• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Organisation, influence, and impact of patient advisory boards in rehabilitation institutions-an explorative cross-sectional study.康复机构中患者咨询委员会的组织、影响和作用:一项探索性的横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 2;23(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05678-y.
2
The Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool: forward-backwards translation and cultural adaption to Norwegian.公众和患者参与评估工具:从英文到挪威文的反向翻译和文化调适。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05514-3.
3
Preference-based patient participation in intermediate care: Translation, validation and piloting of the 4Ps in Norway.基于偏好的患者参与中期护理:4Ps 在挪威的翻译、验证和试点。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13899. doi: 10.1111/hex.13899. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Patient engagement in hospital health service planning and improvement: a scoping review.患者参与医院健康服务规划与改进:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e018263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018263.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices.患者和家属参与:美国医院实践调查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):182-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004006. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
The Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ): psychometric evaluation and revision for use in neurological rehabilitation.患者参与康复问卷(PPRQ):在神经康复中使用的心理测量学评估和修订。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May;42(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1528303. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Users' Perspectives on the Organization of Rehabilitation Services - A Focus Group Study of User Organization Representatives in Norway.用户对康复服务组织的看法——挪威用户组织代表的焦点小组研究
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70139. doi: 10.1111/hex.70139.
2
Patient and public involvement in rheumatic and musculoskeletal research: an idea whose time has firmly come.患者和公众参与风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病研究:一个时机已然成熟的理念。
BMC Rheumatol. 2023 May 31;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41927-023-00340-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool: forward-backwards translation and cultural adaption to Norwegian.公众和患者参与评估工具:从英文到挪威文的反向翻译和文化调适。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05514-3.
2
Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的全球康复需求估计:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care.21世纪的父母有何期望?青少年综合护理的定性分析
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Aug 17;20(3):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5419.
4
"Patient participation" and related concepts: A scoping review on their dimensional composition.“患者参与”及相关概念:对其维度构成的范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
Person-centred care: what is it and how do we get there?以患者为中心的护理:它是什么以及我们如何实现?
Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun;3(2):114-116. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-114.
6
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
7
The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting.在初级保健环境中,以患者为中心的护理和护理共同创造对于满足多病症患者的护理满意度以及身体和社会幸福感的重要性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y.
8
Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review.用于医疗保健组织和系统决策中的患者参与度的度量和评估工具:系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):889-903. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43.
9
How healthcare professionals experience patient participation in designing healthcare services and products. A qualitative study in the field of spinal cord injury in Switzerland.医疗保健专业人员如何体验患者参与医疗服务和产品设计。瑞士脊髓损伤领域的一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1452-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Patient, carer and public involvement in major system change in acute stroke services: The construction of value.患者、护理人员和公众在急性脑卒中服务重大系统变革中的参与:价值的构建。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):685-692. doi: 10.1111/hex.12668. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

康复机构中患者咨询委员会的组织、影响和作用:一项探索性的横断面研究。

Organisation, influence, and impact of patient advisory boards in rehabilitation institutions-an explorative cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, P.O. Box 4, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 2;23(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05678-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05678-y
PMID:35915435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9343240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient participation is highlighted as an important facilitator for patient-centered care. Patient participation organised as patient advisory boards (PABs) is an integral part of health care institutions in Norway. More knowledge is needed on how PAB representatives experience patient engagement (PE) with regard to organisation, influence, and impact. The objective was to describe how PAB representatives experience their tasks, roles, and impact on decision-making processes and service delivery in the setting of rehabilitation institutions.

METHODS

PAB representatives recruited from rehabilitation institutions completed the Norwegian version of the generic Public and Patient Engagement evaluation tool (Norwegian abbreviation EBNOR). EBNOR is tested for reliability and validity with good results and comprises 35 items within four main domains, policies and practices, participatory culture, collaboration, and influence and impact that provide responses about PE-levels. The domain items are scored from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" on a five-point scale, in addition to a don't know category. Items in the domain "influence and impact" are scored from "never" to "all of the time" on a four-point scale. Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages, and response categories were collapsed into three PE-levels: barrier, intermediate, and facilitating level. Free-text responses were analysed according to principles of manifest content analysis, summed up, and used to elaborate the results of the scores.

RESULTS

Of the 150 contacted PAB representatives, 47 (32%) consented to participate. The results showed that approximately 75% agreed that the organisation as a whole was strengthened as a result of patient participation. Four out of five domains were scored indicating a facilitating level; policies and practices (53%), participatory culture (53%), collaboration and common purpose (37%), and final thoughts (63%). The modal score in the domain influence and impact was in the intermediate PE-level (44%). Of a total of 34 codes from free text analyses, barriers to PE were coded 26 times, and PE facilitators were coded 8 times.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that most PAB representatives are satisfied with how rehabilitation institutions organise their PAB, but they still experience their impact as limited.

摘要

背景

患者参与被强调为以患者为中心的护理的重要促进因素。以患者咨询委员会 (PAB) 的形式组织的患者参与是挪威医疗机构不可或缺的一部分。我们需要更多了解 PAB 代表在组织、影响和影响方面体验患者参与的情况。目的是描述 PAB 代表在康复机构的背景下,如何体验他们的任务、角色以及对决策过程和服务提供的影响。

方法

从康复机构招募的 PAB 代表填写了挪威版通用公众和患者参与评估工具 (简称 EBNOR)。EBNOR 的可靠性和有效性经过了测试,结果良好,包括四个主要领域的 35 个项目,即政策和实践、参与文化、合作以及影响和影响,这些项目提供了关于参与水平的信息。在五分制上,从“强烈不同意”到“强烈同意”对领域项目进行评分,另外还有“不知道”选项。“影响和影响”领域的项目在四分制上从“从不”到“一直”进行评分。使用频率和百分比对分类数据进行总结,并将响应类别合并为三个参与水平:障碍、中间和促进水平。根据显式内容分析的原则对自由文本回复进行分析、总结,并用于阐述分数的结果。

结果

在联系的 150 名 PAB 代表中,有 47 名(32%)同意参与。结果表明,大约 75%的代表同意患者参与使整个组织得到加强。五个领域中有四个领域的评分表明处于促进水平;政策和实践(53%)、参与文化(53%)、合作和共同目标(37%)以及最终想法(63%)。“影响和影响”领域的模态得分处于中间参与水平(44%)。在对自由文本分析的 34 个代码中,共有 26 次记录了参与障碍,8 次记录了参与促进因素。

结论

研究结果表明,大多数 PAB 代表对康复机构组织 PAB 的方式感到满意,但他们仍然认为自己的影响有限。