Suppr超能文献

通过无创评估心室电不均一性来优化左束支区域起搏。

Non-invasive assessment of ventricular electrical heterogeneity to optimize left bundle branch area pacing.

作者信息

Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi, Hughes Grace, Manganiello Marilee, Johns Alicia, Ghosh Subham

机构信息

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Geisinger Heart Institute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, MC 36-10, 1000 E Mountain Blvd, Wilkes Barre, PA, 18711, USA.

Clinical Trials Unit, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1103-1112. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01315-9. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel therapeutic option for bradycardia and heart failure patients. ECG belt is a novel technology for assessment of ventricular electrical heterogeneity (VEH) using multi-electrode ECG. A metric of overall VEH based on standard deviation of activation times (SDAT) from all electrodes in the ECG belt has been previously shown to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. The aim of the study is to evaluate non-invasive assessment of VEH using ECG belt to optimize LBBAP.

METHODS

VEH from a 40-electrode ECG belt was characterized in 20 patients (male 15, EF 33 ± 13%, NYHA class 3.05 ± 0.6; CRT indication 18) during LBBAP (20) and LBBAP-Optimized CRT (LOT-CRT-7), anodal capture (16), NS-LBBP (18), S-LBBP (5), LVSP (9). In addition to SDAT, regional (LV/RV) VEH was assessed with average left ventricular activation times (LVAT), SDAT of left-sided (LV dispersion) and right-sided (RV dispersion) electrodes. Optimal LBBAP was determined based on maximal SDAT and QRS duration (d) change.

RESULTS

All metrics were significantly reduced (p < 0.0001 for ECG belt metrics, p = 0.0027 for QRSd) during LBBAP and LOT-CRT compared to intrinsic. QRSd, SDAT, LVAT, and LV and RV dispersion during optimal LBBAP were significantly lower (133 ± 20/157 ± 24; 20.5 ± 7.5/38.6 ± 9; 44.4 ± 14.3/61.4 ± 21; 11.6 ± 11.6/29.5 ± 15; 21.1 ± 7.8/42.5 ± 9.3; p < 0.0001) compared to intrinsic rhythm. However, they were not significantly different among selective, non-selective, anodal, and LV septal captures. EF and NYHA class improved to 46 ± 11% and 1.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP significantly reduced overall and regional (RV/LV) VEH, irrespective of the mechanism of capture. Detailed assessment of electrical heterogeneity using ECG belt may add valuable insights on effects of LBBAP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04583709.

摘要

背景

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是治疗心动过缓和心力衰竭患者的一种新的治疗选择。心电图带是一种使用多电极心电图评估心室电不均一性(VEH)的新技术。先前已证明基于心电图带中所有电极激活时间标准差(SDAT)的整体VEH指标可预测心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应。本研究的目的是评估使用心电图带对VEH进行无创评估以优化LBBAP。

方法

在LBBAP(20例)、优化LBBAP的CRT(LOT-CRT-7,18例)、阳极夺获(16例)、非选择性左束支起搏(NS-LBBP,18例)、选择性左束支起搏(S-LBBP,5例)、左心室刺激起搏(LVSP,9例)过程中,对20例患者(男性15例,射血分数33±13%,纽约心脏协会心功能分级3.05±0.6;18例有CRT指征)进行40电极心电图带VEH特征分析。除SDAT外,还通过平均左心室激活时间(LVAT)、左侧(左心室离散度)和右侧(右心室离散度)电极的SDAT评估区域(左心室/右心室)VEH。根据最大SDAT和QRS波时限(d)变化确定最佳LBBAP。

结果

与自身心律相比,在LBBAP和LOT-CRT期间,所有指标均显著降低(心电图带指标p<0.0001,QRSd p=0.0027)。最佳LBBAP期间的QRSd、SDAT、LVAT以及左心室和右心室离散度显著低于自身心律(133±20/157±24;20.5±7.5/38.6±9;44.4±14.3/61.4±21;11.6±11.6/29.5±15;21.1±7.8/42.5±9.3;p<0.0001)。然而,在选择性、非选择性、阳极和左心室间隔夺获之间,这些指标无显著差异。射血分数和纽约心脏协会心功能分级改善至46±11%和1.9±0.6(p<0.001)。

结论

无论夺获机制如何,LBBAP均显著降低整体和区域(右心室/左心室)VEH。使用心电图带对电不均一性进行详细评估可能为LBBAP的效果提供有价值的数据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04583709。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验