Suppr超能文献

孕妇有机会参与临床试验吗?对英国国家卫生研究院健康技术评估资助的试验人员的一项探索性调查。

Do pregnant people have opportunities to participate in clinical trials? an exploratory survey of NIHR HTA-funded trialists.

作者信息

Burrow Rebekah, Hinton Lisa, Clarke Mike

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Trials. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08949-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pregnant people are often excluded from clinical trials, primarily due to safety concerns. However, exclusion causes population-level harms as well as sometimes providing individual protection. Harms caused to pregnant people by exclusion from clinical trials have been clearly evidenced and highlighted during the COVID pandemic. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has since provided guidance on improving inclusion of under-served groups, which includes pregnant people, in clinical research. Appropriate inclusion and active facilitation to participate are required to provide equitable evidence-based healthcare during pregnancy and to comply with ethical principles for research.

METHODS

We carried out an exploratory, online, cross-sectional survey of trialists to assess whether, why, and how pregnant people are included or excluded from clinical trials funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, with awards starting in 2022-2023. Trialists were the respondents, with trials the primary focus of this survey. Invitations were sent to trialists between October 2023 and March 2024. Summary statistics were calculated to describe the characteristics of the trials and respondents, to describe eligibility of pregnant people, reasons for this, and how this eligibility is documented and implemented.

RESULTS

We identified 120 trials of which 88 were eligible for this survey. Responses were received for 81 trials. Pregnant people are excluded from 34 of these 81 trials. Pregnant people are eligible for inclusion in 40 of the 81 trials, including four which partially exclude people during pregnancy. Eligibility is unclear for seven trials. Exclusions are mostly for safety reasons. Sponsors and regulatory authorities are unnecessary barriers to inclusion in some trials. Eight trials of 40 trials make explicit or deliberate attempts to include people during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of the 120 trials include people during pregnancy. Most trials for which pregnant people are eligible do not report explicitly including people during pregnancy or facilitating their inclusion. A small number of trials, different in setting, clinical area, and intervention type, are intentionally designed and conducted in a way that include people during pregnancy. There are clear opportunities to improve the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials in the NIHR HTA Programme.

摘要

背景

孕妇通常被排除在临床试验之外,主要是出于安全考虑。然而,这种排除不仅会对个体造成伤害,也会产生群体层面的危害。在新冠疫情期间,临床试验排除孕妇所造成的危害已得到明确证实并受到关注。此后,英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)发布了相关指南,以提高包括孕妇在内的弱势群体在临床研究中的纳入率。为了在孕期提供公平的循证医疗服务并遵守研究伦理原则,需要进行适当的纳入并积极促进孕妇参与临床试验。

方法

我们对试验人员开展了一项探索性的在线横断面调查,以评估2022 - 2023年起由NIHR卫生技术评估(HTA)计划资助的临床试验中,孕妇被纳入或排除的情况、原因及方式。试验人员作为受访者,本次调查主要聚焦于试验。2023年10月至2024年3月期间向试验人员发送了邀请。计算汇总统计数据,以描述试验和受访者的特征,描述孕妇的 eligibility、原因,以及这种eligibility是如何记录和实施的。

结果

我们识别出120项试验,其中88项符合本次调查要求。收到了81项试验的回复。在这81项试验中,有34项排除了孕妇。81项试验中有40项孕妇 eligible 纳入,其中四项在孕期部分排除人群。七项试验的eligibility不明确。排除大多是出于安全原因。在一些试验中,申办者和监管机构是纳入的不必要障碍。40项试验中有八项明确或有意尝试在孕期纳入人群。

结论

120项试验中少数在孕期纳入人群。大多数孕妇 eligible 的试验并未明确报告在孕期纳入人群或促进其纳入。少数试验,在设置、临床领域和干预类型上有所不同,以有意设计和开展的方式在孕期纳入人群。在NIHR HTA计划中,有明显机会提高孕妇在临床试验中的纳入率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a4/12232068/28a94f370793/13063_2025_8949_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

本文引用的文献

2
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3.
3
Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy and the effects on maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review.
Scand J Surg. 2023 Sep;112(3):187-205. doi: 10.1177/14574969231175569. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Walking the walk to include pregnant participants in non-obstetric clinical trials: Insights from the SNAP Trial.
Obstet Med. 2023 Mar;16(1):3-4. doi: 10.1177/1753495X231163351. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnancy: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 6;13(3):e067585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067585.
6
Facilitating participation in clinical trials during pregnancy.
BMJ. 2023 Feb 6;380:e071278. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071278.
7
Inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in nonobstetrical randomized controlled trials.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100700. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100700. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
8
Inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 treatment trials: a review and global call to action.
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Mar;9(3):e366-e371. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30484-8. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Making pharmaceutical research and regulation work for women.
BMJ. 2020 Oct 27;371:m3808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3808.
10
Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women's participation in research: A systematic review.
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):350-361. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验