• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复事件证人的可信度取决于他们的诚实度。

The perceived credibility of repeated-event witnesses depends upon their veracity.

作者信息

Deck Sarah L, Paterson Helen M

机构信息

The School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Sep 29;29(4):577-592. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1956382. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2021.1956382
PMID:35903504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9318215/
Abstract

For repeated crimes like domestic violence and workplace bullying, the primary evidence is often the alleged victim's testimony. Consequently, the perceived credibility of repeated event speakers can be pivotal to legal proceedings. In order to investigate perceptions of truthful and deceptive repeated-event speakers, undergraduate students observed interviews of speakers describing a single occurrence of an event that was either experienced or fabricated either once or multiple times. Some participants additionally read an expert statement on repeated-event memory. The effect of repetition on perceived credibility depended on the speaker's veracity, enhancing the credibility of fabricators but diminishing the credibility of truth-tellers. The expert testimony was found to raise the perceived honesty and cognitive competence of the repeated-event speakers and thus could be a promising mechanism for enhancing perceived credibility in legal proceedings.

摘要

对于家庭暴力和职场霸凌等重复犯罪行为,主要证据往往是所谓受害者的证词。因此,重复事件讲述者的可信度对于法律程序可能至关重要。为了调查对真实和欺骗性重复事件讲述者的看法,本科生观看了讲述者描述单次事件的访谈,这些事件要么是经历过的,要么是编造的,且编造的次数为一次或多次。一些参与者还阅读了一份关于重复事件记忆的专家声明。重复对可信度认知的影响取决于讲述者的真实性,提高了编造者的可信度,但降低了说实话者的可信度。研究发现,专家证词能提高重复事件讲述者的诚实度和认知能力,因此可能是在法律程序中提高可信度认知的一种有前景的机制。

相似文献

1
The perceived credibility of repeated-event witnesses depends upon their veracity.重复事件证人的可信度取决于他们的诚实度。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Sep 29;29(4):577-592. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1956382. eCollection 2022.
2
The effect of statement type and repetition on deception detection.陈述类型和重复对欺骗检测的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Sep 23;4(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0194-z.
3
When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case.儿童何时会被采信?性虐待案件中受害者年龄和陪审员性别对儿童可信度及裁决的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2001 Apr;25(4):523-39. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00224-1.
4
Automated verbal credibility assessment of intentions: The model statement technique and predictive modeling.意图的自动言语可信度评估:模型陈述技术与预测建模。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;32(3):354-366. doi: 10.1002/acp.3407. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection.文化取证访谈中的阿拉伯语:阿拉伯语母语的非专业人员在真相和谎言判断中的准确性、信心以及言语线索选择。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 23;19(9):e0310384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310384. eCollection 2024.
6
Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability.轻度智力残疾青少年的目击者证词及感知可信度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Oct;48(Pt 7):699-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00559.x.
7
Perceptions of institutional elder neglect in civil court.民事法庭中对机构性老年虐待的认知。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2013;25(4):305-22. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.770309.
8
Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format.陈述的感知真实性和模拟社交媒体帖子:对来源可信度、重复曝光和呈现格式的实验研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4.
9
A within-statement baseline comparison for detecting lies.用于检测谎言的语句内基线比较。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 2;28(1):94-103. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767712. eCollection 2021.
10
Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.传闻证据与儿童证言:真实陈述和虚假陈述对陪审员决策的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):363-401. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9009-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Allegations of Repeated Victimization: The Roles of Event Frequency, Language Specificity, and Disclosure Delay.对重复受害指控的认知:事件频率、语言特异性和披露延迟的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Mar;38(5-6):4925-4944. doi: 10.1177/08862605221120903. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Schema and deviation effects in remembering repeated unfamiliar stories.重复陌生故事记忆中的图式和偏差效应。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Feb;112(1):180-206. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12449. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
A meta-analysis of differences in children's reports of single and repeated events.对儿童单次和多次事件报告差异的元分析。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;43(1):99-116. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000312. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.个体决策与群体决策:陪审员在评估专家证词时对核心信息和边缘信息的依赖
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0183580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183580. eCollection 2017.
4
Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.在对嫌疑人进行认知访谈的背景下,运用现实监控来提高欺骗检测能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Aug;39(4):360-7. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000127. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error.目击证人错误的原因与解决办法研究
Front Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 13;5:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00102. eCollection 2014.
6
Perceptions and predictors of children's credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event.儿童对独特事件和重复事件实例可信度的认知及预测因素。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Feb;32(1):92-112. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9083-3. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
7
Teachers and laypersons discern quality differences between narratives produced by children with or without SLI.教师和外行人能够辨别出有或没有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童所讲述故事之间的质量差异。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Oct;49(5):1022-36. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/073).
8
Accuracy of deception judgments.欺骗判断的准确性。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):214-34. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.
9
Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.上下文信息使专家容易做出错误的识别。
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Jan 6;156(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
10
Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.仅提供辩护方和对立的目击证人专家对陪审员判断的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Oct;28(5):569-76. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000046434.39181.07.