Suppr超能文献

将发展纳入研究领域标准(RDoC)框架:特刊介绍。

Integrating development into the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework: Introduction to the special section.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022 Aug;131(6):535-541. doi: 10.1037/abn0000767.

Abstract

The goal of this Special Section is to highlight the generativity of taking a developmental perspective toward the RDoC framework that considers developmental processes and principles and the environmental and contextual processes relevant at different ages and developmental stages. The 9 papers in this Special Section and 2 invited commentaries exemplify and highlight sophisticated efforts to integrate development and principles of developmental psychopathology into the RDoC framework. In so doing, the papers both demonstrate how a developmental perspective can bolster strengths of the RDoC approach and identify notable gaps and shortcomings in how the RDoC framework, assumptions, and constructs are currently conceptualized. There are critical tensions between conducting developmentally informed and informative RDoC research. Our measures and research designs are often outstripped by the challenge of testing our ambitious ideas. Examining the causal transactions between individual differences in RDoC dimensions and normative maturational tasks, supportive and hindering contexts, and the potential moderation of associations by developmental history will produce important information about the development, manifestation, and course of psychopathology. Addressing these gaps holds great potential for identifying preventive-intervention targets, impactful intervention settings, and environmental and contextual supports. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本特刊的目标是强调从发展视角看待 RDoC 框架的生成性,该视角考虑了不同年龄和发展阶段相关的发展过程和原则以及环境和背景过程。本特刊中的 9 篇论文和 2 篇特邀评论体现并突出了将发展和发展心理病理学原则纳入 RDoC 框架的复杂努力。这样做的同时,这些论文既展示了发展视角如何增强 RDoC 方法的优势,又指出了 RDoC 框架、假设和结构目前在概念化方面的明显差距和不足之处。在开展具有发展意义和信息量的 RDoC 研究方面存在着关键的紧张关系。我们的测量和研究设计往往无法跟上测试我们雄心勃勃的想法的挑战。研究 RDoC 维度个体差异与正常成熟任务、支持和阻碍环境之间的因果关系,以及发展历史对关联的潜在调节作用,将为精神病理学的发展、表现和过程提供重要信息。解决这些差距对于确定预防干预目标、有影响力的干预环境以及环境和背景支持具有巨大潜力。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

6
Developmental Psychopathology and the Research Domain Criteria: Friend or Foe?发展心理病理学与研究领域标准:是敌是友?
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;49(3):341-352. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1753205.
9

本文引用的文献

5
The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Aging: An overview.衰老中的全生命周期人类连接组计划:概述。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:335-348. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.青少年大脑认知发展研究
J Res Adolesc. 2018 Mar;28(1):154-156. doi: 10.1111/jora.12374.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验