• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警示标志对乌干达雨林中圈套陷阱存在情况的影响。

The effect of warning signs on the presence of snare traps in a Ugandan rainforest.

作者信息

Fedurek Pawel, Akankwasa John W, Danel Dariusz P, Fensome Samuel, Zuberbühler Klaus, Muhanguzi Geoffrey, Crockford Catherine, Asiimwe Caroline

机构信息

Division of Psychology Faculty of Natural Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK.

Budongo Conservation Field Station Masindi Uganda.

出版信息

Biotropica. 2022 May;54(3):721-728. doi: 10.1111/btp.13088. Epub 2022 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1111/btp.13088
PMID:35915833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314064/
Abstract

Since chimpanzee () conservation often involves local human populations, conservation strategies must consider psychological factors that impact their behavior. In Budongo Forest, Uganda, for example, local communities commonly engage in snare trap (hereafter: snare) setting for wild meat. This illegal activity posits a substantial threat to wild chimpanzees, causing permanent wounds or death for those who are snared. Despite various schemes previously implemented to address snare setting-an activity that is fueled by poverty, the problem and its detrimental impact on chimpanzees persists. Here, we experimentally tested a novel intervention, a systematic display of specially designed warning signs aimed at local poachers. We monitored the presence of snares before and after introducing these signs over a total period of two years and compared it with that of a similar sized control area with no intervention. Results show that snares were less likely to be present during the "sign" period than during the "non-sign" period in the experimental but not in the control area. We discuss the potential of this cost-effective intervention for limiting illegal activities that pose a severe threat to chimpanzees and other species inhabiting tropical forests.

摘要

由于黑猩猩的保护工作通常涉及当地人群,保护策略必须考虑影响他们行为的心理因素。例如,在乌干达的布东戈森林,当地社区普遍设置陷阱(以下简称:陷阱)猎捕野生动物。这种非法活动对野生黑猩猩构成了重大威胁,被陷阱捕获的黑猩猩会受到永久性伤害甚至死亡。尽管此前实施了各种计划来解决设陷阱问题——这种活动因贫困而加剧,但问题及其对黑猩猩的有害影响依然存在。在此,我们通过实验测试了一种新的干预措施,即向当地偷猎者系统展示专门设计的警告标志。我们在两年的时间里监测了引入这些标志前后陷阱的出现情况,并将其与未进行干预的类似规模控制区域进行比较。结果表明,在实验区域,“有标志”期间出现陷阱的可能性低于“无标志”期间,但在控制区域并非如此。我们讨论了这种具有成本效益的干预措施对于限制对黑猩猩和栖息在热带森林中的其他物种构成严重威胁的非法活动的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/5058ab2bb493/BTP-54-721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/2d2bf3daf5a0/BTP-54-721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/4cd79ed7b8db/BTP-54-721-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/0283076b4386/BTP-54-721-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/5058ab2bb493/BTP-54-721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/2d2bf3daf5a0/BTP-54-721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/4cd79ed7b8db/BTP-54-721-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/0283076b4386/BTP-54-721-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7865/9314064/5058ab2bb493/BTP-54-721-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of warning signs on the presence of snare traps in a Ugandan rainforest.警示标志对乌干达雨林中圈套陷阱存在情况的影响。
Biotropica. 2022 May;54(3):721-728. doi: 10.1111/btp.13088. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
2
Removing snares is an effective conservation intervention: a case study involving chimpanzees.去除套索是一种有效的保护干预措施:一个涉及黑猩猩的案例研究。
Primates. 2024 Jul;65(4):257-263. doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01139-3. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
First report of prey capture from human laid snare-traps by wild chimpanzees.野生黑猩猩利用人类设置的陷阱捕获猎物的首次报告。
Primates. 2014 Jul;55(3):437-40. doi: 10.1007/s10329-014-0419-1. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
4
Deactivation of snares by wild chimpanzees.野生黑猩猩解除圈套
Primates. 2011 Jan;52(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10329-010-0212-8. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
5
Tool-use to obtain honey by chimpanzees at Bulindi: new record from Uganda.布林迪的黑猩猩利用工具获取蜂蜜:乌干达的新记录。
Primates. 2011 Oct;52(4):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s10329-011-0254-6. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
6
Habitual ground nesting in the Bugoma Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), Uganda.乌干达布戈马森林中的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)有习惯性的地面筑巢行为。
Am J Primatol. 2024 Feb;86(2):e23583. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23583. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
7
Cars kill chimpanzees: case report of a wild chimpanzee killed on a road at Bulindi, Uganda.汽车撞死黑猩猩:乌干达布林迪一条道路上一只野生黑猩猩被撞死的病例报告。
Primates. 2016 Jul;57(3):377-88. doi: 10.1007/s10329-016-0528-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Variation in hunting behaviour in neighbouring chimpanzee communities in the Budongo forest, Uganda.乌干达布东戈森林中相邻黑猩猩群落狩猎行为的差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178065. eCollection 2017.
9
Friends in high places: Interspecific grooming between chimpanzees and primate prey species in Budongo Forest.高处的朋友:布顿哥森林中黑猩猩与灵长类猎物之间的种间理毛行为。
Primates. 2023 May;64(3):325-337. doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01053-0. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
10
Illegal Harvesting within a Protected Area: Spatial Distribution of Activities, Social Drivers of Wild Meat Consumption, and Wildlife Conservation.保护区内的非法捕猎:活动的空间分布、食用野味的社会驱动因素及野生动物保护
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;13(5):771. doi: 10.3390/ani13050771.

本文引用的文献

1
Bushmeat Exploitation in Tropical Forests: an Intercontinental Comparison.热带森林中的丛林肉开发:一项洲际比较
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):232-237. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00275.x.
2
A Severe Lack of Evidence Limits Effective Conservation of the World's Primates.严重缺乏证据限制了对世界灵长类动物的有效保护。
Bioscience. 2020 Aug 26;70(9):794-803. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa082. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
The challenge of biased evidence in conservation.保护中的有偏证据的挑战。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):249-262. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13577. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
4
Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity.人类活动破坏了黑猩猩的行为多样性。
Science. 2019 Mar 29;363(6434):1453-1455. doi: 10.1126/science.aau4532. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Evidence complacency hampers conservation.证据自满阻碍保护工作。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1215-1216. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0244-1.
6
Improvement of the performance of animal crossing warning signs.动物穿越警告标志性能的改进。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
Impending extinction crisis of the world's primates: Why primates matter.世界灵长类动物即将灭绝的危机:为什么灵长类动物很重要。
Sci Adv. 2017 Jan 18;3(1):e1600946. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600946. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Wildlife Warning Signs: Public Assessment of Components, Placement and Designs to Optimise Driver Response.野生动物警示标志:公众对组件、放置位置及设计的评估以优化驾驶员反应
Animals (Basel). 2013 Dec 17;3(4):1142-61. doi: 10.3390/ani3041142.
9
Impact evaluation to communicate and improve conservation non-governmental organization performance: the case of Conservation International.通过影响评估来沟通并提升保护领域非政府组织的绩效:以国际保护组织为例。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0282.
10
Apes in the Anthropocene: flexibility and survival.人类世的猿类:灵活性与生存
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Apr;30(4):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 9.