• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对非牙科专业人员在长期护理机构中评估老年人口腔健康的测量工具的系统评价。

A systematic review of measurement instruments for oral health assessment of older adults in long-term care facilities by nondental professionals.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

Gerodontology. 2023 Jun;40(2):148-160. doi: 10.1111/ger.12648. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/ger.12648
PMID:35908227
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regular oral health assessment of older adults living in Long-term Care Facilities (LTCF) can improve their oral health.

AIMS

This study aimed to systematically review studies describing the development of instruments employed by nondental professionals to assess the oral health of older adults in LTCF and to evaluate their measurement properties.

MATERIAL & METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS databases. Measurement properties of the identified instruments were evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards to select health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Studies assessing at least one measurement property (validity, reliability, or responsiveness) of instruments used to assess oral health of older adults living in LTCF by nondental professionals were considered. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reporting measurement properties of seven instruments were selected. The ohr-interRAI and the OHAT were considered to have sufficient content validity, with high and moderate evidence quality, respectively. OHAT, BOHSE, and DHI showed acceptable results on reliability but with very low quality of evidence. DHI and OHSTNP also showed acceptable results for criterion validity, but, with low quality of evidence, insufficient or unclear results were observed for the remaining measurement properties. Studies evaluating the validity criteria of BOHSE and hypotheses testing of ohr-MDS were considered to have high evidence quality.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The ohr-interRAI can be provisionally recommended for use until further evidence is provided. Further methodologically rigorous studies are needed to assess the measurement properties of the existing instruments.

摘要

背景

定期对长期护理机构(LTCF)中的老年人进行口腔健康评估可以改善他们的口腔健康。

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾描述非牙科专业人员用于评估 LTCF 中老年人口腔健康的工具的发展,并评估其测量特性。

材料与方法

在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 LILACS 数据库中进行电子检索。使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)检查表评估确定工具的测量特性。评估了评估非牙科专业人员用于评估居住在 LTCF 中的老年人口腔健康的仪器的至少一项测量特性(有效性、可靠性或反应性)的研究。使用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)检查表评估证据质量。

结果

选择了 15 项报告了 7 种仪器测量特性的研究。ohr-interRAI 和 OHAT 被认为具有足够的内容有效性,具有较高和中等的证据质量。OHAT、BOHSE 和 DHI 在可靠性方面表现出可接受的结果,但证据质量非常低。DHI 和 OHSTNP 也在标准有效性方面表现出可接受的结果,但对于其余的测量特性,观察到证据质量低、不足或不明确的结果。评估 BOHSE 的有效性标准和 ohr-MDS 的假设检验的研究被认为具有高证据质量。

讨论与结论

可以暂时推荐使用 ohr-interRAI,直到提供更多证据。需要进一步进行方法学严谨的研究来评估现有工具的测量特性。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of measurement instruments for oral health assessment of older adults in long-term care facilities by nondental professionals.对非牙科专业人员在长期护理机构中评估老年人口腔健康的测量工具的系统评价。
Gerodontology. 2023 Jun;40(2):148-160. doi: 10.1111/ger.12648. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review.评估慢性伤口的工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103998. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
4
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
5
Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review.评估脊髓损伤个体手动轮椅移动性的临床仪器的测量属性:系统评价
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr;104(4):656-672. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
6
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
7
Instruments used to measure dating violence: A systematic review of psychometric properties.用于测量约会暴力的工具:心理测量特性的系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1267-1289. doi: 10.1111/jan.15374. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.评估新生儿疼痛的临床评定量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 14;4(4):MR000064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000064.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of the OHS-interRAI for regular oral health assessments by non-dental caregivers: focus group study using a SWOT analysis.非牙科护理人员使用OHS-interRAI进行定期口腔健康评估的实施:采用SWOT分析的焦点小组研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22938-3.
2
Comparison of the oral health status of nursing home residents using the current and the newly developed interRAI oral health section (OHS-interRAI): a cross-sectional study.利用现行和新开发的 interRAI 口腔健康部分(OHS-interRAI)比较养老院居民的口腔健康状况:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05494-0.
3
Oral Health Problems Among Flemish and Dutch Nursing Home Residents Assessed by Nondental Caregivers Using the Novel Oral Health Section for Inclusion in interRAI.
由非牙科护理人员使用纳入 interRAI 的新型口腔健康部分对佛兰芒和荷兰养老院居民的口腔健康问题进行评估。
Innov Aging. 2024 Sep 20;8(10):igae090. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae090. eCollection 2024.
4
Modified Oral Health Assessment Tool (M-OHAT) for Residential Aged Care: A Co-Design Protocol.适用于老年护理院的改良口腔健康评估工具(M-OHAT):一项协同设计方案。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;12(19):1953. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191953.
5
A prospective cohort study on factors related to dental care and continuation of care for older adults receiving home medical care.一项关于接受家庭医疗护理的老年人的牙科护理及护理延续相关因素的前瞻性队列研究。
Odontology. 2025 Apr;113(2):776-787. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00984-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Oral health assessment in institutionalized elderly: a scoping review.机构化老年人的口腔健康评估:范围综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 24;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04025-y.
7
Oral Health Assessment Tools for Elderly Adults: A Scoping Review.老年人口腔健康评估工具:一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 22;16:4181-4192. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S442439. eCollection 2023.