• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜同期结直肠癌与肝切除治疗同步性结直肠癌肝转移的价值:一项倾向评分匹配研究

The Value of Laparoscopic Simultaneous Colorectal and Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

作者信息

Zhou Jiamin, Feng Longhai, Li Xinxiang, Wang Miao, Zhao Yiming, Zhang Ning, Wang Longrong, Zhang Ti, Mao Anrong, Xu Ye, Wang Lu

机构信息

Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 12;12:916455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916455. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.916455
PMID:35903708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9315101/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the value of total laparoscopic simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (sCRLMs).

METHODS

sCRLM patients who underwent simultaneous resection from December 2014 to December 2018 in Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University were recruited and analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into laparoscopic, open, and hybrid surgery groups. The intraoperative information, postoperative short-term outcome, and long-term survival were compared among the three groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baselines.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were recruited. After PSM, 34 patients were selected from both the laparoscopic and the open surgery group. Forty-seven patients were also selected from both the laparoscopic and the hybrid surgery group. The clinicopathologic baselines between the laparoscopic surgery group and the other two groups were well matched. All the operation-related indicators between laparoscopic surgery and hybrid surgery were similar. However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery showed significantly longer operation time (229.09 ± 10.94 min vs. 192.24 ± 9.49 min, = 0.013) and less intraoperative blood loss [100.00 (50.00-300.00) ml vs. 200.00 (150.00-400.00) ml, = 0.021]. For postoperative morbidity, there was no significant difference between the laparoscopic surgery group and the hybrid or the open surgery group (23.40% vs. 31.91% and 17.65% vs. 26.47%, = 0.356 and = 0.380). Long-term survival analysis showed that there were no significant differences in all 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival, liver recurrence-free survival (RFS), and whole RFS between laparoscopic surgery and hybrid surgery ( = 0.334, = 0.286, and = 0.558) or open surgery ( = 0.230, = 0.348, and = 0.450).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic simultaneous resection for sCRLM shows slight advantages in surgical safety and short-term outcome, and does not compromise long-term survival.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨全腹腔镜同期结直肠癌和肝切除在同期结直肠癌肝转移(sCRLMs)患者中的价值。

方法

回顾性纳入2014年12月至2018年12月在复旦大学附属上海肿瘤中心接受同期切除的sCRLM患者并进行分析。将患者分为腹腔镜手术组、开放手术组和杂交手术组。比较三组患者的术中情况、术后短期结局和长期生存情况。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线。

结果

共纳入281例患者。PSM后,从腹腔镜手术组和开放手术组各选取34例患者。从腹腔镜手术组和杂交手术组也各选取47例患者。腹腔镜手术组与其他两组之间的临床病理基线匹配良好。腹腔镜手术和杂交手术之间的所有手术相关指标相似。然而,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术的手术时间明显更长(229.09±10.94分钟对192.24±9.49分钟,P = 0.013),术中出血量更少[100.00(50.00 - 300.00)毫升对200.00(150.00 - 400.00)毫升,P = 0.021]。术后并发症方面,腹腔镜手术组与杂交手术组或开放手术组之间无显著差异(23.40%对31.91%以及17.65%对26.47%,P = 0.356和P = 0.380)。长期生存分析显示,腹腔镜手术与杂交手术(P = 0.334、P = 0.286和P = 0.558)或开放手术(P = 0.230、P = 0.348和P = 0.450)在1年、3年和5年总生存率、肝无复发生存率(RFS)以及全RFS方面均无显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜同期切除sCRLM在手术安全性和短期结局方面显示出轻微优势,且不影响长期生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/9315101/eeb45ad5162d/fonc-12-916455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/9315101/ea956939df59/fonc-12-916455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/9315101/eeb45ad5162d/fonc-12-916455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/9315101/ea956939df59/fonc-12-916455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/9315101/eeb45ad5162d/fonc-12-916455-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Value of Laparoscopic Simultaneous Colorectal and Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Study.腹腔镜同期结直肠癌与肝切除治疗同步性结直肠癌肝转移的价值:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 12;12:916455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916455. eCollection 2022.
2
[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases].[腹腔镜手术与开腹手术同期切除同时性结直肠癌肝转移灶的比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 1;56(7):516-521. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.07.007.
3
Totally laparoscopic strategies for the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.完全腹腔镜策略在结直肠癌合并同步肝转移中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2571-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2235-2. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open technique for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases with propensity score analysis.腹腔镜与开腹技术行结直肠癌合并肝转移同期切除术的倾向性评分分析对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4772-4780. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07253-4. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Long term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌合并同步肝转移的长期疗效比较。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic, hybrid, and open resection in colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜、杂交和开放手术治疗结直肠癌合并同步肝转移的疗效:倾向评分匹配研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12372-5.
7
[Efficacy analysis on laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases].腹腔镜同期切除原发性结直肠癌和肝转移瘤的疗效分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 25;23(6):584-588. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200412-00197.
8
Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与结直肠癌和肝转移同时切除的低发病率相关:一项更新的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep 21;18(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z.
9
Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜同期切除结直肠癌原发肿瘤和肝转移瘤:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4467-4. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
10
Impact on operative outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜同期切除结直肠癌和同步肝转移对手术结果的影响。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/ases.12802. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisocietal European consensus on the terminology, diagnosis, and management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an E-AHPBA consensus in partnership with ESSO, ESCP, ESGAR, and CIRSE.多学会欧洲共识:结直肠癌肝转移同步患者的术语、诊断和管理:E-AHPBA 与 ESSO、ESCP、ESGAR 和 CIRSE 合作的共识。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1161-1170. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad124.
2
Staged or Simultaneous Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Implications for Study Design and Clinical Endpoints.结肠癌或直肠癌伴同时性肝转移的分期手术或同期手术:对研究设计和临床终点的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;15(7):2177. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072177.

本文引用的文献

1
Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry.肝优先策略治疗结直肠同步转移瘤:来自 LiverMetSurvey 注册研究的 7360 例患者分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8198-8208. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10220-w. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与结直肠癌和肝转移同时切除的低发病率相关:一项更新的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep 21;18(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z.
3
Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A population-based cost analysis in Ontario, Canada - Health economic evaluation.
同时性与分期性切除治疗结直肠肝转移同步性病变:加拿大安大略省基于人群的成本分析-健康经济评价。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Impact on operative outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜同期切除结直肠癌和同步肝转移对手术结果的影响。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/ases.12802. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Simultaneous Versus Delayed Resection for Initially Resectable Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.同步与延迟切除对初始可切除结直肠癌肝转移的影响:一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机、对照临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):49-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003848.
6
Outcomes of Simultaneous Resections and Classical Strategy for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases in Sweden: A Nationwide Study with Special Reference to Major Liver Resections.瑞典同步结直肠肝转移的同时切除术和经典策略的结果:一项全国性研究,特别参考了主要的肝切除术。
World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2409-2417. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05475-5.
7
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.2020 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
Comparison of sequential, delayed and simultaneous resection strategies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.同期结直肠癌肝转移的序贯、延迟和同期切除策略比较
BMC Surg. 2020 Jan 17;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-0681-7.
9
Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open technique for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases with propensity score analysis.腹腔镜与开腹技术行结直肠癌合并肝转移同期切除术的倾向性评分分析对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4772-4780. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07253-4. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
10
The Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site Differs According to the KRAS Mutational Status: A Study By the International Genetic Consortium for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.原发肿瘤部位的预后影响因 KRAS 突变状态而异:国际结直肠癌肝转移遗传协作组的研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003504.