Shin Ji Yeh, Kim Ha Jin, Cho BeLong, Yang Yun Jun, Yun Jae Moon
Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Institute on Aging, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Fam Med. 2022 Jul;43(4):246-253. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.21.0145. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Continuity of care in primary care settings is crucial for managing diabetes. We aimed to statistically define and analyze continuity factors associated with demographics, clinical workforce, and geographical relationships.
We used 2014-2015 National Health Insurance Service claims data from the Korean registry, with 39,096 eligible outpatient attendance. We applied multivariable logistic regression to analyze factors that may affect the continuity of care indices for each patient: the most frequent provider continuity index (MFPCI), modified-modified continuity index (MMCI), and continuity of care index (COCI).
The mean continuity of care indices were 0.90, 0.96, and 0.85 for MFPCI, MMCI and COCI, respectively. Among patient factors, old age >80 years (MFPCI: odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.89; MMCI: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; and COCI: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.89) and mild disability were strongly associated with lower continuity of care. Another significant factor was the residential area: the farther the patients lived from their primary care clinic, the lower the continuity of diabetes care (MFPCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.78; MMCI: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.73; and COCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.78).
The geographical proximity of patients' residential areas and clinic locations showed the strongest correlation as a continuity factor. Further efforts are needed to improve continuity of care to address the geographical imbalance in diabetic care.
基层医疗环境中的连续性护理对于糖尿病管理至关重要。我们旨在从统计学角度定义和分析与人口统计学、临床劳动力及地理关系相关的连续性因素。
我们使用了来自韩国登记处的2014 - 2015年国民健康保险服务索赔数据,其中有39,096例符合条件的门诊就诊病例。我们应用多变量逻辑回归分析可能影响每位患者护理连续性指标的因素:最频繁提供者连续性指数(MFPCI)、改良 - 改良连续性指数(MMCI)和护理连续性指数(COCI)。
MFPCI、MMCI和COCI的护理连续性指数均值分别为0.90、0.96和0.85。在患者因素中,80岁以上高龄(MFPCI:比值比[OR],0.81;95%置信区间[CI],0.74 - 0.89;MMCI:OR,0.84;95% CI,0.76 - 0.92;COCI:OR,0.81;95% CI,0.74 - 0.89)和轻度残疾与较低的护理连续性密切相关。另一个重要因素是居住地区:患者居住距离基层医疗诊所越远,糖尿病护理的连续性越低(MFPCI:OR,0.74;95% CI,0.70 - 0.78;MMCI:OR,0.70;95% CI,0.66 - 0.73;COCI:OR,0.74;95% CI,0.70 - 0.78)。
患者居住地区与诊所位置的地理接近度作为连续性因素显示出最强的相关性。需要进一步努力改善护理连续性,以解决糖尿病护理中的地理不平衡问题。