Suppr超能文献

持续性 COVID-19 嗅觉异常和嗅觉训练后嗅觉丧失:比较中枢和外周作用治疗药物的随机临床试验。

Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Department of Otolaryngology, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Fano, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3671-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08548-6. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although COVID-19 anosmia is often transient, patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction (pOD) can experience refractory parosmia and diminished smell. This study evaluated four putative therapies for parosmia in patients with chronic COVID-19 olfactory impairment.

METHODS

After screening nasal endoscopy, 85 patients (49 female, 58%) with pOD and treatment-refractory parosmia were randomized to: (1) ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide and luteolin + olfactory training (OT) (umPEALUT group, n = 17), (2) alpha-lipoic acid + OT (ALA group, n = 21), (3) umPEALUT + ALA + OT (combination group, n = 28), or 4) olfactory training (OT) alone (control group, n = 23). Olfactory function was assessed at baseline (T) and 6 months (T) using a parosmia questionnaire and Sniffin' Sticks test of odor threshold, detection, and identification (TDI). Analyses included one-way ANOVA for numeric data and Chi-Square analyses for nominal data on parosmia.

RESULTS

The umPEALUT group had the largest improvement in TDI scores (21.8 ± 9.4 to 29.7 ± 7.5) followed by the combination group (19.6 ± 6.29 to 27.5 ± 2.7), both p < 0.01. The control and ALA groups had no significant change. Patients in the combination and umPEALUT groups had significantly improved TDI scores compared to ALA and control groups (p < 0.001). Rates of parosmia resolution after 6 months were reported at 96% for combination, 65% for control, 53% for umPEALUT and 29% for ALA (p < 0.001). All treatment regimens were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

umPEALUT and OT, with or without ALA, was associated with improvement in TDI scores and parosmia, whereas OT alone or OT with ALA were associated with little benefit.

摘要

目的

尽管 COVID-19 嗅觉丧失通常是短暂的,但持续性嗅觉障碍(pOD)患者可能会经历难治性幻嗅和嗅觉减退。本研究评估了四种用于治疗慢性 COVID-19 嗅觉障碍患者幻嗅的潜在疗法。

方法

鼻内镜筛查后,85 名(49 名女性,58%)pOD 伴治疗抵抗性幻嗅的患者被随机分为:(1)超微化棕榈酸乙酯和叶黄素+嗅觉训练(OT)(umPEALUT 组,n=17),(2)α-硫辛酸+OT(ALA 组,n=21),(3)umPEALUT+ALA+OT(联合组,n=28),或 4)嗅觉训练(OT)单独(对照组,n=23)。使用幻嗅问卷和嗅敏度、检测和识别(TDI)的嗅觉测试棒,在基线(T)和 6 个月(T)时评估嗅觉功能。分析包括数值数据的单向方差分析和名义数据的卡方分析。

结果

umPEALUT 组 TDI 评分改善最大(21.8±9.4 至 29.7±7.5),其次是联合组(19.6±6.29 至 27.5±2.7),均 p<0.01。对照组和 ALA 组没有显著变化。联合组和 umPEALUT 组的 TDI 评分显著优于 ALA 组和对照组(p<0.001)。6 个月后报告的幻嗅缓解率分别为联合组 96%、对照组 65%、umPEALUT 组 53%和 ALA 组 29%(p<0.001)。所有治疗方案均耐受良好。

结论

umPEALUT 和 OT,联合或不联合 ALA,与 TDI 评分和幻嗅改善相关,而 OT 单独或 OT 联合 ALA 则获益甚微。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ec/11211159/97ce26a1ff54/405_2024_8548_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验