Suppr超能文献

泊洛妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的长期生存情况:基于GO29365试验的结果

Approximation of Long-Term Survival with Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results Based on The GO29365 Trial.

作者信息

Felizzi F, Launonen Aino, Thuresson P-O

机构信息

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Jan;7(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00339-1. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To inform healthcare professionals, payers and health technology organisations of estimated survival benefits of new treatments, statistical methods can be used to model the projected clinical benefits versus costs of new interventions. This is particularly relevant for new treatments where data describing all progression events are incomplete and long-term survival outcomes are not yet established. In patients with the fast-growing B-cell cancer, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), heterogeneous clinical efficacy outcomes are observed with the presence of both 'cured' (long-term survivors [LTS]) and 'non-cured' patients. Mixture cure rate models represent an alternative approach to traditional standard parametric survival models as they capture this heterogeneity. The aim of this analysis was to use progression-free survival (PFS) as an intermediate endpoint to estimate long-term survival with polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) + bendamustine (B) + rituximab (R) treatment (Pola+BR); these survival estimates will be utilised to inform future economic analyses.

METHODS

Using data from the Phase II randomised cohort of the GO29365 trial (NCT02257567), we estimated the overall survival (OS) benefit and proportion of LTS with Pola+BR versus BR alone in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Alongside standard parametric survival models, a mixture cure rate model was evaluated for each treatment arm, exploring both OS and OS informed by PFS.

RESULTS

The estimated mean OS was 3.78 years for Pola+BR versus 1.07 years for BR using standard parametric methods and 4.00 years versus 1.02 years using a mixture cure rate model (OS informed by PFS). The proportion of LTS using the mixture cure rate model was 23.0% (95% confidence interval: 9.3, 45.36) for Pola+BR versus 0% for BR (assuming a generalised gamma distribution). Of the extrapolation methods tested, mixture cure rate model predictions were best aligned with the observed survival data in GO29365.

CONCLUSIONS

These models suggest that compared with BR alone, Pola+BR is associated with a higher proportion of LTS ranging from 22.0 to 26.6%, depending on the distribution assumed. However, the upper and lower limits of the confidence intervals of the point estimates are reaching from 9 to 45%.

摘要

背景

为了让医疗保健专业人员、支付方和健康技术组织了解新疗法的估计生存获益,可使用统计方法来模拟新干预措施的预计临床获益与成本。这对于那些描述所有进展事件的数据不完整且长期生存结果尚未确定的新疗法尤为重要。在快速发展的B细胞癌——弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中,观察到了“治愈”(长期生存者[LTS])和“未治愈”患者并存的异质性临床疗效结果。混合治愈率模型是传统标准参数生存模型的一种替代方法,因为它们能够捕捉这种异质性。本分析的目的是使用无进展生存期(PFS)作为中间终点,来估计泊洛妥珠单抗维达汀(Pola)+苯达莫司汀(B)+利妥昔单抗(R)治疗(Pola+BR)的长期生存情况;这些生存估计值将用于为未来的经济分析提供信息。

方法

利用GO29365试验(NCT02257567)II期随机队列的数据,我们估计了复发/难治性(R/R)DLBCL患者中Pola+BR与单纯BR相比的总生存期(OS)获益和LTS比例。除了标准参数生存模型外,还对每个治疗组评估了混合治愈率模型,同时探讨了OS和由PFS得出的OS。

结果

使用标准参数方法时,Pola+BR的估计平均OS为3.78年,而BR为1.07年;使用混合治愈率模型(由PFS得出的OS)时,分别为4.00年和1.02年。使用混合治愈率模型时,Pola+BR的LTS比例为23.0%(95%置信区间:9.3,45.36),而BR为0%(假设为广义伽马分布)。在测试的外推方法中,混合治愈率模型的预测与GO29365中观察到的生存数据最吻合。

结论

这些模型表明,与单纯BR相比,Pola+BR的LTS比例更高,根据假设的分布,范围在22.0%至26.6%之间。然而,点估计的置信区间上限和下限在9%至45%之间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ac/9928994/ecf1ac08c798/41669_2022_339_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验