Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Mondium GGz, Clinical Health Center, Beesd, The Netherlands.
Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
The aim of this work was to determine dentists' ability to accurately estimate patients' anxiety level during dental treatment (ie, "empathic accuracy") and to determine the strength of the association between empathic accuracy and patient-reported reassurance.
A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst 177 adult patients who underwent different invasive dental procedures (ie, extractions or procedures requiring injections and drilling) performed by 10 different dentists from 3 dental offices in the Netherlands. Patients reported their anxiety level during treatment and the extent to which they felt reassured by the dentist using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Simultaneously, the dentists estimated patients' anxiety level. Empathic accuracy was calculated as an absolute difference between patient-reported anxiety (100-point VAS) and dentist estimation of anxiety (100-point VAS).
Agreement between dentists' assessment of patients' anxiety and patient-reported anxiety proved good, intraclass correlation coefficient (177) = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.71. A small to medium-sized positive correlation, r (177) = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.00-0.29, was found between dentists' empathic accuracy and patient-reported reassurance. A negative correlation was found between empathic accuracy and patients' anxiety scores, r (177) = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.09.
Given that greater empathic accuracy was associated with higher patient-reported reassurance during treatment, training young dental professionals in empathic accuracy might help patients feel reassured. Importantly, our results also suggest that with elevated levels of patient anxiety it is increasingly challenging for dentists to recognise this emotion, and thus support the patient in anoptimal manner.
本研究旨在评估牙医在口腔治疗过程中准确评估患者焦虑程度的能力(即“同理心准确性”),并确定同理心准确性与患者报告的安抚之间的关联强度。
横断面研究纳入了 177 名接受不同侵袭性口腔治疗(即拔牙或需要注射和钻孔的治疗)的成年患者,这些患者由来自荷兰 3 家牙科诊所的 10 名不同牙医进行治疗。患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)报告治疗期间的焦虑程度和他们感到被牙医安抚的程度。同时,牙医评估患者的焦虑程度。同理心准确性的计算方法是患者报告的焦虑程度(100 点 VAS)与牙医估计的焦虑程度(100 点 VAS)之间的绝对差异。
牙医对患者焦虑程度的评估与患者报告的焦虑程度之间的一致性较好,组内相关系数(177)=0.63;95%置信区间[CI],0.53-0.71。发现牙医的同理心准确性与患者报告的安抚之间存在小到中等强度的正相关,r(177)=0.15;95%CI,0.00-0.29。发现同理心准确性与患者的焦虑评分呈负相关,r(177)=-0.23;95%CI,-0.38 至-0.09。
鉴于更大的同理心准确性与治疗期间患者报告的更高安抚程度相关,因此,对年轻的牙科专业人员进行同理心准确性的培训可能有助于患者感到安心。重要的是,我们的结果还表明,随着患者焦虑程度的升高,牙医越来越难以识别这种情绪,因此无法以最佳方式支持患者。