Suppr超能文献

将批判种族理论应用于定性新冠疫情公平性研究的综合方法

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

作者信息

Amani Bita, Cabral Alejandra, Sharif Mienah Z, Huỳnh James, Skrine Jeffers Kia, Baptista Shelby A, McAndrew Breann, Bradford Natalie J, de la Rocha Patanjali, Ford Chandra L

机构信息

Department of Urban Public Health, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA.

COVID-19 Task Force on Racism & Equity, Center for the Study of Racism, Social Justice, and Health, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2022 Jul 21;32(3):243-256. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.3.243. eCollection 2022 Summer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.

OBJECTIVE

This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.

SAMPLE

Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.

DESIGN

We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.

METHODS

A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.

RESULTS

The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.

摘要

背景

种族主义持续存在,这凸显了在疫情期间迅速记录黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)群体以及边缘化人群(如曾被监禁者)的观点和经历的必要性。

目的

本文提供了一个模型,用于运用公共卫生批判种族实践(PHCRP)及相关批判方法(即女性主义和去殖民化方法),为应对不断演变的新冠疫情而开展的定性研究的概念化、方法和传播提供信息。

样本

我们采用目的抽样滚雪球法,确定了参与BIPOC和社会边缘化人群健康公平与社会正义倡导的组织。焦点小组参与者(N = 63)包括社区成员、组织者、活动家及卫生工作者。

设计

我们使用Zoom软件,迅速连续开展了特定主题(如生殖正义)和特定人群(如亚太岛民)的焦点小组(N = 16个焦点小组)。

方法

一种自我反思、迭代的实践指导理论化、数据收集和分析。我们就研究设计、半结构化讨论指南、伦理考量和传播获取了社区意见。应用PHCRP,我们迭代地评估了我们的假设。我们逐字转录每次访谈,对数据进行去识别处理,然后使用两种不同的定性技术对其进行编码和分析:主题分析以识别焦点小组中反复出现的统一概念,叙事分析以完整保留每个参与者的故事。

结果

该实践促进了与合作伙伴的关系建设,并支持了对假设的迭代评估。后勤限制包括难以确保虚拟讨论的保密性。

结论

这些新颖的方法为疫情期间社区参与的定性研究提供了一个有效的模型。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验