• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。

Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.

机构信息

Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, College of Natural Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8
PMID:39107756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11302091/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The profound impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to an increased demand for sustainable pandemic governance practices. This study explored emerging hybrid governance practices that provide robust evidence on how to address the complex challenges of pandemics effectively. South Korea, which was severely affected by COVID-19, has implemented a novel governance approach using a whole-of-nation (WoN) model. This hybrid pandemic governance approach, which integrates both whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, has enabled synergistic and cohesive multi-sectoral coordination among all stakeholders (public authorities, private enterprises, and civil society) to address multifaceted challenges collectively and strengthen their resilience capacity. This study investigated South Korea's WoN practices and their embedded context and identified key governance enablers facilitating this approach.

METHODS

This study employed a case study design based on an extensive analysis of policy and program documents, drawing on South Korea's publicly available data from January 1, 2020 to March 30, 2023. It assessed six system-level collaborative pandemic governance practices and key enablers, all of which were intended to fortify the country's pandemic response.

RESULTS

The primary areas of the country's WoN governance practices for COVID-19 control were (i) whole-of-government policy-making and response, (ii) COVID-19 testing system, (iii) digital surveillance of COVID-19, (iv) COVID-19 triage and treatment system, (v) domestic vaccine production, and (vi) community engagement. Key governance enablers for implementing the WoN model were establishing a legal foundation, ensuring decisive and strong governance and leadership, increasing public investment, applying a whole-of-health approach with augmented investment in public health, enhancing crisis communication, and mobilizing local leaders and civil society organizations in the national public health response.

CONCLUSIONS

In exploring innovative approaches to pandemic governance for increased efficacy, responsiveness, and impact, the WoN approach emerged as highly relevant. This example of emerging practice allows policy-makers to re-evaluate their governance strategies and initiatives to improve multi-agency partnerships across the country in their pandemic-preparedness planning.

摘要

背景

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的深远影响导致人们对可持续大流行治理实践的需求增加。本研究探讨了新兴的混合治理实践,为有效应对大流行的复杂挑战提供了有力证据。韩国曾深受 COVID-19 的影响,采用了一种全新的治理方法,即全民(WoN)模式。这种混合的大流行治理方法整合了全政府和全社会的方法,使所有利益相关者(公共当局、私营企业和民间社会)能够协同和协调地开展多部门合作,共同应对多方面的挑战,并增强其恢复能力。本研究调查了韩国的 WoN 实践及其嵌入的背景,并确定了促进这种方法的关键治理推动者。

方法

本研究采用基于案例的研究设计,对政策和计划文件进行了广泛分析,并利用韩国 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 30 日公开的数据。它评估了六个系统层面的协作大流行治理实践和关键推动者,所有这些都是为了加强该国的大流行应对。

结果

韩国控制 COVID-19 的 WoN 治理实践的主要领域是(i)全政府的决策和应对,(ii)COVID-19 检测系统,(iii)COVID-19 的数字监测,(iv)COVID-19 的分诊和治疗系统,(v)国内疫苗生产,以及(vi)社区参与。实施 WoN 模式的关键治理推动者包括建立法律基础,确保果断和强有力的治理和领导,增加公共投资,应用整体健康方法,增加对公共卫生的投资,加强危机沟通,并在国家公共卫生应对中动员地方领导人和民间社会组织。

结论

在探索提高疗效、响应能力和影响力的大流行治理创新方法时,WoN 方法非常相关。这种新兴实践的例子使政策制定者能够重新评估他们的治理策略和举措,以改善全国范围内的多机构伙伴关系,为大流行做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8331/11302091/2576048a1d66/12889_2024_19655_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8331/11302091/2576048a1d66/12889_2024_19655_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8331/11302091/2576048a1d66/12889_2024_19655_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
2
Six Pivotal Lessons Learned in South Korea for Whole-of-Government Approach to Successful COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Planetary Health.在行星健康领域,韩国采取的政府整体措施在成功推出 COVID-19 疫苗方面汲取的六大关键经验。
OMICS. 2022 Oct;26(10):567-579. doi: 10.1089/omi.2022.0064. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理政府倡议。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e116. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e116.
4
Systematic assessment of South Korea's capabilities to control COVID-19.韩国控制 COVID-19 能力的系统评估。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):568-576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore.通过跨部门合作迈向共同目标:新加坡从 SARS 到 COVID-19 的经验教训。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 21;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x.
6
Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis.了解韩国应对 COVID-19 疫情的情况:实时分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249571.
7
Capacity and crisis: examining the state-level policy response to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu, India.能力与危机:审视印度泰米尔纳德邦针对新冠疫情的州级政策应对措施
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):153-164. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae096.
8
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic for future epidemics and pandemics preparedness and response in Guinea: Findings from a scoping review.从 COVID-19 大流行中汲取教训,为几内亚未来的疫情和大流行防范与应对做准备:来自范围综述的研究结果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:879850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879850. eCollection 2022.
9
Developing technical support and strategic dialogue at the country level to achieve Primary Health Care-based health systems beyond the COVID-19 era.在国家层面上制定技术支持和战略对话,以在 COVID-19 时代之外实现基于初级卫生保健的卫生系统。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;11:1102325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102325. eCollection 2023.
10
South Korea's responses to stop the COVID-19 pandemic.韩国应对新冠疫情大流行的措施。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Sep;48(9):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Synergising universal health coverage and global health security in the Western Pacific Region.在西太平洋地区协同推进全民健康覆盖与全球卫生安全。
J Glob Health. 2025 Feb 14;15:04037. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04037.

本文引用的文献

1
Health financing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for universal health care: a case study of 15 countries.新冠大流行期间的卫生筹资政策及其对全民健康覆盖的影响:15 个国家的案例研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Dec;11(12):e1964-e1977. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00448-5.
2
COVID-19 vaccine communication and advocacy strategy: a social marketing campaign for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in South Korea.新冠病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗沟通与宣传策略:韩国一项提高COVID-19疫苗接种率的社会营销活动
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):109. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01593-2. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore.
通过跨部门合作迈向共同目标:新加坡从 SARS 到 COVID-19 的经验教训。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 21;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x.
4
Six Pivotal Lessons Learned in South Korea for Whole-of-Government Approach to Successful COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Planetary Health.在行星健康领域,韩国采取的政府整体措施在成功推出 COVID-19 疫苗方面汲取的六大关键经验。
OMICS. 2022 Oct;26(10):567-579. doi: 10.1089/omi.2022.0064. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
A Transient Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in a Patient with Severe Covonavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report.康复期血浆疗法对一名重症2019冠状病毒病患者的短暂疗效:一例报告
Infect Chemother. 2022 Sep;54(3):553-558. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.0089. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Whole of government and whole of society approaches: call for further research to improve population health and health equity.政府整体与社会整体应对方式:呼吁开展进一步研究以改善人群健康和健康公平性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jul;7(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009972.
7
The Tragedy of Liberal Democratic Governance in the Face of Global Threats.面对全球威胁的自由民主治理的悲剧。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:902724. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902724. eCollection 2022.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Public Health Financing and Responses to COVID-19: Lessons from South Korea.公共卫生融资与对新冠肺炎疫情的应对:来自韩国的经验教训
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;10(4):750. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040750.
10
COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries.COVID-19 与十个国家的医疗体系韧性
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1314-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01750-1. Epub 2022 Mar 14.