Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Sep;55(9):1202-1207. doi: 10.1002/eat.23786. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
For the first time in its history, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a recommendation on screening for eating disorders among adolescents and adults in primary care. The current manuscript provides an overview of the USPSTF recommendation, screening principles, and suggestions for clinical and research efforts.
The USPSTF based their recommendations on a rigorous systematic review of the evidence on routine screening for eating disorders. Eligible studies included studies of screening test accuracy and controlled trials of screening or interventions for eating disorders in screen-detected or previously untreated eating disorders. The current manuscript briefly summarizes the results of this evidence review which are published in full elsewhere and focuses on providing interpretation of the recommendations by clarifying the scope and methodology of the USPSTF.
Fifty-seven studies were included in the evidence review. Seventeen studies evaluated screening test accuracy and 40 trials evaluated interventions among populations with previously untreated eating disorders. No studies directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening. The evidence review highlights important gaps in our knowledge regarding eating disorders in primary care. The authors provide recommendations for future studies in light of these evidence gaps and propose specific clinical strategies to improve care for those with eating disorders who present to primary care.
Primary care can play an important role in the early detection of eating disorders, but data are needed to more fully understand the potential benefits and harms of routine screening in this setting.
There are gaps in the evidence regarding the benefits and harms of eating disorder screening in primary care. Future studies are needed to improve certainty about the net benefit of screening. Of particular importance are studies that compare routine screening to usual care (no screening). Current providers may benefit from tailored eating disorders education and training, practical tools, and integration of mental health services in primary care.
美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)有史以来首次发布了关于在初级保健中筛查青少年和成年人进食障碍的建议。目前的文稿提供了 USPSTF 建议、筛查原则的概述,以及对临床和研究工作的建议。
USPSTF 根据对进食障碍常规筛查的证据进行了严格的系统回顾,提出了这些建议。合格的研究包括筛查测试准确性的研究以及针对筛查检测或干预进食障碍的对照试验,这些试验针对的是筛查发现或未经治疗的进食障碍患者。目前的文稿简要总结了该证据综述的结果,该结果已在别处全文发表,重点在于通过澄清 USPSTF 的范围和方法来解释建议。
共有 57 项研究纳入证据综述。17 项研究评估了筛查测试的准确性,40 项试验评估了未经治疗的进食障碍人群的干预措施。没有研究直接评估筛查的获益和危害。证据综述强调了我们在初级保健中进食障碍知识方面的重要差距。作者根据这些证据差距提出了未来研究的建议,并提出了改善在初级保健中就诊的进食障碍患者护理的具体临床策略。
初级保健可以在进食障碍的早期检测中发挥重要作用,但需要更多的数据来更全面地了解在这种情况下常规筛查的潜在获益和危害。
初级保健中进食障碍筛查的获益和危害方面存在证据差距。需要进一步的研究来提高对筛查的净获益的确定性。特别重要的是将常规筛查与常规护理(不筛查)进行比较的研究。当前的提供者可能受益于针对进食障碍的专门教育和培训、实用工具以及将心理健康服务纳入初级保健。