Suppr超能文献

使用面罩或i-gel声门上气道及双指按压进行单人新生儿心肺复苏——一项采用交叉设计的人体模型研究

One-rescuer newborn CPR using a face mask or an i-gel supraglottic airway and two-finger compressions - A manikin study with cross-over desgin.

作者信息

Isobe Aoi, Asui Risa, Katayama Toshiro, Mizumoto Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Kitano Hospital, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Japan.

Department of Medical Engineering, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Japan.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2022 Jul 22;11:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100276. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When unanticipated neonatal asphyxia occurs, it may be necessary for a single resuscitator to commence advanced resuscitation before others arrive. We hypothesised that a single rescuer can provide positive pressure ventilations and chest compressions using higher inflation pressures and better adherence to the recommended compression rate with an i-gel supraglottic airway than with a face mask.

METHOD

A manikin-based cross-over study was conducted. Twenty-one midwives performed both positive pressure ventilation using a T-piece and chest compressions with the two-finger technique on a newborn manikin alone. They performed ventilation with a face mask or an i-gel. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was set to 30 cmHO. The actual PIPs were evaluated based on the values displayed on the manometer. The total amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles of three compressions and one ventilation was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean of the average PIP for each participant was significantly lower with a face mask than with an i-gel (17.3 ± 4.4 vs 28.2 ± 2.0 cmHO,  < 0.00001). The amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles was significantly longer with a face mask than with an i-gel (66.2 ± 6.1 vs 60.6 ± 3.4 seconds,  < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

During one-rescuer newborn resuscitation using a T-piece and the two-finger technique, the PIPs are consistently high and 30 cycles of CPR are better adhered to 60 seconds using an i-gel.

摘要

引言

当意外发生新生儿窒息时,可能需要单个复苏者在其他人到达之前就开始进行高级复苏。我们假设,与使用面罩相比,单个救援者使用i-gel声门上气道进行正压通气和胸外按压时,能够采用更高的充气压力,并更好地遵循推荐的按压速率。

方法

进行了一项基于人体模型的交叉研究。21名助产士仅在新生儿人体模型上分别使用T形管进行正压通气和采用两指技术进行胸外按压。她们使用面罩或i-gel进行通气。将吸气峰压(PIP)设定为30 cmH₂O。根据压力计上显示的值评估实际PIP。还评估了完成30个按压和一次通气循环所需的总时间。

结果

每位参与者使用面罩时的平均PIP显著低于使用i-gel时(17.3 ± 4.4 vs 28.2 ± 2.0 cmH₂O,P < 0.00001)。使用面罩完成30个循环所需的时间显著长于使用i-gel时(66.2 ± 6.1 vs 60.6 ± 3.4秒,P < 0.0001)。

结论

在使用T形管和两指技术进行单人新生儿复苏期间,使用i-gel时PIP持续较高,且能更好地在60秒内完成3组30次的心肺复苏循环。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8793/9309653/979188a0244b/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验