• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National Brazilian survey on the outcomes of hepatitis c retreatment in patients non-responders to direct antiviral agents.巴西全国性调查:直接抗病毒药物治疗无应答的丙型肝炎患者的治疗结局。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):102388. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102388. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
Real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype-2 infection after completed treatment.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗完成后慢性丙型肝炎基因型 2 感染患者的真实世界疗效。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021 Apr;37(4):334-345. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12315. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Baseline resistance associated substitutions in HCV genotype 1 infected cohort treated with Simeprevir, Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir in Brazil.巴西接受simeprevir、达卡他韦和索非布韦治疗的 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者的基线耐药相关替换。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;44(3):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Real-world effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir in hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3.达卡他韦联合索非布韦和维帕他韦/索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎 2 型和 3 型的真实世界疗效。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
A randomized-controlled trial of SOF/VEL/VOX with or without ribavirin for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C.SOF/VEL/VOX 联合或不联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的随机对照试验。
J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.011. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
6
Retreatment Efficacy of Sofosbuvir/Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 Patients.索磷布韦/奥贝他韦/达卡他韦/利托那韦+利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎病毒 4 型患者的疗效。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1341-1347. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5005-8. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Satisfactory virological response and fibrosis improvement of sofosbuvir-based regimens for Chinese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: results of a real-world cohort study.索磷布韦为基础的方案治疗中国丙型肝炎病毒 3 型感染患者的满意病毒学应答和纤维化改善:一项真实世界队列研究的结果。
Virol J. 2018 Oct 1;15(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1066-8.
8
Real world SOF/VEL/VOX retreatment outcomes and viral resistance analysis for HCV patients with prior failure to DAA therapy.真实世界中,对于曾对直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗失败的 HCV 患者,SOF/VEL/VOX 再治疗的结局和病毒耐药性分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Sep;28(9):1256-1264. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13549. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Direct antiviral therapy for treatment of hepatitis C: A real-world study from Brazil.直接抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎:巴西的真实世界研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;18(6):849-854. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Retreatment with sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and add-on ribavirin for patients who failed daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy.达拉他韦和asunaprevir 联合治疗失败的患者,应用索磷布韦、来迪派韦和利巴韦林进行再治疗。
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1122-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1328-z. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Outcomes of Direct-Acting Antiviral Experienced Patients with Hepatitis C Undergoing Retreatment at an Essential Hospital in the United States.美国一家基层医院中接受再治疗的曾使用直接抗病毒药物的丙型肝炎患者的特征与治疗结果
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 27;11(12):ofae704. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae704. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Experience with direct-acting antivirals in genotype 1-5 infected chronic hepatitis C patients in Turkey.土耳其基因 1-5 型感染慢性丙型肝炎患者使用直接作用抗病毒药物的经验。
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;43(5):308-314. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.308. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Retrieval of HCV patients lost to follow-up as a strategy for Hepatitis C Microelimination: results of a Brazilian multicentre study.作为丙型肝炎微消除策略的失访 HCV 患者检索:巴西多中心研究的结果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08169-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Corrigendum to 'EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series [J Hepatol 73 (2020) 1170-1218].《欧洲肝脏研究学会丙型肝炎治疗推荐:系列最终更新版》勘误 [《肝脏病学杂志》73卷(2020年)1170 - 1218页]
J Hepatol. 2023 Feb;78(2):452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Global change in hepatitis C virus prevalence and cascade of care between 2015 and 2020: a modelling study.全球丙型肝炎病毒流行率的变化和 2015 年至 2020 年期间的治疗流程:建模研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;7(5):396-415. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00472-6. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
An update on direct antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C.丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物治疗的最新进展。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;22(13):1729-1741. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1921737. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir + sofosbuvir + ribavirin offers high cure rate for hepatitis C virus retreatment in real-world settings.格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦+索磷布韦+利巴韦林在真实世界环境中为丙型肝炎病毒再治疗提供了高治愈率。
J Hepatol. 2021 Jul;75(1):251-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients who failed previous therapy with directly acting antivirals: A multicenter study.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗失败的慢性丙型肝炎患者的再治疗:一项多中心研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:367-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Therapy in Genotype 2 Chronic Hepatitis C Patients in South Korea, with Emphasis on the Ribavirin Dose.韩国 2 型慢性丙型肝炎患者基于索磷布韦的治疗的真实有效性和安全性,重点关注利巴韦林剂量。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):775-782. doi: 10.5009/gnl19260.
7
Simple predictors of nonresponse to direct-acting antivirals in chronic hepatitis C patients.慢性丙型肝炎患者对直接抗病毒药物无应答的简单预测指标
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;32(8):1017-1022. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001612.
8
Direct antiviral therapy for treatment of hepatitis C: A real-world study from Brazil.直接抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎:巴西的真实世界研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;18(6):849-854. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
9
Hepatitis C disease burden and strategies for elimination by 2030 in Brazil. A mathematical modeling approach.巴西丙型肝炎疾病负担及 2030 年消除策略。一种数学建模方法。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Retreatment of Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients with Direct-Acting Antiviral Failures.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗失败的丙型肝炎病毒感染者的再治疗。
Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;39(3):354-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687823. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

