School of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China.
West China School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 25;38(2):150-157. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2022.220106.
Medical disputes are one of the common problems concerned by the whole world. All countries and regions have established their own medical dispute resolution mechanisms, in accordance with their own national conditions. Medical dispute identification opinions, as one of the important bases for identifying the responsibilities of both doctors and patients, play a pivotal role in the process of dispute settlement. A reasonable medical dispute resolution mechanism and standardized medical dispute identification model can help resolve disputes flexibly and reduce the conflict between doctors and patients. This paper briefly compares the medical dispute resolution mechanism and identification mode of China and several other representative countries (the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, etc.), and discusses their respective characteristics and shortcomings, to bring some enlightenment to the medical dispute resolution and identification in our country.
医疗纠纷是全世界共同关注的常见问题之一。各国和地区都根据自身国情建立了各自的医疗纠纷解决机制。医疗纠纷鉴定意见作为鉴定医患双方责任的重要依据之一,在纠纷解决过程中起着关键作用。合理的医疗纠纷解决机制和规范的医疗纠纷鉴定模式有助于灵活化解纠纷,减少医患矛盾。本文简要比较了中国和其他几个具有代表性的国家(美国、英国、法国、德国、意大利、日本等)的医疗纠纷解决机制和鉴定模式,并探讨了各自的特点和不足,以期对我国的医疗纠纷解决和鉴定带来一些启示。