Suppr超能文献

紧急医疗服务临床医生对儿科非转运情况的看法。

Emergency Medical Services Clinicians' Perspectives on Pediatric Non-Transport.

作者信息

Ward Caleb E, Singletary Judith, Hatcliffe Rachel E, Colson Cindy D, Simpson Joelle N, Brown Kathleen M, Chamberlain James M

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(8):993-1003. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2108180. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Emergency medical services clinicians do not transport one-third of all children assessed, even without official pediatric non-transport protocols. Little is known about how EMS clinicians and caregivers decide not to transport a child. Our objectives were to describe how EMS clinicians currently decide whether or not to transport a child and identify barriers to and enablers of successfully implementing an EMS clinician-initiated pediatric non-transport protocol.

METHODS

We conducted six virtual focus groups with EMS clinicians from the mid-Atlantic. A PhD trained facilitator moderated all groups using a semi-structured moderator guide. Multiple investigators independently coded a deidentified sample transcript. One team member then completed axial coding of the remaining transcripts. Thematic saturation was achieved. Clusters of similar codes were grouped into themes by consensus.

RESULTS

We recruited 50 participants, of whom 70% were paramedics and 28% emergency medical technicians. There was agreement that caregivers often use 9-1-1 for low acuity complaints. Participants stated that non-transport usually occurs after shared decision-making between EMS clinicians and caregivers; EMS clinicians advise whether transport is necessary, but caregivers are responsible for making the final decision and signing refusal documentation. Subthemes for how non-transport decisions were made included the presence of agency protocols, caregiver preferences, absence of a guardian on the scene, EMS clinician variability, and distance to the nearest ED. Participants identified the following features that would enable successful implementation of an EMS clinician-initiated non-transport process: a user-friendly interface, clear protocol endpoints, the inclusion of vital sign parameters, resources to leave with caregivers, and optional direct medical oversight.

CONCLUSIONS

EMS clinicians in our study agreed that non-transport is currently a caregiver decision, but noted a collaborative process of shared decision-making where EMS clinicians advise caregivers whether transport is indicated. Further research is needed to understand the safety of this practice. This study suggests there may be a need for EMS-initiated alternative disposition/non-transport protocols.

摘要

目的

即使没有官方的儿科非转运方案,紧急医疗服务临床医生也不会转运三分之一接受评估的儿童。对于紧急医疗服务临床医生和护理人员如何决定不转运儿童,我们知之甚少。我们的目的是描述紧急医疗服务临床医生目前如何决定是否转运儿童,并确定成功实施由紧急医疗服务临床医生发起的儿科非转运方案的障碍和促成因素。

方法

我们与来自大西洋中部地区的紧急医疗服务临床医生进行了六次虚拟焦点小组讨论。一名受过博士培训的主持人使用半结构化主持人指南主持所有小组讨论。多名研究人员对一份去识别化的样本转录本进行独立编码。然后,一名团队成员对其余转录本进行轴心编码。实现了主题饱和。通过共识将相似代码的聚类分组为主题。

结果

我们招募了50名参与者,其中70%是护理人员,28%是紧急医疗技术员。大家一致认为,护理人员经常因低严重程度的投诉拨打911。参与者表示,非转运通常发生在紧急医疗服务临床医生和护理人员共同决策之后;紧急医疗服务临床医生会告知是否需要转运,但护理人员负责做出最终决定并签署拒绝转运文件。关于如何做出非转运决定的子主题包括机构方案的存在、护理人员的偏好、现场没有监护人、紧急医疗服务临床医生的差异以及到最近急诊室的距离。参与者确定了以下有助于成功实施由紧急医疗服务临床医生发起的非转运流程的特征:用户友好的界面、明确的方案终点、生命体征参数的纳入、留给护理人员的资源以及可选的直接医疗监督。

结论

我们研究中的紧急医疗服务临床医生一致认为,目前非转运是护理人员决定的,但指出这是一个共同决策的协作过程,紧急医疗服务临床医生会告知护理人员是否需要转运。需要进一步研究以了解这种做法的安全性。这项研究表明可能需要由紧急医疗服务发起的替代处置/非转运方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验