• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马德里34家医院不良事件的发生率、特征及影响。ESHAMD研究。

Prevalence, characteristics, and impact of Adverse Events in 34 Madrid hospitals. The ESHMAD study.

作者信息

Valencia-Martín J L, Vicente-Guijarro J, San Jose-Saras D, Moreno-Nunez P, Pardo-Hernández A, Aranaz-Andrés J M

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Jul 31;52(12):e13851. doi: 10.1111/eci.13851.

DOI:10.1111/eci.13851
PMID:35909351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9787492/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adverse Events (AE) are one of the main problems in healthcare. Therefore, many policies have been developed worldwide to mitigate their impact. The Patient Safety Incident Study in Hospitals in the Community of Madrid (ESHMAD) measures the results of them in the region.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study, conducted in May 2019, in hospitalised patients in 34 public hospitals using the Harvard Medical Practice Study methodology. A logistic regression model was carried out to study the association of the variables with the presence of AE, calibrated and adjusted by patient.

RESULTS

A total of 9,975 patients were included, estimating a prevalence of AE of 11.9%. A higher risk of AE was observed in patients with surgical procedures (OR[CI95%]: 2.15[1.79 to 2.57], vs. absence), in Intensive Care Units (OR[CI95%]: 1.60[1.17 to 2.17], vs. Medical), and in hospitals of medium complexity (OR[CI95%]: 1.45[1.12 to 1.87], vs. low complexity). A 62.6% of AE increased the length of the stay or it was the cause of admission, and 46.9% of AE were considered preventable. In 11.5% of patients with AE, they had contributed to their death.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of AE remains similar to the previously estimated in studies developed with the same methodology. AE keep leading to longer hospital stays, contributing to patient's death, showing that it is necessary to put focus on patient safety again. A detailed analysis of these events has enabled the detection of specific areas for improvement according to the type of care, centre, and patient.

摘要

引言

不良事件(AE)是医疗保健中的主要问题之一。因此,全球已制定了许多政策来减轻其影响。马德里社区医院患者安全事件研究(ESHMAD)衡量了该地区这些政策的效果。

方法

2019年5月进行的横断面研究,采用哈佛医疗实践研究方法,对34家公立医院的住院患者进行研究。进行逻辑回归模型以研究变量与不良事件发生之间的关联,并按患者进行校准和调整。

结果

共纳入9975例患者,估计不良事件患病率为11.9%。手术患者(比值比[95%置信区间]:2.15[1.79至2.57],与无手术相比)、重症监护病房患者(比值比[95%置信区间]:1.60[1.17至2.17],与内科相比)以及中等复杂程度医院的患者(比值比[95%置信区间]:1.45[1.12至1.87],与低复杂程度医院相比)发生不良事件的风险更高。62.6%的不良事件增加了住院时间或导致入院,46.9%的不良事件被认为是可预防的。在11.5%发生不良事件的患者中,不良事件导致了他们的死亡。

