• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法的三级甲等中医医院医疗质量特征。

Characteristics of Medical Quality in Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals by TOPSIS and RSR Methods.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, China.

Medical Department,Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241275324. doi: 10.1177/00469580241275324.

DOI:10.1177/00469580241275324
PMID:39264055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406598/
Abstract

Performance evaluation is important for improving medical quality and services. But, there is a lack of research for medical quality in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals. This study examines the medical quality and various indicators of tertiary public traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Gansu Province, to establish a foundation for improving the medical and management standards of these hospitals. This study collected performance assessment data from 10 tertiary TCM hospitals in Gansu Province from 2019 to 2022. Thirteen indicators with TCM characteristics were selected and categorized into 3 aspects: control of medical costs, internal operational dimensions, and comprehensive management. The level of medical quality in different hospitals and in different years were determined using the TOPSIS method for ranking and the RSR method for grading. Firstly, in terms of TCM characteristic indicators, hospital H had the highest control of medical costs and comprehensive management among different hospitals, with 45.87% and 24.20% respectively. The highest values for control of medical costs and comprehensive management were observed in 2020, with 40.65% and 18.69% respectively among different years. When evaluating the medical quality of different hospitals using the TOPSIS method, it was found that hospital H had the highest ranking from 2020 to 2022, with values of 0.725, 0.778, and 0.667 respectively. Additionally, the RSR method indicated that hospital H had a high level of grading from 2020 to 2022, with values of 0.687, 0.690, and 0.723 respectively. These findings suggest that the medical quality of hospital H is at a high and stable level of development. Based on the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance appraisal results and ranking of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. The results showed that the highest ranking was hospital B(C = 0.913) in 2019. The highest ranking was hospital C(C = 0.809)in 2020. The highest ranking was hospital D(C = 0.689) in 2021. The highest ranking was hospital J(C = 0.865) in 2022. The RSR method indicated that high grading level were hospitals B(P = 0.899),F(P = 0.795) in 2019. The highest grading level was hospital C(P = 0.809) in 2020. The highest grading level were hospitals A(P = 0.868), D(P = 0.813), E(P = 0.689), G(P = 0.873), J(P = 0.813), K(P = 0.842) in 2022. Based on the above results indicate that there is a large variation in the medical quality profile of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. By comparing the results of TOPSIS and RSR method from 2019 to 2022, we found that the hospitals with identical ranking were D and J, and the hospitals with ≤2 difference in ranking was A,B,C,E in 2019, the hospitals with >2 ranking was A, F in 2020, the hospitals with >2 ranking were C, G in 2021, and the hospitals with identical ranking results were B,D,E,G,J in 2022. Comparing the ranking results of TOPSIS and RSR methods, showed that the hospitals with identical rankings were B, F from 2019 to 2022. The difference in ranking results ≤2 were A, C, D, E, G, H, J, K, indicating that high consistency between TOPSIS and RSR methods and credible results. The findings reveal significant fluctuations in medical quality across different years, while the overall level of medical quality remains relatively stable among the various hospitals. It is recommended that TCM hospitals focus on improving management efficiency, optimizing hospital operations, enhancing the utilization of medical resources, and fostering the efficient development of hospitals.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f5/11406598/4d5f13c3408f/10.1177_00469580241275324-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f5/11406598/4d5f13c3408f/10.1177_00469580241275324-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f5/11406598/4d5f13c3408f/10.1177_00469580241275324-fig1.jpg
摘要

绩效评估对于提高医疗质量和服务水平至关重要。然而,传统中医(TCM)医院的医疗质量研究相对较少。本研究旨在评估甘肃省三级公立中医医院的医疗质量和各项指标,为提高这些医院的医疗和管理水平奠定基础。

本研究收集了甘肃省 10 所三级中医医院 2019 年至 2022 年的绩效评估数据。选取了 13 项具有中医特色的指标,并将其分为三个方面:医疗成本控制、内部运营维度和综合管理。采用 TOPSIS 法进行排名和 RSR 法进行分级,确定不同医院和不同年份的医疗质量水平。

首先,在中医特色指标方面,医院 H 在不同医院中医疗成本控制和综合管理方面得分最高,分别为 45.87%和 24.20%。不同年份中,医疗成本控制和综合管理的最高值分别出现在 2020 年,分别为 40.65%和 18.69%。采用 TOPSIS 法评估不同医院的医疗质量时,发现医院 H 在 2020 年至 2022 年的排名最高,分别为 0.725、0.778 和 0.667。此外,RSR 法表明,医院 H 在 2020 年至 2022 年的分级水平较高,分别为 0.687、0.690 和 0.723。这些发现表明,医院 H 的医疗质量处于较高且稳定的发展水平。

基于 TOPSIS 法对 2019 年至 2022 年不同医院的绩效评估结果和排名进行评估。结果表明,2019 年排名最高的是医院 B(C=0.913),2020 年排名最高的是医院 C(C=0.809),2021 年排名最高的是医院 D(C=0.689),2022 年排名最高的是医院 J(C=0.865)。RSR 法表明,2019 年分级水平较高的是医院 B(P=0.899)和 F(P=0.795),2020 年分级水平较高的是医院 C(P=0.809),2021 年分级水平较高的是医院 A(P=0.868)、D(P=0.813)、E(P=0.689)、G(P=0.873)、J(P=0.813)和 K(P=0.842),2022 年分级水平较高的是医院 B、D、E、G 和 J。

