Fadgyas Balázs, Garai Gábor István, Ringwald Zoltán, Őri Dorottya, Vajda Péter
1 Heim Pál Országos Gyermekgyógyászati Intézet, Sebészeti és Traumatológiai Osztály Budapest, Üllői út 86., 1089 Magyarország.
2 Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Gyermekgyógyászati Klinika, Manuális Tanszék Pécs Magyarország.
Orv Hetil. 2022 Jun 19;163(25):1001-1004. doi: 10.1556/650.2022.32485.
Introduction: The advantages of laparoscopic against open appendectomy were observed both in adults and children. Objective: The aim of the authors was to study the learning period when they switched from open to laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: Retrospective, observational study was performed. Children (0–18 years) between 2016 and 2017 were included, who underwent acute appendectomy. Exclusion criteria were other surgical procedure performed at the same time (Meckel’s diverticulum, ovarian pathology), converted laparoscopic procedure and malignancies. Patients were divided to open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) groups. Duration of the procedures, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications were reviewed. For statistical analysis Mann–Whitney, Fisher’s exact and chi2 tests were used. Results: During the study period, 297 appendectomies were performed (open: 149, laparoscopic: 148). In 2017, reaching the end of the learning curve, laparoscopy was the faster procedure (p = 0.0003). The length of stay was shorter in laparoscopic than in open appendectomy (p<0.0001). There was no difference in the number of postoperative complications between the OA and the LA groups (p = 0.2409). Discussion: Our study supports the international studies in English literature which showed that the results of a laparoscopic operation in childhood after the “learning phase” do not differ, and may be better, than those of an open one. Conclusion: LA is a safe and fast procedure in childhood. Even paediatric surgeons who did previously only open procedures, can switch to the laparoscopic technique following a short learning curve.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术相对于开放阑尾切除术的优势在成人和儿童中均有观察到。目的:作者旨在研究从开放阑尾切除术转换为腹腔镜阑尾切除术的学习阶段。方法:进行回顾性观察研究。纳入2016年至2017年间接受急性阑尾切除术的儿童(0 - 18岁)。排除标准为同时进行的其他外科手术(梅克尔憩室、卵巢病变)、中转的腹腔镜手术和恶性肿瘤。患者分为开放阑尾切除术(OA)组和腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)组。回顾手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症。采用曼 - 惠特尼检验、费舍尔精确检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:在研究期间,共进行了297例阑尾切除术(开放手术:149例,腹腔镜手术:148例)。2017年,在学习曲线结束时,腹腔镜手术更快(p = 0.0003)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术的住院时间比开放阑尾切除术短(p<0.0001)。OA组和LA组术后并发症数量无差异(p = 0.2409)。讨论:我们的研究支持英文文献中的国际研究,这些研究表明,在“学习阶段”之后,儿童腹腔镜手术的结果与开放手术的结果无异,甚至可能更好。结论:LA在儿童中是一种安全且快速的手术。即使是以前仅进行开放手术的小儿外科医生,在经过短暂的学习曲线后也可以转换为腹腔镜技术。