• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制过程是领域通用的吗?对《适应还是不适应?领域通用认知控制问题》(坎,2013年)的复制研究

Are control processes domain-general? A replication of 'To adapt or not to adapt? The question of domain-general cognitive control' (Kan 2013).

作者信息

Dudschig Carolin

机构信息

Fachbereich Psychologie, University Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076 Tübingen.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jul 27;9(7):210550. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210550. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.210550
PMID:35911207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9326271/
Abstract

Conflict and conflict adaptation are well-studied phenomena in experimental psychology. Standard tasks investigating causes and outcomes of conflict during information processing include the Stroop, the Flanker and the Simon task. Interestingly, recent research efforts have moved toward investigating whether conflict in one task domain influences information processing in another task domain, typically referred to as cross-task conflict adaptation. These transfer effects are of central importance for theories about our cognitive architecture, as they are interpreted as pointing towards domain-general cognitive mechanisms. Given the importance of these cross-task transfer effects, the current paper targets at replicating one of the key findings. Specifically, Kan (Kan . 2013 , 637-651) showed that reading syntactically ambiguous sentences result in processing adjustments in subsequent Stroop trials. This result is in line with the idea that conflict monitoring works in a domain overarching manner. The present paper presents two replication studies: (i) exact replication: identical sentence-reading task intermixed with stimulus-based Stroop task and (ii) conceptual replication: identical sentence-reading task intermixed with response-based Stroop task. Power calculations were based on the original paper. Both experiments were pre-registered. Despite the experiments being closely designed according to the original study, there was no evidence supporting the hypothesis regarding cross-domain conflict adaptation.

摘要

冲突和冲突适应是实验心理学中经过充分研究的现象。研究信息处理过程中冲突的原因和结果的标准任务包括斯特鲁普任务、侧翼任务和西蒙任务。有趣的是,最近的研究工作已转向探究一个任务领域中的冲突是否会影响另一个任务领域中的信息处理,这通常被称为跨任务冲突适应。这些转移效应对于有关我们认知架构的理论至关重要,因为它们被解释为指向领域通用的认知机制。鉴于这些跨任务转移效应的重要性,本文旨在复制其中一项关键发现。具体而言,Kan(Kan. 2013, 637 - 651)表明,阅读句法歧义句会导致后续斯特鲁普试验中的处理调整。这一结果与冲突监测以领域总体方式起作用的观点一致。本文呈现了两项复制研究:(i)精确复制:将相同的句子阅读任务与基于刺激的斯特鲁普任务混合;(ii)概念复制:将相同的句子阅读任务与基于反应的斯特鲁普任务混合。功效计算基于原始论文。两项实验均进行了预注册。尽管实验是根据原始研究精心设计的,但没有证据支持关于跨领域冲突适应的假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/cb476e05b20b/rsos210550f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/bdc442975eeb/rsos210550f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/2b9faac4be75/rsos210550f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/353c5e1ea309/rsos210550f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/cb476e05b20b/rsos210550f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/bdc442975eeb/rsos210550f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/2b9faac4be75/rsos210550f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/353c5e1ea309/rsos210550f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b94b/9326271/cb476e05b20b/rsos210550f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Are control processes domain-general? A replication of 'To adapt or not to adapt? The question of domain-general cognitive control' (Kan 2013).控制过程是领域通用的吗?对《适应还是不适应?领域通用认知控制问题》(坎,2013年)的复制研究
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jul 27;9(7):210550. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210550. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan . (2013).是否存在跨领域一致性序列效应的证据?对Kan(2013年)的一项重复研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 3;8(3):191353. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191353.
4
To adapt or not to adapt: the question of domain-general cognitive control.适应还是不适应:一般性认知控制的问题。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):637-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
5
How flexible is cognitive control? (Mouse) tracking conflict adaptation across context similarities.认知控制的灵活性如何?(鼠标)在上下文相似性中跟踪冲突适应。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):562-579. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01874-0. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.空间Stroop任务中的认知控制:比较冲突监测与反应结果理论的预测
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Sep;189:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
7
The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.奖励在 Simon 任务中的影响:与 Stroop 和 Eriksen 侧翼任务的差异和相似之处。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):949-959. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02563-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
8
Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.冲突试验比例的影响:艾瑞克森和西蒙任务的比较。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):810-836. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02164-2. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
9
Dorsolateral prefrontal activity supports a cognitive space organization of cognitive control.背外侧前额叶活动支持认知控制的认知空间组织。
Elife. 2024 Mar 6;12:RP87126. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87126.
10
Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.在混合 Stroop-Simon 任务中,交互一致性效应阻止了关于一致性序列效应的领域特异性或一般性的结论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 May;46(5):945-967. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000769. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Transferable Modulation of Cognitive Control: The Cross-Task Role of Conflict Adaptation in Thematic Roles Assignment in Chinese.认知控制的可转移调节:冲突适应在中国语篇角色分配中的跨任务作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;15(7):899. doi: 10.3390/bs15070899.
2
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.模态与非模态认知:心理学各领域的一个统领性原则。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
How flexible is cognitive control? (Mouse) tracking conflict adaptation across context similarities.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension.认知控制对句子处理和理解的直接影响。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021;36(2):211-239. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1836379. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Replacing vertical actions by mouse movements: a web-suited paradigm for investigating vertical spatial associations.
认知控制的灵活性如何?(鼠标)在上下文相似性中跟踪冲突适应。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):562-579. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01874-0. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
4
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
用鼠标运动代替垂直动作:一种适用于研究垂直空间关联的网络范式。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):194-209. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01650-6. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Language and non-linguistic cognition: Shared mechanisms and principles reflected in the N400.语言与非语言认知:N400中反映出的共享机制与原则
Biol Psychol. 2022 Mar;169:108282. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108282. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
5
On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.关于认知控制行为测量的可靠性:任务抑制效应、任务准备效应、Stroop 样干扰和冲突适应效应的重测信度。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2158-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01627-x. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
6
Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan . (2013).是否存在跨领域一致性序列效应的证据?对Kan(2013年)的一项重复研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 3;8(3):191353. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191353.
7
The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online.时机大研究:比较一系列实验生成器,包括基于实验室的和在线的。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 20;8:e9414. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9414. eCollection 2020.
8
Negation as conflict: Conflict adaptation following negating vertical spatial words.否定即冲突:否定垂直空间词后的冲突适应。
Brain Lang. 2020 Nov;210:104842. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104842. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
9
The mapping between transformed reaction time costs and models of processing in aging and cognition.老化和认知中的转化反应时成本与加工模型之间的映射关系。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Nov;33(7):1093-1104. doi: 10.1037/pag0000298. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.积累模型解释反应时成本和准确率成本之间的低且可变相关性:荟萃分析和模拟。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;144(11):1200-1227. doi: 10.1037/bul0000164. Epub 2018 Sep 27.