巴西全国性调查:直接抗病毒药物治疗无应答的丙型肝炎患者的治疗结局。

National Brazilian survey on the outcomes of hepatitis c retreatment in patients non-responders to direct antiviral agents.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Serviço Municipal de Infectologia de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Infect Dis. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):102388. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102388. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102388
PMID:
35905930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9459029/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment of hepatitis C with direct antiviral agents (DAA) is associated with almost 95% of sustained virological response. However, some patients need retreatment. In Brazil, it should be done according to the Ministry of Health guidelines, frequently updated to include newly available drugs. This study aimed to conduct a national survey about the characteristics and outcomes of retreatment of hepatitis C in previously non-responders to DAAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Institutions from all over the country were invited to participate in a national registry for retreatment, including information about clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the patients, type and outcomes of retreatment regimens. Only patients previously treated with interferon-free regimens were included.

RESULTS

As previous treatments the distribution was: SOF/DCV (56%), SOF/SIM (22%), 3D (11%), SOF/LED (6%) and SOF/RBV (5%). For retreatment the most frequently used drugs were SOF/GP (46%), SOF/DCV (23%) and SOF/VEL (11%). From 159 patients retreated, 132/159 (83%) had complete information in the registry and among them only seven patients were non-responders (SVR of 94.6%). All retreatments were well tolerated, without any serious adverse events or interruptions.

CONCLUSION

The retreatment of patients previously non-responders to DAAs was associated with high rate of SVR in this sample of Brazilian patients. This finding allows us to conclude that the retreatment options available in the public health system in Brazil are effective and safe and are an important component of the strategy of elimination of hepatitis C in our country.

摘要

背景与目的

直接抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗丙型肝炎的持续病毒学应答率接近 95%。然而,一些患者需要再次治疗。在巴西,应根据卫生部的指南进行治疗,该指南经常更新,以纳入新的可用药物。本研究旨在对先前对 DAA 无应答的丙型肝炎患者进行再次治疗的特征和结果进行全国性调查。

患者与方法

邀请全国各地的机构参与国家再治疗登记处,包括患者临床和流行病学特征、再治疗方案类型和结果的信息。仅包括先前接受无干扰素方案治疗的患者。

结果

之前的治疗分布为:SOF/DCV(56%)、SOF/SIM(22%)、3D(11%)、SOF/LED(6%)和 SOF/RBV(5%)。对于再治疗,最常使用的药物是 SOF/GP(46%)、SOF/DCV(23%)和 SOF/VEL(11%)。在 159 名接受再治疗的患者中,132/159(83%)在登记处有完整的信息,其中只有 7 名患者无应答(SVR 为 94.6%)。所有再治疗均耐受良好,无严重不良事件或中断。

结论

在巴西,先前对 DAA 无应答的患者再次治疗与高 SVR 率相关。这一发现使我们能够得出结论,巴西公共卫生系统提供的再治疗方案是有效且安全的,是消除我国丙型肝炎战略的重要组成部分。