Suppr超能文献

将孕妇和哺乳期妇女纳入非产科随机对照试验。

Inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in nonobstetrical randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Jorgensen Sarah C J, Miljanic Simona, Tabbara Najla, Somanader Deborah, Leung Felicia, De Castro Charmaine, Tse Christopher L Y, Law Janice, Fernandes Virginia, Lapinsky Stephen E, Malhamé Isabelle, Burry Lisa

机构信息

Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Jorgensen and Burry).

Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Miljanic, Tabbara, Law, Fernandes, and Burry).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100700. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100700. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need to prioritize and expedite the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in research. Characterizing trials that have successfully included these populations could inform the design and execution of future studies. In addition, up-to-date data on their inclusion in clinical research could assist in setting benchmarks, establishing targets, and monitoring progress toward more equitable inclusion.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize the eligibility and enrollment of pregnant and breastfeeding women in randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for nonobstetrical conditions experienced by, but not limited to, these populations.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a literature search in collaboration with an information specialist. We included randomized controlled trials published between 2017 and 2019 in the 5 highest-impact general medicine journals and the 3 highest-impact specialty journals in cardiovascular disease, critical care, general infectious diseases, HIV, and psychiatry. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated screening, diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of nonobstetrical medical conditions. We excluded randomized controlled trials exclusively focused on males, pediatrics, geriatrics, oncology, or postmenopausal women, and publications reporting subgroup, pooled, or follow-up analyses of previously published randomized controlled trials. We screened titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. We entered data into a standardized electronic case report form. We reviewed study protocols, appendices, and trial registries for additional data.

RESULTS

Of the 1333 randomized controlled trials, pregnant and breastfeeding women were eligible for 13 (1.0%) and 6 (0.5%), respectively. Pregnancy and breastfeeding eligibility criteria were not addressed in 383 of 1333 (28.7%) and 710 of 1333 (53.3%) randomized controlled trials, respectively. In total, 102 of 937 (10.9%) and 33 of 617 (5.3%) randomized controlled trials that explicitly excluded pregnant and breastfeeding women documented the rationale. Most studies excluding pregnant women (542/937; 57.8%) required at least 1 method of contraception and/or pregnancy testing as part of trial participation for women with reproductive capacity. Among the 13 randomized controlled trials that allowed inclusion of pregnant women, 3 restricted eligibility to specific trimesters. Two randomized controlled trials enrolled pregnant women after the first year of the study following interim review of safety results in nonpregnant participants. Four randomized controlled trials reported the number of pregnant women enrolled, which ranged from 0.7% to 3.4% of the study population. None of the studies reported on pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Compared with randomized controlled trials that excluded pregnant women, those including them more commonly had an infectious disease focus (12/13 [92.3%] vs 270/937 [28.8%]; p<.0001), including HIV (5/13 [38.5%] vs 96/937 [10.2%]; p=.0079), enrolled participants in sub-Saharan Africa (5/13 [38.5%] vs 111/937 [11.8%]; p=.0143), and had exclusively nonindustry sponsorship (13/13 [100%] vs 559/937 [59.7%]; p=.0025); inclusion varied by study phase, randomization level, and intervention type.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates a major inequity in research involving pregnant and breastfeeding women. As new health challenges arise, including novel pandemics, and the research community mobilizes to develop therapies and innovate in patient care, it is crucial that pregnant and breastfeeding women not be left behind. Greater regulatory support, in the form of explicit requirements and incentives, will be needed to ensure these populations are integrated into the research agenda.

摘要

背景

迫切需要优先并加快将孕妇和哺乳期妇女纳入研究。对成功纳入这些人群的试验进行特征描述,可为未来研究的设计和实施提供参考。此外,有关她们参与临床研究的最新数据有助于设定基准、确立目标并监测在实现更公平纳入方面的进展。

目的

本研究旨在描述孕妇和哺乳期妇女在评估针对这些人群所患(但不限于)非产科疾病干预措施的随机对照试验中的资格和入组情况。

研究设计

我们与一名信息专家合作开展了文献检索。纳入了2017年至2019年在5种影响因子最高的普通医学期刊以及心血管疾病、重症监护、普通传染病、艾滋病和精神病学领域3种影响因子最高的专科期刊上发表的随机对照试验。纳入评估非产科疾病筛查、诊断、预防或治疗的随机对照试验。排除专门针对男性、儿科、老年科、肿瘤学或绝经后妇女的随机对照试验,以及报告先前发表的随机对照试验的亚组分析、汇总分析或随访分析的出版物。我们独立且重复地筛选标题和摘要,如有分歧由第三位审阅者解决。我们将数据录入标准化电子病例报告表。我们查阅研究方案、附录和试验注册信息以获取更多数据。

结果

在1333项随机对照试验中,孕妇和哺乳期妇女分别有13项(1.0%)和6项(0.5%)符合资格。在1333项(28.7%)和1333项(53.3%)随机对照试验中,分别有383项和710项未提及妊娠和哺乳期的资格标准。在明确排除孕妇和哺乳期妇女的937项(10.9%)和617项(5.3%)随机对照试验中,分别有102项和33项记录了排除理由。大多数排除孕妇的研究(542/937;57.8%)要求有生殖能力的女性作为试验参与的一部分,至少采用1种避孕方法和/或妊娠检测。在13项允许纳入孕妇的随机对照试验中,3项将资格限制在特定孕期。2项随机对照试验在对非孕妇参与者的安全性结果进行中期审查后,于研究的第一年之后纳入孕妇。4项随机对照试验报告了纳入孕妇的数量,占研究人群的0.7%至3.4%不等。没有研究报告妊娠或围产期结局。与排除孕妇的随机对照试验相比,纳入孕妇的试验更常见地聚焦于传染病(12/13 [92.3%] 对270/937 [28.8%];p<0.0001),包括艾滋病(5/1

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验