• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪种类型的 Facebook 帖子能获得放射科教育的最佳反馈:我们在一年中学到的东西。

Which Types of Facebook Posts Yield the Best Response for Radiology Education: A One-Year Analysis of What We Learned.

机构信息

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287.

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.023. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.023
PMID:35902293
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We post several times daily on our Facebook page, CTisus, to educate radiology students and professionals globally. We aimed to determine how our data compared for different types of posts and ascertain the popularity of videos versus case images, illustrations versus case images, and whether cinematic rendering performed better than traditional computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We exported data for one year's worth of Facebook posts (November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021) and categorized posts into 18 types. Our primary outcome was popularity of each post, measured by "reach" and "engagement" counts provided by Facebook.

RESULTS

Among the 9057 posts exported, "just for fun" posts performed the best, followed by quiz images. Case images performed significantly better than instructional videos (p < 0.0001). However, the opposite was true for engagement, where instructional videos performed significantly better than case images (p = 0.0012). For both reach and engagement, case images performed better than medical illustrations (p < 0.0001). For both reach (p < 0.0005) and engagement (p < 0.0001), traditional computed tomography performed significantly better than cinematic rendering. All video types had better engagement than case images and medical illustrations (p < 0.0001) and both had significantly better engagement than text (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results may help other educators choose what types of content to create and post on social media to achieve the best impact on learners.

摘要

背景与目的

我们在 CTisus 脸书页面上每日发布多次内容,以向全球的放射科学生和专业人士提供教育。我们旨在确定我们的数据在不同类型的帖子中的表现,并确定视频与病例图像、插图与病例图像的受欢迎程度,以及电影渲染是否优于传统计算机断层扫描。

材料与方法

我们导出了一年的脸书帖子数据(2020 年 11 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日),并将帖子分为 18 种类型。我们的主要结果是每个帖子的受欢迎程度,通过脸书提供的“触及”和“参与”计数来衡量。

结果

在导出的 9057 个帖子中,“仅供娱乐”的帖子表现最好,其次是测验图片。病例图像的表现明显优于教学视频(p < 0.0001)。然而,参与度的情况则相反,教学视频的表现明显优于病例图像(p = 0.0012)。无论是触及还是参与度,病例图像的表现均优于医学插图(p < 0.0001)。对于触及和参与度,病例图像的表现均优于传统计算机断层扫描(p < 0.0005)。所有视频类型的参与度均高于病例图像和医学插图(p < 0.0001),且均明显高于文本(p < 0.0001)。

结论

我们的结果可能有助于其他教育工作者选择要在社交媒体上创建和发布的内容类型,以实现对学习者的最佳影响。

相似文献

1
Which Types of Facebook Posts Yield the Best Response for Radiology Education: A One-Year Analysis of What We Learned.哪种类型的 Facebook 帖子能获得放射科教育的最佳反馈:我们在一年中学到的东西。
Acad Radiol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.023. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Lessons learned from rebranding a radiology education facebook page.从放射科教育 Facebook 页面重塑品牌中学到的经验教训。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2024 Nov-Dec;53(6):685-688. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Facebook Live: One Year of Traditional Discussions vs. Case Conferences.脸书直播:传统讨论与病例研讨会一年对比
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022 Jul-Aug;51(4):431-433. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Generating Engagement on the Make Healthy Normal Campaign Facebook Page: Analysis of Facebook Analytics.在“让健康成为常态”运动脸书页面上激发互动:脸书分析报告
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Jan 14;5(1):e11132. doi: 10.2196/11132.
5
Click "like" to change your behavior: a mixed methods study of college students' exposure to and engagement with Facebook content designed for weight loss.点击“点赞”改变你的行为:一项关于大学生接触及参与Facebook减肥相关内容的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 24;16(6):e158. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3267.
6
Is a Picture Really Worth More than a Thousand Words? Which Instagram Post Types Elicit the Best Response for Radiology Education.一张图片真的胜过千言万语吗?哪种类型的 Instagram 帖子能为放射科教育带来最佳反响。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Aug;33(4):1053-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00344-y.
7
Use of Facebook by Academic Medical Centers in Taiwan During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.台湾地区学术医学中心在新冠疫情期间对脸书的使用:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 20;22(11):e21501. doi: 10.2196/21501.
8
Radiology on Instagram: Analysis of Public Accounts and Identified Areas for Content Creation.放射科在 Instagram 上:公共账户分析和内容创作领域。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Jan;29(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
The role of Facebook in Crush the Crave, a mobile- and social media-based smoking cessation intervention: qualitative framework analysis of posts.脸书在“战胜烟瘾”(一项基于移动和社交媒体的戒烟干预措施)中的作用:对帖子的定性框架分析
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 11;16(7):e170. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3189.
10
What are dental professionals posting on Facebook? A cross-sectional content analysis.牙科专业人员在 Facebook 上发布什么内容?一项横断面内容分析。
J Orthod. 2022 Jun;49(2):185-194. doi: 10.1177/14653125211033302. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring emotional dynamics: Word count effects in Facebook posts by sports shoe brands.探索情感动态:运动鞋品牌在脸书帖子中的字数效应。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 24;10(21):e39808. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39808. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.