Lechner M, Liu J, Counsell N, Gillespie D, Chandrasekharan D, Ta N H, Jumani K, Gupta R, Rao-Merugumala S, Rocke J, Williams C, Tetteh A, Amnolsingh R, Khwaja S, Batterham R L, Yan C H, Treibel T A, Moon J C, Woods J, Brunton R, Boardman J, Paun S, Eynon-Lewis N, Kumar B N, Jayaraj S, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Lund V J
ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Rhinology. 2022 Jun 1;60(3):188-199. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.470.
Olfactory dysfunction is a cardinal symptom of COVID-19 infection, however, studies assessing long-term olfactory dysfunction are limited and no randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of early olfactory training have been conducted.
We conducted a prospective, multi-centre study consisting of baseline psychophysical measurements of smell and taste function. Eligible participants were further recruited into a 12-week RCT of olfactory training versus control (safety information). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using an electronic survey and BSIT at baseline and 12 weeks. An additional 1-year follow-up was open to all participants.
218 individuals with a sudden loss of sense of smell of at least 4-weeks were recruited. Psychophysical smell loss was observed in only 32.1%; 63 participants were recruited into the RCT. The absolute difference in BSIT improvement after 12 weeks was 0.45 higher in the intervention arm. 76 participants completed 1-year follow-up; 10/19 (52.6%) of participants with an abnormal baseline BSIT test scored below the normal threshold at 1-year, and 24/29 (82.8%) had persistent parosmia.
Early olfactory training may be helpful, although our findings are inconclusive. Notably, a number of individuals who completed the 1-year assessment had persistent smell loss and parosmia at 1-year. As such, both should be considered important entities of long-Covid and further studies to improve management are highly warranted.
嗅觉功能障碍是新冠病毒感染的主要症状,然而,评估长期嗅觉功能障碍的研究有限,且尚未开展早期嗅觉训练的随机对照试验(RCT)。
我们开展了一项前瞻性、多中心研究,包括对嗅觉和味觉功能进行基线心理物理学测量。符合条件的参与者被进一步招募到一项为期12周的嗅觉训练与对照(安全信息)RCT中。在基线和12周时,使用电子调查问卷和嗅棒嗅觉识别测试(BSIT)来测量患者报告的结果。所有参与者均可进行额外的1年随访。
招募了218名嗅觉突然丧失至少4周的个体。仅32.1%观察到心理物理学嗅觉丧失;63名参与者被纳入RCT。干预组在12周后嗅棒嗅觉识别测试改善的绝对差异高0.45。76名参与者完成了1年随访;基线嗅棒嗅觉识别测试异常的参与者中,19人中有10人(52.6%)在1年时得分低于正常阈值,29人中有24人(82.8%)存在持续性嗅觉倒错。
早期嗅觉训练可能有帮助,尽管我们的研究结果尚无定论。值得注意的是,一些完成1年评估的个体在1年时仍存在持续性嗅觉丧失和嗅觉倒错。因此,两者都应被视为长期新冠的重要症状,非常有必要开展进一步研究以改善管理。