Stine-Morrow Elizabeth A L, McCall Giavanna S, Manavbasi Ilber, Ng Shukhan, Llano Daniel A, Barbey Aron K
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:923795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923795. eCollection 2022.
Considerable evidence suggests that language processing depends on memory processes, which are vulnerable to declines with aging. Yet little is known about the effects of language processing in the form of sustained literacy engagement on memory and other aspects of cognition. In the current study, adults (60-79 years of age) were randomly assigned to an 8-week program of leisure reading ( = 38) or to an active puzzle control ( = 38). Relative to the control, the experimental group showed differential improvement in verbal working memory and episodic memory. The experimental group also showed evidence of enhanced conceptual integration in sentence processing. These effects did not vary as a function of personality characteristics (e.g., openness) hypothesized to be compatible with literacy engagement. These findings support the idea that the exercise of cognitive capacities in the context of everyday life may offset age-related impairment in areas of cognition engaged by the activity, regardless of dispositional fit.
大量证据表明,语言处理依赖于记忆过程,而记忆过程容易随着年龄增长而衰退。然而,对于持续识字活动形式的语言处理对记忆及认知其他方面的影响却知之甚少。在当前研究中,成年人(60 - 79岁)被随机分配到一个为期8周的休闲阅读项目(n = 38)或一个积极的拼图对照项目(n = 38)。相对于对照组,实验组在言语工作记忆和情景记忆方面有不同程度的改善。实验组在句子处理中也表现出概念整合增强的证据。这些影响并不因假设与识字活动相匹配的人格特征(如开放性)而有所不同。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即日常生活中认知能力的运用可能抵消与年龄相关的、该活动所涉及认知领域的损伤,而与性格匹配无关。