Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Department of Basic Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 24;19(15):8995. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158995.
A gap in knowledge about current splinting practice exists between the educational program and clinical service. To bridge this gap, we investigated the perspectives and experiences of Thai occupational therapists regarding contemporary hand splinting practices in clinical use. A mixed-method study was designed. An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. In the first quantitative phase, a survey questionnaire was mailed to occupational therapists. The questions were regarding contemporary hand splinting practices in clinical use at seven hospitals in the capital city of Bangkok and outskirt areas. In the second phase, semi-structured interviews were completed to explore expert occupational therapists' perspectives on practice in the same hospital settings. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed that most conditions receiving splints were nerve injuries, orthopedics, and stroke, which represented the service frequency of splint types: functional resting (100%), cock-up (93.3%), and thumb spica splints (80%). Bone and joint deformity prevention ranked first with muscle contracture prevention being ranked second, and the third-ranked was maintaining range of motion. Three themes emerged from the interviews: starting with the patient condition; effective function and value; knowledge and experiential skills. Perspectives and experiences of occupational therapists in splinting practice contribute to education based on the reality of practice. Integrated numerical and textual data of professional skills and knowledge in actual splinting practice can be reflected through splints and orthoses program revisions to meet future learning outcomes.
知识差距存在于教育项目和临床服务之间,涉及当前的夹板实践。为了弥合这一差距,我们调查了泰国职业治疗师对当代手部夹板临床应用的观点和经验。采用混合方法研究设计。使用解释性顺序混合方法设计。在第一定量阶段,向职业治疗师邮寄了一份问卷调查表。问题涉及首都曼谷和郊区七家医院的临床使用中的当代手部夹板实践。在第二阶段,在相同的医院环境中完成了半结构化访谈,以探讨专家职业治疗师对实践的观点。使用主题分析对转录本进行了分析。结果表明,接受夹板的大多数情况是神经损伤、骨科和中风,这代表了夹板类型的服务频率:功能性休息(100%)、翘曲(93.3%)和拇指斯皮卡夹板(80%)。预防骨和关节畸形位居第一,预防肌肉挛缩位居第二,保持活动范围位居第三。访谈中出现了三个主题:从患者病情开始;有效功能和价值;知识和经验技能。夹板实践中职业治疗师的观点和经验有助于基于实践现实的教育。可以通过修改夹板和矫形器计划来反映实际夹板实践中的专业技能和知识的综合数字和文字数据,以满足未来的学习成果。