• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Testing: A Qualitative Study Exploring Enablers and Barriers in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana.COVID-19 检测:加纳大阿克拉地区的一项探索促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:908410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908410. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors influencing COVID-19 testing: a qualitative study in Bhutan.影响 COVID-19 检测的因素:不丹的一项定性研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Apr 2;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00241-7.
3
Multi-sectoral collaborations in selected countries of the Eastern Mediterranean region: assessment, enablers and missed opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic response.东地中海区域选定国家的多部门协作:从 COVID-19 大流行应对中评估、促成因素和错失的机会。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 24;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01098-z.
4
Perceived impacts of COVID-19 responses on routine health service delivery in Liberia and UK: cross-country lessons for resilient health systems for equitable service delivery during pandemics.新冠疫情应对措施对利比里亚和英国常规卫生服务提供的影响:疫情期间提供公平服务的弹性卫生系统的跨国经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09162-8.
5
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
6
Lessons learned from the experiences and perspectives of frontline healthcare workers on the COVID-19 response: a qualitative descriptive study.从一线医护人员应对 COVID-19 的经验和观点中吸取的教训:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10062-0.
7
Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries.日常能力是应对 COVID-19 期间韧性的途径:五个国家的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):192-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac085.
8
Collective Intelligence-Based Participatory COVID-19 Surveillance in Accra, Ghana: Pilot Mixed Methods Study.基于集体智慧的加纳阿克拉市新冠肺炎参与式监测:试点混合方法研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Aug 12;4:e50125. doi: 10.2196/50125.
9
Lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic in selected countries to inform strengthening of public health systems: a qualitative study.从选定国家的 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的教训,以告知加强公共卫生系统:一项定性研究。
Public Health. 2023 Dec;225:343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.024. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
10
Governance, policy, and health systems responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: a qualitative study.泰国应对 COVID-19 大流行的治理、政策和卫生系统反应:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1250192. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1250192. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Marburg virus in Ghana: A public health threat to Ghanaians and to Africans.加纳的马尔堡病毒:对加纳人和非洲人的公共卫生威胁。
Public Health Chall. 2022 Nov 2;1(4):e32. doi: 10.1002/puh2.32. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Factors influencing uptake of COVID-19 diagnostics in Sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review.影响撒哈拉以南非洲地区新冠病毒诊断方法采用情况的因素:一项快速综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 20;20(3):e0305512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305512. eCollection 2025.
3
Qualitative assessment of the scale-up of COVID-19 testing network in Armenia: turning adversities into opportunities.亚美尼亚新冠病毒检测网络扩大规模的定性评估:化逆境为机遇
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21776-7.
4
COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders' opinions and perspectives on its value for case detection.尼日利亚的 COVID-19 自我检测:利益相关者对其病例检测价值的意见和看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0282570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282570. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Future pandemics: failing to prepare means preparing to fail.未来的大流行病:不做准备就意味着准备失败。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):221-222. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00056-X. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing.协同干预控制 COVID-19:大规模检测和隔离减轻了对距离的依赖。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Oct 28;17(10):e1009518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009518. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Recovered but Constrained: Narratives of Ghanaian COVID-19 Survivors Experiences and Coping Pathways of Stigma, Discrimination, Social Exclusion and Their Sequels.康复但受限:加纳 COVID-19 幸存者经历和应对污名化、歧视、社会排斥及其后果的叙述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1801-1813. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.81. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
The psychological distress and mental health disorders from COVID-19 stigmatization in Ghana.加纳因新冠疫情污名化而产生的心理困扰和心理健康障碍。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100186. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100186. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Perspectives on COVID-19 testing policies and practices: a qualitative study with scientific advisors and NHS health care workers in England.对 COVID-19 检测政策和实践的看法:一项针对英格兰科学顾问和国民保健制度卫生保健工作者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11285-8.
6
Ghana's COVID-19 response: the Black Star can do even better.加纳应对新冠疫情:黑星队能做得更好。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005569.
7
Containing the impact of COVID-19: Review of Ghana's response approach.遏制新冠疫情的影响:加纳应对措施综述。
Health Policy Technol. 2021 Mar;10(1):13-15. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.10.015. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence.传染病暴发期间参与接触者追踪的促进因素和障碍:证据快速综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0241473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241473. eCollection 2020.
9
Effectiveness of mass testing for control of COVID-19: a systematic review protocol.大规模检测对控制新冠病毒病的有效性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e040413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040413.
10
Universal health coverage necessitates a system approach: an analysis of Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) initiative in Ghana.全民健康覆盖需要系统方法:加纳基于社区的卫生规划和服务(CHPS)倡议分析。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 9;14(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0426-x.

