• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)Ⅰ、Ⅱ期的临床疗效及安全性。

Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.

机构信息

School of Medical and Life Sciences,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 37 Twelfth Bridge Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.

Chengdu Hospital for Reproduction, Women and Children, Chengdu University of Chinese Medicine, Sichuan, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z
PMID:35907811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338633/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) for two types patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-I and CSP-II).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 CSP-I patients and 52 CSP-II patients who received HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C from Jun 2014 to Oct 2020. The diameter of gestational sac/mass, thickness of the intervening myometrium, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stays, adverse effects and β-HCG level in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

All patients successfully received HIFU ablation under conscious sedation. The median total treatment time of HIFU ablation and median USg-D&C time in the CSP-I group were statistically longer than those in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The average intraoperative median blood loss was 39 ml in the CSP-I group and 65 ml in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization was 7.07 ± 1.83 days in the CSP-I group and 7.18 ± 1.72 days in the CSP-II group (P > 0.05). The average time needed for β-HCG return to normal levels was 26.08 ± 5.02. and 28.15 ± 4.99 days for CSP-I and CSP-II, respectively (P > 0.05). The percentage of adverse effects and complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C was safe and effective in treating the CSP-I patients and CSP-II patients, which may be a potential noninvasive therapeutic option for patients with CSP.

摘要

目的

探讨高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融联合超声引导清宫术(USg-D&C)治疗两种类型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP-I 和 CSP-II)患者的安全性和可行性。

材料与方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2014 年 6 月至 2020 年 10 月期间 101 例 CSP-I 患者和 52 例 CSP-II 患者,均接受 HIFU 消融联合 USg-D&C 治疗。比较两组患者的妊娠囊/肿块直径、间隔肌厚度、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、不良反应及β-HCG 水平。

结果

所有患者均在清醒镇静下成功接受 HIFU 消融。CSP-I 组 HIFU 消融和 USg-D&C 的中位总治疗时间明显长于 CSP-II 组(P < 0.05)。CSP-I 组术中平均中位出血量为 39ml,CSP-II 组为 65ml(P < 0.05)。CSP-I 组的住院时间为 7.07 ± 1.83 天,CSP-II 组为 7.18 ± 1.72 天(P > 0.05)。两组患者β-HCG 恢复正常水平的平均时间分别为 26.08 ± 5.02 天和 28.15 ± 4.99 天(P > 0.05)。两组不良反应和并发症发生率无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

HIFU 消融联合 USg-D&C 治疗 CSP-I 患者和 CSP-II 患者安全有效,可能是 CSP 患者一种有潜力的非侵入性治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/68b20dbe161a/12884_2022_4848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/2fe82c020a93/12884_2022_4848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/2408b409e899/12884_2022_4848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/68b20dbe161a/12884_2022_4848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/2fe82c020a93/12884_2022_4848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/2408b409e899/12884_2022_4848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cceb/9338633/68b20dbe161a/12884_2022_4848_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)Ⅰ、Ⅱ期的临床疗效及安全性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z.
2
High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies.高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:不同 HIFU 超声策略的比较。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):390-396. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044078.
3
Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage.高强度聚焦超声治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠后行超声引导下清宫术治疗对再次妊娠结局的影响。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):926-931. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1654619.
4
Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(30):e7687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007687.
5
Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.超声引导下清宫术前高强度聚焦超声或子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及再次妊娠结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0.
6
High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.高强度聚焦超声联合刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e854. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000854.
7
Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment.分析剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的类型对高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导抽吸刮宫治疗效果及安全性的影响。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):1449-1457. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2107715.
8
Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产术后妊娠的疗效及安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jun;30(6):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy.高强度聚焦超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术前处理中的临床结局。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;59(3):387-391. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.03.009.
10
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.高强度聚焦超声联合子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的生殖结局分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing intraoperative hemorrhage in type II caesarean scar pregnancy: a study protocol comparing high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) pretreatment vs. hysteroscopy-guided suction curettage-an open-label, 1:1 parallel-group, superiority-design investigator-initiated trial (IIT).减少Ⅱ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中出血:一项比较高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)预处理与宫腔镜引导下吸刮术的研究方案——一项开放标签、1:1平行组、优效性设计的研究者发起试验(IIT)。
Trials. 2025 Aug 6;26(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08967-8.
2
Comparison of the perioperative complications of high intensity focused ultrasound vs. laparoscopic surgery for uterine fibroids: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声与腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤围手术期并发症的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 17;12:1568000. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1568000. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的治疗方法及术中出血的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:682368. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682368. eCollection 2021.
2
Subsequent Fertility in Women Treated for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy With Hysteroscopy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Hospital.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠宫腔镜治疗后女性的后续生育能力:一家三级医院的 5 年随访描述性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 10;12:659647. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.659647. eCollection 2021.
3
Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的治疗进展:技术、临床结局和生育力保存的综合评价。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 3;30:e943550. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943550.
4
Healing Process after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Benign Skin Lesions: Dermoscopic Analysis and Treatment Guidelines.高强度聚焦超声治疗良性皮肤病变后的愈合过程:皮肤镜分析与治疗指南
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 6;13(4):931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040931.
5
Clinical Application of a New Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Classification and Evaluation System and a Risk Scoring System.一种新型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠分类评估系统及风险评分系统的临床应用
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 16;17:115-126. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S445327. eCollection 2024.
6
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Current Understanding and Treatment Including Role of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:当前的认识与治疗,包括微创外科技术的作用
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Apr 19;12(2):64-71. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_116_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
7
"In Situ" Methotrexate Injection Followed by Hysteroscopic Resection for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience.原位甲氨蝶呤注射后行宫腔镜切除治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2304. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062304.
Clinical outcome and analysis of procedural failure during uterine artery chemoembolisation as a treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy.
子宫动脉化疗栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床结局及手术失败分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):243-248. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.100713. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
Managing Ectopic Pregnancies by Targeting Chorionic Villi with a Transvaginal Injection of Ethanol into the Lacunar Space.通过经阴道向绒毛间隙注射乙醇靶向绒毛膜绒毛来处理异位妊娠。
Biomedicines. 2020 Jul 9;8(7):202. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8070202.
5
Risk Factor for Residue After Uterine Artery Chemotherapy and Embolization in Combination with Dilatation and Curettage for Treating Caesarean Scar Pregnancy.子宫动脉化疗栓塞联合清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术后残留的危险因素。
Curr Mol Med. 2019;19(7):525-531. doi: 10.2174/1566524019666190612135728.
6
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效与安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1314-1325. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00959-w. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Treatment of caesarean section scar pregnancy with systemic administration of methotrexate.甲氨蝶呤全身给药治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep;31(5(Special)):2287-2290.
8
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.高强度聚焦超声联合子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的生殖结局分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Dilation and Curettage for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Efficacy and Future Fertility.子宫动脉栓塞联合刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:疗效及对未来生育能力的影响
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Aug;41(8):1165-1173. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1934-z. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for abdominal wall endometriosis: a retrospective study.超声引导高强度聚焦超声治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症:一项回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124 Suppl 3:59-63. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14741.