Suppr超能文献

卡塔尔一家三级医院收治患者的青霉素过敏标注:一项回顾性审计。

Labeling of penicillin allergy in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Qatar: A retrospective audit.

作者信息

Hasan Elajez Reem, Bakdach Dana, Al-Adawi Rana, Elgaily Dina, Karawia Ahmed, Mohamed Asmaa

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar E-mail:

Pharmacy Department, Rumailah Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Qatar Med J. 2022 Apr 4;2022(2):25. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.fqac.25. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penicillin (PNC) allergy is a major healthcare concern that necessitates antibiotic substitution which is associated with increased costs, worse clinical outcomes, and increased risks of antimicrobial resistance. Many patients are labeled as PNC allergic; however, this has been rarely confirmed. In this audit, we aimed to determine the characteristics of PNC allergy labeling.

METHODS

A list of all the patients labeled with PNC allergy who presented to the Hamad General Hospital (HGH) for any medical reason from January to December 2021 was generated from pharmacy system. Of those, 30% were randomly selected for audit review. Electronic health records of the selected patients were retrospectively reviewed to identify the allergy labeling characteristics and whether the patients had recently received an antibiotic within the PNC class without developing any allergic reaction.

RESULTS

Of the 464 patients identified with labelled PNC allergy, 139 patients were randomly selected and reviewed. Of the reviewed patients, 82 (59%) were women with an average ( ± SD) age of 46 ( ± 16.5) years. Forty-six patients were categorized to have a mild PNC allergy, and only 18 were categorized as severe with the remaining patients categorized as having a moderate PNC allergy. Despite documentation of severity, an accurate description of the allergic reaction event was significantly lacking with only 30/139 (21.5%) patients having clear documentation of the event description. Twenty (14.4%) patients labeled as PNC allergic received at least one antibiotic within the PNC class (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) safely without any documented reactions. Interestingly, of those 20 patients, 4 were categorized as being severely allergic to PNC. However, as more than 80 patients presented to the hospital for reasons not requiring antibiotics; experiences with PNC could not be assessed effectively.

CONCLUSION

Poor documentation of the details of allergic reactions may falsely affect future antibiotic decisions. The results of this audit highlight the need for standardizing the documentation process of medication allergy. In addition, reviewing the patient's experience with other drugs within the PNC class can guide healthcare providers during the PNC allergy evaluation.

摘要

背景

青霉素(PNC)过敏是一个重大的医疗问题,这使得抗生素替代成为必要,而抗生素替代与成本增加、临床结果更差以及抗菌药物耐药性风险增加有关。许多患者被标记为对PNC过敏;然而,这很少得到证实。在本次审核中,我们旨在确定PNC过敏标记的特征。

方法

从药房系统生成2021年1月至12月因任何医疗原因前往哈马德总医院(HGH)就诊且被标记为PNC过敏的所有患者名单。其中,30%被随机选择进行审核。对所选患者的电子健康记录进行回顾性审查,以确定过敏标记特征以及患者最近是否在PNC类别内接受过抗生素治疗且未出现任何过敏反应。

结果

在确定有PNC过敏标记的464名患者中,随机选择并审查了139名患者。在接受审查的患者中,82名(59%)为女性,平均(±标准差)年龄为46(±16.5)岁。46名患者被归类为轻度PNC过敏,只有18名被归类为重度,其余患者被归类为中度PNC过敏。尽管记录了严重程度,但对过敏反应事件的准确描述明显不足,只有30/139(21.5%)的患者有该事件的明确记录。20名(误)标记为PNC过敏的患者在PNC类别内(如哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦、氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦或阿莫西林 -克拉维酸)安全地接受了至少一种抗生素治疗,且无任何记录的反应。有趣的是,在这20名患者中,4名被归类为对PNC严重过敏。然而,由于超过80名患者因不需要抗生素的原因前来医院就诊,因此无法有效评估他们对PNC的用药经历。

结论

过敏反应细节记录不佳可能会错误地影响未来的抗生素决策。本次审核结果强调了规范药物过敏记录过程的必要性。此外,审查患者在PNC类别内使用其他药物的经历可以在PNC过敏评估期间为医疗服务提供者提供指导。

相似文献

3

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验