Nicholas M. Hudak, MPA, MSEd,PA-C,is an associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health and clinical coordinator for the Division of Physician Assistant Studies at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina.
Melinda Blazar, MHS, PA-C,is an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health and director of clinical education for the Division of Physician Assistant Studies at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina.
J Physician Assist Educ. 2022 Sep 1;33(3):185-191. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000451. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Many physician assistant (PA) students experience mistreatment in clinical learning environments, and accredited PA programs are required to define, publish, and make readily available policies and procedures for student reports of mistreatment. The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence, content, and dissemination of program policies to address students' reports of mistreatment involving preceptors during supervised clinical experiences.
To conduct a national policy analysis, the investigators included 10 new survey items in the 2019 Physician Assistant Education Association annual program survey. Deidentified data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics.
The program response rate to the survey items was 99% (232). Approximately 76% of PA programs reported having a learner mistreatment policy. Policy content across programs varied widely, and several student reporting mechanisms were available. Program directors, clinical faculty, and institutional leadership were most likely to be involved in the management of reports. A majority programs actively assessed for mistreatment and most did so through clinical course evaluations and at the end of each clinical phase course. Most programs disseminated information about policy to faculty, students, and preceptors at least once a year.
The descriptions of policy content, procedures, and dissemination increase educators' understanding of current policies across PA programs in the context of renewed efforts to write or revise policy that is specific to mistreatment. The authors discuss key policy priorities to define mistreatment, offer a range of confidential reporting mechanisms, review the management of reports, and consider how to optimize dissemination strategies.
许多医师助理(PA)学生在临床学习环境中经历虐待,而获得认可的 PA 项目必须定义、发布并随时提供有关学生报告虐待事件的政策和程序。本研究的目的是描述解决涉及监督临床经验中的导师的学生报告虐待事件的课程政策的普遍性、内容和传播。
为了进行国家政策分析,研究人员在 2019 年医师助理教育协会年度项目调查中增加了 10 个新的调查项目。使用描述性统计数据对匿名数据进行分析。
对调查项目的项目回复率为 99%(232)。大约 76%的 PA 项目报告称有学习者虐待政策。课程政策内容在各个项目之间差异很大,并且有几种学生报告机制可供使用。项目主任、临床教师和机构领导最有可能参与报告的管理。大多数课程积极评估虐待情况,大多数课程通过临床课程评估和每个临床阶段课程结束时进行评估。大多数课程每年至少向教师、学生和导师传播一次有关政策的信息。
在重新努力编写或修订具体针对虐待的政策的背景下,政策内容、程序和传播的描述增加了教育工作者对 PA 课程中当前政策的理解。作者讨论了定义虐待的关键政策重点,提供了一系列保密报告机制,审查了报告的管理,并考虑了如何优化传播策略。