Baez Catalina, Prieto Hernan A, Tishad Abtahi, Vasilopoulos Terrie, Miley Emilie N, Deen Justin T, Gray Chancellor F, Parvataneni Hari K, Pulido Luis
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4645. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164645.
: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. : A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. : A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group ( < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU ( < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate ( = 0.029), fewer falls ( = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge ( < 0.001) than RNB. : In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.
与单一疗法相比,全髋关节置换术(THA)中的多模式镇痛可提供更好的疼痛控制、活动能力,并减少副作用。在这些方案中,局部浸润镇痛(LIA)和区域神经阻滞(RNBs)被普遍使用。本研究旨在比较这些方法作为THA患者多模式镇痛方案的一部分的效果。:对2018年6月至2021年12月期间996例患者连续进行的1100例择期初次THA进行回顾性分析。RNB包括术前连续股神经导管和单次闭孔神经阻滞,LIA包括术中按体重浸润布比卡因。:共有579例(52.6%)患者接受了RNB,521例(47.4%)接受了LIA。LIA组术后前四小时的平均口服吗啡当量(OMEs)显著更低(<0.001)。然而,两组在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)的数字疼痛评分量表相似。与RNB相比,LIA患者在PACU的首次行走距离显著更远(<0.001),当日成功出院率更高(=0.029),跌倒次数更少(=0.041),出院后补充OMEs更少(<0.001)。:在两组疼痛管理相似且LIA功能结局更好的情况下,在THA后使用LIA等微创方法进行疼痛控制是有利的。