Suppr超能文献

影响 COVID-19 检测的因素:不丹的一项定性研究。

Factors influencing COVID-19 testing: a qualitative study in Bhutan.

机构信息

Institute of Health Partners, Thimphu, Bhutan.

Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Apr 2;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00241-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has reaffirmed an all-knowing truth-that health is central in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. To fully control the infection in a community, accurate testing of suspected cases along with effective tracing and appropriate treatment (3Ts) is still crucial to slowing transmission of COVID-19 virus This study explored factors that influenced COVID-19 testing in Bhutan. The lessons learned from this study could serve as a roadmap to strengthen the current respond to COVID-19 and for future outbreaks, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

The study employed an exploratory qualitative design. Data collection methods included interviews with key informants with a purposively selected sample of 20 participants. The interview findings were augmented by reviewing both published literature and unpublished documents.For the analysis of qualitative interviews, a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development was conducted to analyze findings. A tailored version of the WHO Health System Framework incorporating the Essential Public Health Function was used to guide data interpretation.

RESULTS

Political will through the influence and leadership of the King of Bhutan played a crucial role in raising attention to the problem, and provision of adequate financial and technical relief to ensure that all people irrespective of their socioeconomic status do not pay to get tested of COVID-19. A compassionate leadership, Whole of Society approach is backed by the scientific community, functional health systems and community-based approaches, use of information technology for awareness creation and improved surveillance system, and fast-tracked COVID-19 testing service delivery.

CONCLUSION

Bhutan's success relied greatly on multi-sectoral and systematic approach during policy design, implementation and monitoring, and active collaborative efforts involving consultation and engagements with a broad range of local (community members), national and global actors for accelerated COVID-19 testing. These efforts were made possible through improved health governance and leadership at all levels of the society.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行再次证实了一个全知的真理,即健康是 2030 年可持续发展议程的核心。要在社区中全面控制感染,对疑似病例进行准确检测,同时进行有效的追踪和适当的治疗(3Ts)仍然是减缓 COVID-19 病毒传播的关键。本研究探讨了影响不丹 COVID-19 检测的因素。从这项研究中吸取的经验教训可以为加强当前对 COVID-19 的应对措施以及未来的疫情,特别是在中低收入国家提供一个路线图。

方法

本研究采用探索性定性设计。数据收集方法包括对关键信息员进行访谈,选择了 20 名参与者进行有针对性的抽样。访谈结果通过审查已发表的文献和未发表的文件得到补充。为了分析定性访谈,采用了归纳和演绎编码以及主题开发的混合方法来分析结果。使用了经过定制的包含基本公共卫生职能的世界卫生组织卫生系统框架版本来指导数据解释。

结果

不丹国王的影响力和领导力带来的政治意愿在提高对该问题的重视以及提供充足的财政和技术援助方面发挥了关键作用,以确保所有人民,无论其社会经济地位如何,都无需付费接受 COVID-19 检测。富有同情心的领导层,全社会方法得到了科学界、功能健全的卫生系统和社区方法的支持,利用信息技术进行宣传和改善监测系统,并快速提供 COVID-19 检测服务。

结论

不丹的成功在很大程度上依赖于政策设计、实施和监测过程中的多部门和系统性方法,以及与广泛的当地(社区成员)、国家和全球行为体进行协商和接触的积极协作努力,以加速 COVID-19 检测。这些努力通过改善各级社会的卫生治理和领导力成为可能。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing COVID-19 testing: a qualitative study in Bhutan.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Apr 2;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00241-7.
2
COVID-19 Testing: A Qualitative Study Exploring Enablers and Barriers in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:908410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908410. eCollection 2022.
3
Governance, policy, and health systems responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: a qualitative study.
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1250192. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1250192. eCollection 2024.
4
Lessons and Best Practices on Risk Communication and Infodemic Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan.
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2023 Jan-Jun;12(1):71-77. doi: 10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_163_22.
6
COVID-19 Data Utilization in North Carolina: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Experiences.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 2;7(9):e29310. doi: 10.2196/29310.
9
The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Dec 22;104(2):441-445. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1416.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 knowledge, attitude, and practice in combating TB and COVID-19 in Cameroon.
J Public Health Afr. 2025 May 14;16(1):717. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.717. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors influencing uptake of COVID-19 diagnostics in Sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 20;20(3):e0305512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305512. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessment of public health laboratory preparedness and response in WHO South-East Asia region during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and future directions.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Oct 19;31:100496. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100496. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 testing in community and clinical settings: Lessons learned from Lesotho and Zambia.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;3(10):e0002430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002430. eCollection 2023.
6
Prospect of herbal medication as prevention against COVID variants.
J King Saud Univ Sci. 2023 Jan;35(1):102360. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102360. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
Comparison of Saliva and Midturbinate Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0012822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00128-22. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Bhutan's experience with COVID-19 vaccination in 2021.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005977.
2
Challenges and Response to the Second Major Local Outbreak of COVID-19 in Bhutan.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2021 Nov;33(8):953-955. doi: 10.1177/10105395211007607. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines: production, affordability, allocation, and deployment.
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):1023-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00306-8. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
4
The challenges of COVID-19 testing in Africa: the Ethiopian experience.
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jan 5;38:6. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.6.26902. eCollection 2021.
5
Combating the COVID-19 infodemic: a three-level approach for low and middle-income countries.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004671.
7
Challenges to testing COVID-19 in conflict zones: Yemen as an example.
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010375. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010375.
8
Access to lifesaving medical resources for African countries: COVID-19 testing and response, ethics, and politics.
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1735-1738. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31093-X. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
National Response to COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea and Lessons Learned for Other Countries.
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):e1753464. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2020.1753464.
10
Supporting the production of pharmaceuticals in Africa.
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jan 1;94(1):71-2. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.163782. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验