• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自闭症谱系障碍中的视觉注意跨文化研究。

[Formula: see text] A cross-cultural study of visual attention in autism spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Northwestern University, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Evanston, IL, USA.

Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Apr;29(3):413-444. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2094904. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1080/09297049.2022.2094904
PMID:35904098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9884317/
Abstract

Differences in visual attention have been documented in ASD, and appear linked to clinical symptoms. However, most research has been conducted in Western cultures. Because striking differences in visual attention patterns have been documented in other cultures, it is important to understand how culture may influence attentional patterns in ASD. This study compared differences in visual attention in ASD across Western and East Asian cultures, where differences in attention to contextual and global information have been repeatedly demonstrated, to investigate potential culturally-specific ASD phenotypes. One hundred thirty-two total participants included individuals with ASD ( = 24) and controls ( = 47) from Hong Kong (HK), along with a previously studied group of age- and IQ-comparable participants from the United States ( = 26 ASD;  = 35 control). Gaze was tracked while participants completed two narrative tasks that differed in social-emotional complexity. Proportions of fixations to face, bodies, and setting were examined across groups using linear mixed-effect models and a series of growth curve models. Cultural differences were found across tasks and groups. Both the ASD and control HK groups attended more to global contextual setting information, more to the body regions, and less toward faces of characters compared to US groups. Growth curve models indicated that these differences attenuated over time in certain stimuli. ASD-related effects were only observed in the more complex stimuli depicting characters with ambiguous facial expressions. Findings indicate a notable cultural influence on visual attention patterns in ASD, and underscore the importance of stimuli complexity in differentiating cultural versus diagnostic effects on attentional styles.

摘要

自闭症患者的视觉注意力存在差异,且这些差异与临床症状相关。然而,大多数研究都是在西方文化中进行的。由于其他文化中已经记录到了视觉注意力模式的显著差异,因此了解文化如何影响自闭症患者的注意力模式非常重要。本研究比较了自闭症患者在西方和东亚文化中的视觉注意力差异,这些差异与对上下文和整体信息的注意力差异有关,旨在调查潜在的具有文化特异性的自闭症表型。共有 132 名参与者,包括来自香港的自闭症患者( = 24 名)和对照组( = 47 名),以及来自美国的一组年龄和智商相匹配的先前研究参与者( = 26 名自闭症患者; = 35 名对照组)。参与者在完成两个具有不同社会情感复杂性的叙事任务时,追踪了他们的目光。使用线性混合效应模型和一系列增长曲线模型,在不同的组中检查了注视面孔、身体和背景的比例。在任务和组之间发现了文化差异。与美国组相比,自闭症和对照组的香港参与者更多地关注全局背景信息、身体区域,以及较少地关注角色的面部。增长曲线模型表明,在某些刺激下,这些差异随时间而减弱。仅在描绘具有模糊面部表情的角色的更复杂刺激中观察到与自闭症相关的影响。研究结果表明,自闭症患者的视觉注意力模式存在显著的文化影响,强调了刺激复杂性在区分注意力模式的文化与诊断效应方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
[Formula: see text] A cross-cultural study of visual attention in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的视觉注意跨文化研究。
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Apr;29(3):413-444. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2094904. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
A cross-cultural study showing deficits in gaze-language coordination during rapid automatized naming among individuals with ASD.一项跨文化研究表明,自闭症个体在快速眼动命名任务中存在眼神-语言协调缺陷。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91911-y.
3
A constellation of eye-tracking measures reveals social attention differences in ASD and the broad autism phenotype.一系列的眼动追踪测量结果揭示了 ASD 和广泛自闭症表型中的社会注意力差异。
Mol Autism. 2022 May 4;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00490-w.
4
[Slowing down the flow of facial information enhances facial scanning in children with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot eye tracking study].[减缓面部信息流动增强自闭症谱系障碍儿童的面部扫描:一项初步眼动追踪研究]
Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Social attention to activities in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder: effects of context and age.社交对自闭症谱系障碍儿童和成人活动的关注:情境和年龄的影响。
Mol Autism. 2020 Oct 19;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00388-5.
6
Visual preference for social vs. non-social images in young children with autism spectrum disorders. An eye tracking study.自闭症谱系障碍儿童对社会与非社会图像的视觉偏好。一项眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252795. eCollection 2021.
7
Autism and emotional face-viewing.自闭症与情绪面孔观察
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):901-910. doi: 10.1002/aur.1730. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
8
Understanding Social Communication Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder and First-Degree Relatives: A Study of Looking and Speaking.理解自闭症谱系障碍及其一级亲属的社会沟通差异:一项关于注视和说话的研究。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):2128-2141. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03969-3.
9
Investigating automatic emotion processing in boys with autism via eye tracking and facial mimicry recordings.通过眼动追踪和面部模仿记录研究自闭症男孩的自动情绪处理。
Autism Res. 2021 Jul;14(7):1404-1420. doi: 10.1002/aur.2490. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Atypical gaze patterns to facial feature areas in autism spectrum disorders reveal age and culture effects: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies.自闭症谱系障碍患者对面部特征区域的非典型注视模式揭示了年龄和文化的影响:眼动追踪研究的荟萃分析。
Autism Res. 2021 Dec;14(12):2625-2639. doi: 10.1002/aur.2607. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing timely diagnosis of autism in China: an application of Andersen's behavioral model of health services use.影响中国自闭症及时诊断的因素:安德森卫生服务利用行为模型的应用
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06590-0.
2
Predictive Processing Among Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder During Online Language Comprehension: A Preliminary Systematic Review.自闭症谱系障碍个体在线语言理解过程中的预测性加工:一项初步系统综述
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06704-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Social Communication Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder and First-Degree Relatives: A Study of Looking and Speaking.理解自闭症谱系障碍及其一级亲属的社会沟通差异:一项关于注视和说话的研究。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):2128-2141. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03969-3.
2
Links between looking and speaking in autism and first-degree relatives: insights into the expression of genetic liability to autism.自闭症患者及其一级亲属的视与言之间的关联:对自闭症遗传易感性表达的深入了解。
Mol Autism. 2018 Oct 10;9:51. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0233-5. eCollection 2018.
3
Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and is atypical in autism.婴儿对社交场景的观看受基因控制,在自闭症中表现异常。
Nature. 2017 Jul 20;547(7663):340-344. doi: 10.1038/nature22999. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
A Meta-Analysis of Gaze Differences to Social and Nonsocial Information Between Individuals With and Without Autism.自闭症患者与非自闭症患者对社会和非社会信息的注视差异的荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;56(7):546-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
How different cultures look at faces depends on the interpersonal context.不同文化如何看待面部表情取决于人际环境。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):258-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000119. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Global and local visual processing in autism: An objective assessment approach.自闭症中的全局和局部视觉处理:一种客观评估方法。
Autism Res. 2017 Aug;10(8):1392-1404. doi: 10.1002/aur.1782. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
7
What's the story? A computational analysis of narrative competence in autism.有何故事?自闭症叙事能力的计算分析。
Autism. 2018 Apr;22(3):335-344. doi: 10.1177/1362361316677957. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?超越目光注视:眼动追踪还能揭示关于认知和认知发展的哪些方面?
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:69-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Pupillometry reveals changes in physiological arousal during a sustained listening task.瞳孔测量法揭示了在持续听力任务期间生理唤醒的变化。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Feb;54(2):193-203. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12772. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
10
Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability.智障青少年能力测量的比较
Front Psychol. 2016 May 17;7:683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00683. eCollection 2016.