Suppr超能文献

社区新发射血分数降低型心力衰竭的指南导向药物治疗。

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the Community.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2022 Oct;28(10):1500-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.07.047. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) dramatically improves outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our goal was to examine GDMT use in community patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with newly diagnosed HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) 2007-2017. We excluded patients with contraindications to medication initiation. We examined the use of beta-blockers, HF beta-blockers (metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, bisoprolol), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIS), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in the first year after HFrEF diagnosis. We used Cox models to evaluate the association of being seen in an HF clinic with the initiation of GDMT. From 2007 to 2017, 1160 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF (mean age 69.7 years, 65.6% men). Most eligible patients received beta-blockers (92.6%) and ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs (87.0%) in the first year. However, only 63.8% of patients were treated with an HF beta-blocker, and few received MRAs (17.6%). In models accounting for the role of an HF clinic in initiation of these medications, being seen in an HF clinic was independently associated with initiation of new GDMT across all medication classes, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.54 (1.15-2.06) for any beta-blocker, 2.49 (1.95-3.20) for HF beta-blockers, 1.97 (1.46-2.65) for ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs, and 2.14 (1.49-3.08) for MRAs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, most patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF received beta-blockers and ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs. GDMT use was higher in patients seen in an HF clinic, suggesting the potential benefit of referral to an HF clinic for patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF.

摘要

背景

指南指导的医学治疗(GDMT)显著改善了射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的预后。我们的目标是研究新诊断为 HFrEF(EF≤40%)的社区患者中 GDMT 的使用情况。

方法和结果

我们对 2007 年至 2017 年间明尼苏达州奥姆斯特德县所有新诊断为 HFrEF(EF≤40%)的居民进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。我们排除了开始药物治疗有禁忌症的患者。我们研究了在 HFrEF 诊断后第一年β受体阻滞剂、HFβ受体阻滞剂(琥珀酸美托洛尔、卡维地洛、比索洛尔)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)、血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNIs)和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)的使用情况。我们使用 Cox 模型评估在 HF 诊所就诊与开始 GDMT 的关联。2007 年至 2017 年间,有 1160 名患者被诊断为 HFrEF(平均年龄 69.7 岁,65.6%为男性)。大多数符合条件的患者在第一年接受了β受体阻滞剂(92.6%)和 ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs(87.0%)。然而,只有 63.8%的患者接受了 HFβ受体阻滞剂治疗,很少有患者接受 MRA(17.6%)。在考虑 HF 诊所在这些药物起始中的作用的模型中,在 HF 诊所就诊与所有药物类别的新 GDMT 起始独立相关,任何β受体阻滞剂的危险比(95%CI)为 1.54(1.15-2.06),HFβ受体阻滞剂为 2.49(1.95-3.20),ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs 为 1.97(1.46-2.65),MRA 为 2.14(1.49-3.08)。

结论

在这项基于人群的研究中,大多数新诊断为 HFrEF 的患者接受了β受体阻滞剂和 ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs。在 HF 诊所就诊的患者中 GDMT 的使用率更高,这表明对于新诊断为 HFrEF 的患者,将其转介到 HF 诊所可能会带来潜在的益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
The management of heart failure in Sweden-the physician's perspective: a survey.瑞典心力衰竭的管理——医生视角:一项调查
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 14;11:1385281. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1385281. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Advanced Heart Failure: A Population-Based Study.进展性心力衰竭的发生:一项基于人群的研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 May;15(5):e009218. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009218. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验