Suppr超能文献

对临床特征进行随访直至第5天的新冠病毒核酸检测结果,可预测不确定结果的阳性情况。

Follow-up COVID-19 PCR result up to day 5 with clinical features predicts positivity for inconclusive results.

作者信息

Park Sung-Soo, Hong Duck-Jin, Gatchalian Katrine K, Oh Hye-Young

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa Specialty Hospital, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE.

Department of Pulmonology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Virol Plus. 2022 Aug;2(3):100100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100100. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

False-positive inconclusive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were not low and have potentially harmful effects. We aimed to find parameters to differentiate positive cases from false-positive ones, and suggest an optimal scheme and follow-up period for inconclusive results.

METHODS

Cases with inconclusive PCR tests among healthcare personnel from February 2020 to June 2021 were classified as confirmed positive, clinically positive, and clinically negative groups, which were compared. The diagnostic accuracy of follow-up tests and composites of clinical and laboratory data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Symptoms, contact history, and lower cycle threshold of the N gene were more common in the COVID-19 positive group. The scoring schemes combining symptom and contact history with follow-up PCR results had higher sensitivities than the PCR tests only modality. Follow-up tests up to 5 days combined with symptoms and contact history could discriminate between positive and negative cases.

CONCLUSION

A follow-up PCR test up to day 5 with clinical features might predict positivity and shorten the quarantine period in most healthcare personnel.

摘要

引言

针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的聚合酶链反应(PCR)假阳性不确定结果并不少见,且可能产生有害影响。我们旨在寻找区分阳性病例与假阳性病例的参数,并为不确定结果提出最佳方案及随访期。

方法

将2020年2月至2021年6月医护人员中PCR检测结果不确定的病例分为确诊阳性、临床阳性和临床阴性组,并进行比较。分析随访检测以及临床和实验室数据综合指标的诊断准确性。

结果

COVID-19阳性组更常见出现症状、接触史以及N基因较低的循环阈值。将症状和接触史与随访PCR结果相结合的评分方案比仅采用PCR检测的方式具有更高的敏感性。长达5天的随访检测结合症状和接触史可区分阳性和阴性病例。

结论

结合临床特征进行长达5天的随访PCR检测可能预测阳性情况,并缩短大多数医护人员的隔离期。

相似文献

9
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
10
Dealing with inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 PCR samples-Our experience.处理不确定的 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 样本-我们的经验。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268187. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

7
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs.新冠病毒检测假阳性结果:潜在问题与成本
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1167-1168. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30453-7. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验