• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨推特上关于 HPV 疫苗的错误信息内容。

Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine; and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics; and Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1
PMID:35896853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328646/
Abstract

Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted on Twitter between December 15, 2019, through March 31, 2020, among 3876 unique, English language #HPV Tweets, excluding retweets. We found that 24% of Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation, and the remaining 76% contained support/education. The most prevalent categories of disinformation/misinformation were (1) adverse health effects (59%), (2) mandatory vaccination (19%), and (3) inefficacy of the vaccine (14%). Among the adverse health effects Tweets, non-specific harm/injury (51%) and death (23%) were most frequent. Disinformation/misinformation Tweets vs. supportive Tweets had 5.44 (95% CI 5.33-5.56) times the incidence rate of retweet. In conclusion, almost one-quarter of #HPV Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation about the HPV vaccine and these tweets received higher audience engagement including likes and retweets. Implications for vaccine hesitancy are discussed.

摘要

虽然社交媒体可以成为家长了解 HPV 疫苗接种的信息来源,但这些信息并不总是完整或准确的。我们进行了一项回顾性内容分析,以确定 2019 年 12 月 15 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间,在 3876 条独特的、英语语言的#HPV 推文中,除了转发的推文外,关于 HPV 疫苗的虚假和错误信息的内容和出现频率。我们发现,24%的推文包含虚假或错误信息,其余 76%的推文包含支持/教育内容。虚假/错误信息最常见的类别是:(1)不良健康影响(59%),(2)强制接种(19%),(3)疫苗无效(14%)。在关于不良健康影响的推文中,非特异性伤害/损伤(51%)和死亡(23%)最为常见。虚假/错误信息推文与支持性推文的转发率之比为 5.44(95%CI 5.33-5.56)。总之,近四分之一的#HPV 推文包含关于 HPV 疫苗的虚假或错误信息,这些推文获得了更高的受众参与度,包括点赞和转发。讨论了对疫苗犹豫的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/9328646/32fb093036f5/10865_2022_342_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/9328646/32fb093036f5/10865_2022_342_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/9328646/32fb093036f5/10865_2022_342_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter.探讨推特上关于 HPV 疫苗的错误信息内容。
J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Vaccine misinformation types and properties in Russian troll tweets.俄罗斯网络水军发布的疫苗虚假信息的类型和特征。
Vaccine. 2022 Feb 7;40(6):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.040. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
4
Misinformation and other elements in HPV vaccine tweets: an experimental comparison.HPV 疫苗推文中的错误信息和其他元素:一项实验比较。
J Behav Med. 2021 Jun;44(3):310-319. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00203-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
The Role of Scientific Research in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Discussions on Twitter: Social Network Analysis.《在 Twitter 上关于人乳头瘤病毒疫苗讨论中的科学研究作用:社会网络分析》。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 May 9;4:e50551. doi: 10.2196/50551.
6
Identifying False Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Information and Corresponding Risk Perceptions From Twitter: Advanced Predictive Models.从 Twitter 上识别虚假人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗信息和相应的风险认知:先进的预测模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 9;23(9):e30451. doi: 10.2196/30451.
7
Public perception of the resumption of HPV vaccine recommendation in Japan: Twitter content analysis.公众对日本恢复 HPV 疫苗推荐的看法:推特内容分析。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Dec 1;38(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad153.
8
Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study.利用标签#scamdemic 和 #plandemic 分析推特上的 COVID-19 虚假信息:回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0268409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268409. eCollection 2022.
9
Countering Antivax Misinformation via Social Media: Message-Testing Randomized Experiment for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake.通过社交媒体对抗反疫苗错误信息:人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率的信息测试随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 24;24(11):e37559. doi: 10.2196/37559.
10
Comparing human papillomavirus vaccine concerns on Twitter: a cross-sectional study of users in Australia, Canada and the UK.比较推特上对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的担忧:一项针对澳大利亚、加拿大和英国用户的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e016869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016869.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Internet Information on Anti-HPV Vaccines: A Comprehensive Overview of a Double-Edged Sword.互联网信息在抗人乳头瘤病毒疫苗方面的作用:对双刃剑的全面概述
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;13(5):445. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050445.
2
Types of HPV Vaccine Misinformation Circulating on Twitter (X) That Parents Find Most Concerning: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Survey and Content Analysis.推特(X)上流传的父母最担心的HPV疫苗错误信息类型:来自横断面调查和内容分析的见解。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 12;27:e54657. doi: 10.2196/54657.
