Su Yi-Chia, Chien Cheng-Yu, Chaou Chung-Hsien, Hsu Kuang-Hung, Gao Shi-Ying, Ng Chip-Jin
Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jul 20;15:6227-6235. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S373396. eCollection 2022.
Because of physiologic changes in older adults, their vital signs need to be assessed differently. This study aimed to determine appropriate vital sign cut points for triage designation in older patients presented to the emergency department (ED).
Data from 78,524 ED visits of patients aged ≥65 years in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (LCGMH) between 2016 and 2017 were collected. New cut points for vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], heart rate [HR], body temperature [BT], and Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) were determined using the critical event rate (the composite of admission to ICU and mortality in hospital) for each vital sign. The newly proposed triage scale was then validated using two other databases (Chang Gung Research Database [CGRD] and Taipei City Hospital [TPECH] database). The Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale (TTAS) was used in this study.
In the LCGMH derivation group, older patients presenting with SBP < 80 mmHg, HR < 40 or > 140 beats per minute (bpm), BT < 35°C, and GCS score 3-8 had a critical event rate of >20% and were proposed to be uptriaged to TTAS level 1. Following a reclassification, a portion of older patients are uptriaged by the newly proposed TTAS, and increase in the critical event rate in TTAS level 1 and level 2 groups compared to the existing TTAS. The newly proposed TTAS exhibited comparable discriminatory ability for triage in older patients compared to the existing TTAS (the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: CGRD, 0.76 vs 0.62; TPECH, 0.71 vs 0.59).
Revising the vital signs triage criteria for older patients could be a way to improve the identification of patients with critical event outcomes in high TTAS level, thereby improving triage accuracy among older patients visiting the ED.
由于老年人的生理变化,他们的生命体征需要采用不同的评估方式。本研究旨在确定急诊科老年患者分诊指定的合适生命体征切点。
收集了2016年至2017年林口长庚纪念医院(LCGMH)78524例年龄≥65岁患者的急诊就诊数据。使用每个生命体征的危急事件发生率(入住重症监护病房和院内死亡率的综合指标)确定生命体征(收缩压[SBP]、心率[HR]、体温[BT]和格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS])的新切点。然后使用另外两个数据库(长庚研究数据库[CGRD]和台北市立医院[TPECH]数据库)对新提出的分诊量表进行验证。本研究采用台湾分诊与 acuity 量表(TTAS)。
在LCGMH推导组中,收缩压<80 mmHg、心率<40或>140次/分钟(bpm)、体温<35°C且GCS评分为3 - 8分的老年患者危急事件发生率>20%,建议将其分诊至TTAS 1级。重新分类后,一部分老年患者被新提出的TTAS上调分诊级别,与现有TTAS相比,TTAS 1级和2级组的危急事件发生率有所增加。与现有TTAS相比,新提出的TTAS在老年患者分诊中表现出相当的区分能力(受试者操作特征曲线下面积:CGRD,0.76对0.62;TPECH,0.71对0.59)。
修订老年患者的生命体征分诊标准可能是一种改善在高TTAS级别中识别有危急事件结局患者的方法,从而提高老年急诊患者的分诊准确性。