Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:883551. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551. eCollection 2022.
In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as "good" or "poor." One of the laboratories was marked as "relatively poor" (A), two as "medium" (B and F), and four as "relatively good" (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.
本研究采用逼近理想解排序法（TOPSIS）与秩和比法（RSR）相结合的综合评价方法，对病原微生物学实验室管理进行全面评价，为实验室管理的改进提供依据。采用世界卫生组织实验室评估工具，结合 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法，建立了中国病原微生物学实验室管理的评价指标体系，对 7 个省级疾病预防控制中心的病原微生物学实验室进行综合评价。评价体系包括 12 项一级指标和 37 项二级指标。在实验室管理方面，7 家实验室按等级由高到低依次为 D、G、E、C、F、B、A。实验室均未被评为“好”或“差”，其中 1 家被评为“相对较差”（A），2 家为“中等”（B 和 F），4 家为“相对较好”（C、E、G 和 D）。本研究提出了一种采用 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法评价实验室管理的方法，为全面评价病原微生物学实验室管理提供了依据，反映了实验室管理的实践情况。