3
Human Papillomavirus: A Narrative Review for Dental Providers in Prevention and Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing COVID-19 Content Posted to TikTok: Public Sentiment and Response During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.描述 TikTok 上发布的 COVID-19 内容:COVID-19 大流行第一阶段的公众情绪和反应。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug;69(2):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy between maternal engagement with anti- and pro-vaccine social media posts and adolescent HPV-vaccine uptake rates in the US: The perspective of loss aversion in emotion-laden decision circumstances.疫苗犹豫在母亲接触反疫苗和支持疫苗的社交媒体帖子与美国青少年 HPV 疫苗接种率之间的中介作用:在情绪决策环境中损失规避的观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114043. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114043. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
人乳头瘤病毒:面向牙科从业者的预防与护理综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;22(3):439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030439.
4
Sex differences in parental reasons for lack of intent to initiate HPV vaccination among adolescents ages 13-17 years: National Immunization Survey - Teen 2019-2021.13至17岁青少年家长未打算启动HPV疫苗接种原因的性别差异:2019 - 2021年全国青少年免疫调查
Vaccine. 2025 Jan 12;44:126584. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126584. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
5
Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review.关于女性生殖健康的网络误导性信息:一项叙述性综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
6
A critical evaluation of the status of HPV vaccination in São Paulo State, Brazil.巴西圣保罗州 HPV 疫苗接种状况的批判性评估。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Nov 6;79:100526. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100526. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring vaccine hesitancy in digital public discourse: From tribal polarization to socio-economic disparities.探索数字公共话语中的疫苗犹豫:从部落极化到社会经济差距。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 5;19(11):e0308122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308122. eCollection 2024.
8
HPV vaccine misinformation on social media: A multi-method qualitative analysis of comments across three platforms.社交媒体上关于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的错误信息:对三个平台评论的多方法定性分析
PEC Innov. 2024 Aug 8;5:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100329. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
9
Influences of HPV disease perceptions, vaccine accessibility, and information exposure on social media on HPV vaccination uptake among 11,678 mothers with daughters aged 9-17 years in China: a cross-sectional study.在中国,针对 11678 名 9-17 岁女儿的母亲进行的一项横断面研究显示,HPV 疾病认知、疫苗可及性、社交媒体信息暴露对 HPV 疫苗接种率的影响。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03538-1.
10
Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on HPV Recommendations: Themes of Interest to Different Population Groups and Strategies for Approaching Them.医疗保健专业人员对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关建议的看法:不同人群感兴趣的主题及应对策略
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 6;12(7):748. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070748.
Correcting HPV Vaccination Misinformation Online: Evaluating the Social Media Campaign.纠正网络上关于人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的错误信息:评估社交媒体宣传活动
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 6;9(4):352. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040352.
4
A validated modification of the vaccine hesitancy scale for childhood, influenza and HPV vaccines.用于儿童、流感和 HPV 疫苗的疫苗犹豫量表的验证性修正。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 26;39(13):1831-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses.谁容易受到网络健康谣言的影响?对四个心理社会假设的检验。
Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;40(4):274-284. doi: 10.1037/hea0000978. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
7
Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines.社交媒体疫苗错误信息事实核查对疫苗态度的影响。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106408. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106408. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
8
From bad to worse II: Risk amplification of the HPV vaccine on Facebook.从坏到更坏 II:Facebook 上 HPV 疫苗的风险放大。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
Dimensions of Misinformation About the HPV Vaccine on Instagram: Content and Network Analysis of Social Media Characteristics.Instagram 上 HPV 疫苗错误信息的维度:社交媒体特征的内容和网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21451. doi: 10.2196/21451.
10
Parental Online Information Access and Childhood Vaccination Decisions in North America: Scoping Review.父母在线获取信息与北美儿童疫苗接种决策:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 13;22(10):e20002. doi: 10.2196/20002.