Yao Mengmeng, Wang Jing, Liu Panting, Guo Yanru, Xie Yachun, Zhang Lei, Su Nan, Li Yanwei, Yu Dongchuan, Hong Qin, Chi Xia
School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 13;13:918163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918163. eCollection 2022.
Early identification of children at risk of learning disorders (LD) may mitigate the adverse effects of delayed intervention by guiding children to receive preventive services at an earlier age. However, there is no assessment tool for the early identification of children at risk of LD in Mainland China. Therefore, this study aimed to create a Chinese version of the Preschool Learning Skills Scale and investigate its validity and reliability.
Firstly, a pilot scale was designed based on literature review and expert review. Secondly, a pre-survey of the pilot scale was conducted. In phase 3, a formal survey was carried out to test the reliability and validity of the scale by involving 2,677 preschool children from 7 kindergartens. Data were collected using a checklist for demographic characteristics, the preschool learning skills scale, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version (BRIEF-P), and Conners' Rating Scales.
The final scale included 38 items under seven factors. The reliability and validity tests confirmed that the Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability coefficients of the scale were 0.946, 0.888, and 0.941, respectively. The Spearman correlations of factor-total score ranged from 0.685 to 0.876. The results of criterion-related validity showed a direct and significant association between the preschool learning skills scale with the BRIEF-P ( = 0.641, < 0.001) and the cognitive problems factor of Conners' Rating Scales ( = 0.564, < 0.001). The model had a good fit (χ = 3.489, RMSEA = 0.047, RMR = 0.024, CFI = 0.912, TLI = 0.900, and IFI = 0.912). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural and measurement invariance on the preschool learning skills scale across gender and grade.
The developed preschool learning skills scale has good reliability and validity, indicating that the scale can be used to identify preschool children at risk of LD and can be recommended for use in clinical research and practice.
早期识别有学习障碍(LD)风险的儿童,可通过引导儿童在更早的年龄接受预防服务,减轻延迟干预的不利影响。然而,中国大陆尚无用于早期识别有LD风险儿童的评估工具。因此,本研究旨在创建中文版的《学前学习技能量表》并调查其效度和信度。
首先,基于文献综述和专家评审设计一个初步量表。其次,对初步量表进行预调查。在第三阶段,通过纳入来自7所幼儿园的2677名学龄前儿童进行正式调查,以检验该量表的信度和效度。使用人口统计学特征清单、学前学习技能量表、执行功能行为评定量表 - 学前版(BRIEF - P)和康纳斯评定量表收集数据。
最终量表包括七个因素下的38个项目。信度和效度测试证实,该量表的克朗巴哈系数、分半信度和重测信度系数分别为0.946、0.888和0.941。因素与总分的斯皮尔曼相关性在0.685至0.876之间。效标关联效度结果显示,学前学习技能量表与BRIEF - P(r = 0.641,p < 0.001)以及康纳斯评定量表的认知问题因子(r = 0.564,p < 0.001)之间存在直接且显著的关联。该模型拟合良好(χ² = 3.489,RMSEA = 0.047,RMR = 0.024,CFI = 0.912,TLI = 0.900,IFI = 0.912)。多组验证性因素分析支持学前学习技能量表在性别和年级上的结构和测量不变性。
所开发的学前学习技能量表具有良好的信度和效度,表明该量表可用于识别有LD风险的学龄前儿童,并可推荐用于临床研究和实践。