Fosbøl Emil L, Fosbøl Philip L, Rerup Sofie, Østergaard Lauge, Ahmed Mohammed H, Butt Jawad, Davidsen Julie, Shanmuganathan Nirusiya, Juul Simon, Lewinter Christian
Department of Cardiology B, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Blejdamsvej 9, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.
The Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 24;16:189. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0713-2.
We studied the scientific yield of the medical PhD program at all Danish Universities.
We undertook a retrospective observational study. Three PhD schools in Denmark were included in order to evaluate the postdoctoral research production over more than 18 years through individual publications accessed by PubMed.
A total of 2686 PhD-graduates (1995-2013) with a medical background were included according to registries from all PhD schools in Denmark. They had a median age of 35 years (interquartile range (IQR), 32-38) and 53 % were women at the time of graduation. Scientific activity over time was assessed independently of author-rank and inactivity was measured relative to the date of graduation. Factors associated with inactivity were identified using multivariable logistic regression. 88.6 % of the PhD theses were conducted in internal medicine vs. 11.4 % in surgery. During follow-up (median 6.9 years, IQR 3.0-11.7), PubMed data searches identified that 87 (3.4 %) of the PhD graduates had no publication after they graduated from the PhD program, 40 % had 5 or less, and 90 % had 30 or less. The median number of publications per year after PhD graduation was 1.12 (IQR 0.61-1.99) papers per year. About 2/3 of the graduates became inactive after 1 year and approximately 21 % of the graduates remained active during the whole follow-up. Female gender was associated with inactivity: adjusted odds ratio 1.59 (95 % confidence interval 1.24-2.05).
The scientific production of Danish medic PhD-graduates was mainly produced around the time of PhD-graduation. After obtaining the PhD-degree the scientific production declines suggesting that scientific advance fails and resources are not harnessed.
我们研究了丹麦所有大学医学博士项目的科研产出情况。
我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究。纳入了丹麦的三所博士学院,以便通过PubMed获取的个人出版物来评估超过18年的博士后研究成果。
根据丹麦所有博士学院的登记记录,共纳入了2686名具有医学背景的博士毕业生(1995 - 2013年)。他们毕业时的中位年龄为35岁(四分位间距(IQR),32 - 38岁),53%为女性。随着时间推移的科研活动是独立于作者排名进行评估的,不活跃情况是相对于毕业日期来衡量的。使用多变量逻辑回归确定与不活跃相关的因素。88.6%的博士论文是在内科进行的,而外科为11.4%。在随访期间(中位时间6.9年,IQR 3.0 - 11.7年),通过PubMed数据检索发现,87名(3.4%)博士毕业生毕业后没有发表任何论文,40%的人发表了5篇或更少的论文,90%的人发表了30篇或更少的论文。博士毕业后每年的出版物中位数为每年1.12篇(IQR 0.61 - 1.99篇)。约2/3的毕业生在1年后变得不活跃,约21%的毕业生在整个随访期间一直保持活跃。女性与不活跃相关:调整后的优势比为1.59(95%置信区间1.24 - 2.05)。
丹麦医学博士毕业生的科研成果主要在博士毕业前后产出。获得博士学位后,科研产出下降,这表明科研进展失败且资源未得到有效利用。