COVID-19 检测:加纳大阿克拉地区的一项探索促进因素和障碍的定性研究。

COVID-19 Testing: A Qualitative Study Exploring Enablers and Barriers in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana.

机构信息

Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, South Korea.

Institute of Health Partners, Thimphu, Bhutan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:908410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908410. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.908410
PMID:35903391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9322666/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic is a global crisis and has reaffirmed that extensive testing along with effective tracing is still crucial to slowing transmission of the COVID-19 virus despite the rolling out of vaccines. This study explored enablers and barriers to COVID-19 testing in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. We envision lessons learned from this study could serve as a road map to strengthen the current response to COVID-19 and preparedness for future outbreaks, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

A qualitative design was undertaken to explore the phenomenon. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews with key informants with a purposively selected sample of 20 participants. Interviews were conducted using flexible semi-structured interview guides. Depending on the participant's position and involvement in COVID-19 testing, the guides were modified, and key elements were drawn from a tailored version of the WHO Health System Framework, incorporating the Essential Public Health Functions (EPHF). The interview findings were augmented by reviewing published literature.

RESULTS

Better health governance through political leadership, community participation, multisectoral collaboration, effective resource management, and information systems played a crucial role in catalyzing COVID-19 testing. The primary barriers to testing were mainly COVID-19 infodemic, inadequacy of material resources to meet growing health needs, and a lack of opportunities to have equal and easy access to testing services. Furthermore, although human resources were adequate, they were unevenly distributed across settings.

CONCLUSION

Despite rolling out vaccines against COVID-19, testing remains an important measure to control the virus. To effectively be prepared for extensive COVID-19 testing and respond to future outbreaks, the following are recommended: there should be improved political commitments, coordination, and communication with diverse actors to ensure even distribution of all resources across the country; empowerment of community members should be encouraged to develop community-oriented pandemic preparedness and management of COVID-19 infodemic; investment in strengthening capacity of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP); incorporation of health policy and systems research (HPSR) into the post-COVID-19 pandemic recovery process and future pandemic preparedness.

摘要

简介

COVID-19 大流行是一场全球性危机,它再次证实,尽管疫苗已经推出,但广泛的检测以及有效的追踪仍然是减缓 COVID-19 病毒传播的关键。本研究探讨了加纳大阿克拉地区 COVID-19 检测的促成因素和障碍。我们设想,从这项研究中吸取的经验教训可以为加强当前对 COVID-19 的应对措施以及为未来的疫情做好准备提供路线图,特别是在中低收入国家。

方法

采用定性设计来探讨这一现象。数据收集方法包括对 20 名精心挑选的关键信息员进行深入访谈。访谈采用灵活的半结构化访谈指南进行。根据参与者的职位和参与 COVID-19 检测的情况,对指南进行了修改,并从世界卫生组织卫生系统框架(纳入基本公共卫生职能)的定制版本中提取关键要素。访谈结果还通过审查已发表的文献得到了补充。

结果

通过政治领导、社区参与、多部门合作、有效的资源管理和信息系统改善卫生治理,在促进 COVID-19 检测方面发挥了关键作用。检测的主要障碍主要是 COVID-19 信息泛滥、满足不断增长的卫生需求的物质资源不足以及缺乏平等和方便获得检测服务的机会。此外,尽管人力资源充足,但它们在各地区的分布不均。

结论

尽管已经推出了 COVID-19 疫苗,但检测仍然是控制病毒的重要措施。为了有效做好广泛的 COVID-19 检测和应对未来的疫情,建议:应改善政治承诺,与不同行为者进行协调和沟通,确保全国资源的公平分配;应鼓励增强社区成员的权能,以制定以社区为导向的大流行病防备和 COVID-19 信息管理;应投资加强良好生产规范的能力;应将卫生政策和系统研究纳入 COVID-19 大流行后恢复进程和未来的大流行病防备。