以上结果表明,不同医院的医疗质量状况在 2019 年至 2022 年期间存在较大差异。通过比较 2019 年至 2022 年 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法的结果,我们发现,在 2019 年,D 和 J 医院的医疗质量排名相同,而在 2020 年,A、B、C、E 医院的医疗质量排名差异不超过 2 分。

比较 2019 年至 2022 年 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法的排名结果,发现 B 和 F 医院在 2019 年至 2022 年的排名相同,A 和 F 医院在 2020 年的排名差异超过 2 分,C 和 G 医院在 2021 年的排名差异超过 2 分,B、D、E、G 和 J 医院在 2022 年的排名相同。比较 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法的排名结果,发现 B 和 F 医院在 2019 年至 2022 年的排名相同,A、C、D、E、G、H、J 和 K 医院的排名差异不超过 2 分,表明 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法之间具有高度一致性,结果可信。

研究结果表明,不同年份的医疗质量存在显著波动,但各医院的整体医疗质量水平保持相对稳定。建议中医医院注重提高管理效率、优化医院运营、加强医疗资源利用,促进医院的高效发展。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Medical Quality in Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals by TOPSIS and RSR Methods.基于 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法的三级甲等中医医院医疗质量特征。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241275324. doi: 10.1177/00469580241275324.
2
Evaluation of community basic public health service effect in a city in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region--based on entropy weight TOPSIS method and RSR fuzzy set.内蒙古自治区某城市社区基本公共卫生服务效果评价——基于熵权TOPSIS法和RSR模糊集
Arch Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;81(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01151-x.
3
Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China.基于 TOPSIS 和 RSR 方法组合的实验室管理评估:来自中国 7 个省级实验室的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:883551. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551. eCollection 2022.
4
The Efficiency Evaluation of Municipal-Level Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals Using Data Envelopment Analysis After the Implementation of Hierarchical Medical Treatment Policy in Gansu Province, China.中国甘肃省实施分级诊疗政策后基于数据包络分析的市级中医医院效率评价
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221095799. doi: 10.1177/00469580221095799.
5
Contribution quality evaluation of table tennis match by using TOPSIS-RSR method - an empirical study.基于TOPSIS-RSR法的乒乓球比赛贡献质量评价——实证研究
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 13;15(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00738-9.
6
Field validation of different intervention modes for the potential transmission risk of schistosomiasis during post-transmission interruption phase.现场验证不同干预模式对传播中断后期血吸虫病潜在传播风险的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Nov 6;17(11):e0011739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011739. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
A Comprehensive Evaluation of China's TCM Medical Service System: An Empirical Research by Integrated Factor Analysis and TOPSIS.中国中医医疗服务体系综合评价:基于综合因子分析和TOPSIS法的实证研究
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 29;8:532420. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.532420. eCollection 2020.
8
Resource allocation efficiency in 68 county-level traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China: a data envelopment analysis.中国 68 家县级中医医院的资源配置效率:数据包络分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e088462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088462.
9
[Precise application of Traditional Chinese Medicine in minimally-invasive techniques].[中医在微创技术中的精准应用]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jun 25;31(6):493-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.06.001.
10
Measuring Productivity and Relative Efficiency of Public Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Hubei, China.测量中国湖北省公立三级中医医院的生产力和相对效率。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231190576. doi: 10.1177/00469580231190576.

引用本文的文献

1
The cost of rehabilitation after critical illness: a comparison of hospitalization costs for traumatic brain injury and non-traumatic brain injury patients with disorders of consciousness.危重症后的康复费用:创伤性脑损伤与意识障碍的非创伤性脑损伤患者住院费用的比较。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;13:1552162. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1552162. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Regional differences in health resource allocation: a longitudinal study in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, China.地区间卫生资源配置差异:中国成渝经济圈的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 21;14(3):e082721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082721.
2
A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods.运用多准则决策分析方法对中国儿童保健工作的比较评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):1217. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10204-4.
3
Field validation of different intervention modes for the potential transmission risk of schistosomiasis during post-transmission interruption phase.
现场验证不同干预模式对传播中断后期血吸虫病潜在传播风险的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Nov 6;17(11):e0011739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011739. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Contribution quality evaluation of table tennis match by using TOPSIS-RSR method - an empirical study.基于TOPSIS-RSR法的乒乓球比赛贡献质量评价——实证研究
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 13;15(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00738-9.
5
Analysis on the Selection of Herbs in TCM COVID-19 Treatment Protocols Between Malaysia and China.马来西亚与中国中医新冠肺炎治疗方案中用药选择分析
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Aug 21;16:3655-3663. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S426168. eCollection 2023.
6
Measuring Productivity and Relative Efficiency of Public Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Hubei, China.测量中国湖北省公立三级中医医院的生产力和相对效率。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231190576. doi: 10.1177/00469580231190576.
7
Evaluation of community basic public health service effect in a city in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region--based on entropy weight TOPSIS method and RSR fuzzy set.内蒙古自治区某城市社区基本公共卫生服务效果评价——基于熵权TOPSIS法和RSR模糊集
Arch Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;81(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01151-x.
8
Identification of active compounds of traditional chinese medicine derived from maxing shigan decoction for COVID-19 treatment: a meta-analysis and in silico study.麻杏石甘汤治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的中药活性成分鉴定:一项Meta分析及计算机模拟研究
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(8):871-889. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2238899. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
9
Integrative Medicine in Long COVID.长新冠的整合医学。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2023 Aug;34(3):677-688. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Decrease of visits and hospital admissions for cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19大流行期间癌症患者就诊和住院人数的减少。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023 Mar 16:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10389-023-01857-w.