Suppr超能文献

家庭无烟政策随儿童年龄变化:城市、农村和郊区的差异。

Home Smoke-Free Policies as Children Age: Urban, Rural, and Suburban Differences.

机构信息

UT Health Science Center at Houston, UT Health, School of Public Health in Austin, 1616 Guadalupe, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Nov 12;24(12):1985-1993. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac186.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parents/guardians can effectively reduce tobacco smoking and secondhand smoke exposure among youth by adopting and enforcing rules against indoor tobacco smoking (ie, home smoke-free policies). We investigate home smoke-free policies from childhood to adolescence in the United States and across rural, suburban, and urban households.

AIMS AND METHODS

We analyzed 2019-2020 National Survey of Children's Health data from n = 5,955 parents of youth aged 0-17, living at home with a tobacco smoker in the United States (U.S). Geographical categories were: rural, suburban, and urban. Home smoke-free policy reflected prohibiting tobacco smoking inside the home. Weighted logistic regressions examined the (1) association between youth age and home smoke-free policies, (2) interaction between geographic category and youth age, and (3) differing associations between youth age and home smoke-free policies by geography. Models controlled for youth race, ethnicity, sex, parental education, household annual income, and home structure.

RESULTS

Approximately 13.2% of U.S. households with a smoker did not have a home smoke-free policy. Stratified analyses found one-year increase in youth age was associated with lower odds of having a home smoke-free policy in rural (aOR:0.91; 95%CI: 0.87-0.95) and urban (aOR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.92-1.00; p = .039), but not suburban (aOR:1.00; 95%CI: 0.95-1.05) households, controlling for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Odds of having a smoke-free home in the U.S. declined significantly in rural (9% per year) and urban (4%) but not suburban (0%) households. We quantify declines in home smoke-free policies as children age and identify geographic disparities for this environmental determinant of health.

IMPLICATIONS

Health promotion efforts targeting secondhand smoke prevention is needed, particularly for parents of older youth. Furthermore, there is a clear geographic bias in secondhand smoke exposure among all youth particularly older youth. Tailored interventions are needed to address geographic disparities in secondhand smoke exposure among rural and urban youth.

摘要

引言

父母/监护人可以通过制定和执行禁止室内吸烟(即家庭无烟政策)的规定,有效地减少青少年吸烟和二手烟暴露。我们调查了美国农村、郊区和城市家庭中从儿童期到青春期的家庭无烟政策。

目的和方法

我们分析了来自美国 2019-2020 年全国儿童健康调查的数据,该调查涉及 5955 名家中有吸烟者的 0-17 岁青少年的父母。地理类别为:农村、郊区和城市。家庭无烟政策反映了禁止在家中吸烟。加权逻辑回归检验了以下内容:(1)青少年年龄与家庭无烟政策之间的关系;(2)地理类别与青少年年龄之间的相互作用;(3)不同地理区域中青少年年龄与家庭无烟政策之间的关联差异。模型控制了青少年的种族、民族、性别、父母教育程度、家庭年收入和家庭结构。

结果

约有 13.2%的美国家庭有吸烟者但没有家庭无烟政策。分层分析发现,青少年年龄每增加一岁,农村(调整后的比值比[aOR]:0.91;95%置信区间[CI]:0.87-0.95)和城市(aOR:0.96;95%CI:0.92-1.00;p =.039)家庭拥有无烟家庭政策的可能性降低,但郊区(aOR:1.00;95%CI:0.95-1.05)家庭则不然,控制了协变量。

结论

在美国,农村(每年 9%)和城市(每年 4%)家庭中拥有无烟家庭的可能性显著下降,但郊区(每年 0%)家庭则不然。我们量化了随着儿童年龄增长而无烟家庭政策的下降,并确定了健康的这一环境决定因素在所有年龄段的青少年中存在地理差异。

意义

需要针对二手烟预防开展健康促进工作,特别是针对年龄较大的青少年的父母。此外,所有青少年,特别是年龄较大的青少年,都存在明显的地理上的二手烟暴露差异。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,解决农村和城市青少年之间二手烟暴露的地理差异。

相似文献

1
Home Smoke-Free Policies as Children Age: Urban, Rural, and Suburban Differences.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Nov 12;24(12):1985-1993. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac186.
3
Household Implementation of Smoke-Free Rules in Homes and Cars: A Focus on Adolescent Smoking Behavior and Secondhand Smoke Exposure.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776901. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
Strict smoke-free home policies among smoking parents in pediatric settings.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.003.
5
Prevalence and correlates of secondhand smoke exposure in the home and in a vehicle among youth in the United States.
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105745. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
The impact of tobacco control policies on disparities in children's secondhand smoke exposure: a comparison of methods.
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16 Suppl 1:S70-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0996-9.
8
Variations in support for secondhand smoke restrictions across diverse rural regions of the United States.
Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Area Deprivation Index and Rurality in Relation to Lung Cancer Prevalence and Mortality in a Rural State.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Mar 7;4(4):pkaa011. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa011. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Changes in urban and rural cigarette smoking and cannabis use from 2007 to 2017 in adults in the United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107699. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107699. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
6
The Rural Hospital Problem.
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2271-2272. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7377.
7
Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1294-1304. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz032.
8
Disparities in Rural Tobacco Use, Smoke-Free Policies, and Tobacco Taxes.
West J Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;41(8):1184-1202. doi: 10.1177/0193945919828061. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
9
Public Support for Smoke-Free Section 8 Public Housing.
West J Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;41(8):1170-1183. doi: 10.1177/0193945919826238. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
10
Variations in support for secondhand smoke restrictions across diverse rural regions of the United States.
Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验