
Kidney transplantation and wait-listing rates from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).国际透析结果与实践模式研究(DOPPS)中的肾移植及等待名单登记率。
Kidney Int. 2005 Jul;68(1):330-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00412.x.
9
Psychosocial variables are associated with being wait-listed, but not with receiving a kidney transplant in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).在透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)中,社会心理变量与等待名单有关,但与接受肾移植无关。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May;27(5):2107-13. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr568. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
10
Social determinants of health data in solid organ transplantation: National data sources and future directions.社会决定因素在实体器官移植中的健康数据:国家数据来源和未来方向。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2293-2301. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17096. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and pediatric kidney transplant outcomes.健康的社会决定因素与小儿肾移植结果
Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s00467-025-06897-w.
2
The Affordable Care Act Improves Access, Survival, and Racial Disparities of Patients With Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.《平价医疗法案改善了肝病患者的就医机会、生存率及种族差异:一项系统评价》
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.04.032.
3
Social Disadvantage and Disparities in Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.社会劣势与慢性肝病的差异:一项系统综述
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 30. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003171.
4
Impact of Medicaid expansion on kidney transplantation in the State Oklahoma.医疗补助扩大对俄克拉荷马州肾脏移植的影响。
World J Transplant. 2024 Sep 18;14(3):92981. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.92981.
5
Equity in liver transplantation: are we any closer?肝移植中的公平性:我们更接近目标了吗?
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023 Aug 1;28(4):259-264. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001085. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
A comparison of deprivation indices and application to transplant populations.剥夺指数的比较及其在移植人群中的应用。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Mar;23(3):377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.018. Epub 2023 Jan 12.