结论

不良事件的患病率与之前采用相同方法进行的研究所估计的患病率相似。不良事件继续导致住院时间延长,致使患者死亡,这表明有必要再次关注患者安全。对这些事件的详细分析有助于根据护理类型、中心和患者情况确定具体的改进领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/9787492/9e284b07e904/ECI-52-e13851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/9787492/9e284b07e904/ECI-52-e13851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/9787492/9e284b07e904/ECI-52-e13851-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence, characteristics, and impact of Adverse Events in 34 Madrid hospitals. The ESHMAD study.马德里34家医院不良事件的发生率、特征及影响。ESHAMD研究。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Jul 31;52(12):e13851. doi: 10.1111/eci.13851.
2
Adverse events: an expensive and avoidable hospital problem.不良事件:代价高昂且可避免的医院问题。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):3157-3168. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2140450.
3
The Study on Safety in Hospitals in the Region of Madrid (ESHMAD) design: Screening and analysis of incidents and adverse events.马德里地区医院安全研究(ESHMAD)设计:事件和不良事件的筛查与分析。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Adverse events related to hospital care: a retrospective medical records review in a Swiss hospital.与医院护理相关的不良事件:瑞士一家医院的回顾性病历审查
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):527-533. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx061.
5
Surgery Is in Itself a Risk Factor for the Patient.手术本身就是患者的一个风险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084761.
6
The application of Iberoamerican study of adverse events (IBEAS) methodology in Brazilian hospitals.伊比利亚美洲不良事件研究(IBEAS)方法在巴西医院的应用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Jul 1;30(6):480-485. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy055.
7
[Adverse events in general and digestive surgery departments in Spanish hospitals].[西班牙医院普通外科和消化外科的不良事件]
Cir Esp. 2007 Nov;82(5):268-77. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(07)71724-4.
8
[Adverse events associated with the healthcare of patients with multimorbidity admitted to medium-long stay hospitals].[与入住中长期住院医院的多病共存患者医疗保健相关的不良事件]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jul;135 Suppl 1:17-23. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(10)70016-6.
9
[Utility of the ENEAS study screening guide in a long-stay chronic care hospital].[ENEAS研究筛查指南在长期慢性护理医院中的效用]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jul;135 Suppl 1:24-30. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(10)70017-8.
10
Inappropriate hospital admission as a risk factor for the subsequent development of adverse events: a cross-sectional study.不适当的住院作为随后发生不良事件的风险因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 17;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03024-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the occurrence of adverse events through the global trigger tool in a university hospital in Italy.通过全球触发工具对意大利一家大学医院不良事件的发生情况进行评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 4;15(1):23973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08617-8.
2
H-SVEST: Validation and Adaptation of the Hebrew Version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool.H-SVEST:第二次受害者经历与支持工具希伯来语版本的验证与改编
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 9;14(4):3919-3932. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040286.
3
Bi-lingual content validation of the Non-Technical Skills for Operating Room Nurses (NOTSORN) tool: A Delphi study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Study on Safety in Hospitals in the Region of Madrid (ESHMAD) design: Screening and analysis of incidents and adverse events.马德里地区医院安全研究(ESHMAD)设计:事件和不良事件的筛查与分析。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Comparing Rates of Adverse Events and Medical Errors on Inpatient Psychiatric Units at Veterans Health Administration and Community-based General Hospitals.比较退伍军人事务部和社区综合医院住院精神病病房不良事件和医疗差错的发生率。
Med Care. 2019 Nov;57(11):913-920. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001215.
3
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.
手术室护士非技术技能(NOTSORN)工具的双语内容验证:一项德尔菲研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jun 20;7:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100218. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Inappropriate hospital admission as a risk factor for the subsequent development of adverse events: a cross-sectional study.不适当的住院作为随后发生不良事件的风险因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 17;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03024-0.
5
Nurses' Silence: Understanding the Impacts of Second Victim Phenomenon among Israeli Nurses.护士的沉默:理解以色列护士中“二次受害者现象”的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 7;11(13):1961. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131961.
6
Inappropriate Hospital Admission According to Patient Intrinsic Risk Factors: an Epidemiological Approach.根据患者内在风险因素判断不适当的医院收治:一种流行病学方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1655-1663. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07998-0. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
7
Adverse events: an expensive and avoidable hospital problem.不良事件:代价高昂且可避免的医院问题。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):3157-3168. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2140450.
医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
4
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
Defining Patient Safety Events in Inpatient Psychiatry.界定住院精神科患者安全事件
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1452-e1457. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000520.
6
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.
7
The application of Iberoamerican study of adverse events (IBEAS) methodology in Brazilian hospitals.伊比利亚美洲不良事件研究(IBEAS)方法在巴西医院的应用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Jul 1;30(6):480-485. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy055.
8
Patient and hospital characteristics that influence incidence of adverse events in acute public hospitals in Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.影响葡萄牙急性公立医院不良事件发生率的患者和医院特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Mar 1;30(2):132-137. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx190.
9
Safety of Psychiatric Inpatients at the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人事务部精神病住院患者的安全性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Feb 1;69(2):204-210. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700224. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design.IBEAS研究(伊比利亚美洲不良事件研究)中两种评估不良事件方法的比较:横断面研究与回顾性队列设计。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 8;7(10):e016546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546.