Suppr超能文献

治疗性超声波与局部麻醉注射治疗腹直肌筋膜综合征所致慢性盆腔痛的随机临床试验。

Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 8°Andar, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01910-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as recurrent or continuous pain in the lower abdomen or pelvis, either non-menstrual or noncyclical, lasting for at least 6 months. There is strong evidence that up to 85% of patients with CPP have serious dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system, including abdominal myofascial pain syndrome (AMPS). AMPS is characterized by intense and deep abdominal pain, originating from hyperirritable trigger points, usually located within a musculoskeletal band or its lining fascia. In the literature, there are few studies that address AMPS.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) and injection of local anesthetic (IA) to improve pain in women with abdominal myofascial syndrome secondary to CPP.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Tertiary University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted, patients were allocated to two types of treatment: group TUS (n = 18), and group IA (n = 20). The instruments used for evaluation and reassessment were the Visual Analog Scale, Numerical Categorical Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36 quality of life assessment questionnaire. They were evaluated before starting treatment, 1 week after the end of treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life through the variables analyzed among study participants. There was no significant difference between groups.

LIMITATIONS

absence of blinding; exclusion of women with comorbidities and other causes of CPP, the absence of a placebo group, the difference between the number of sessions used for each technique, and the COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life in women with AMPS secondary to CPP.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

We declare that this clinical trial has been registered under the number [(ReBEC) no. RBR-39czsv] on 07/18/2018 in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials.

摘要

背景

慢性盆腔痛(CPP)定义为下腹部或骨盆反复或持续疼痛,非月经或非周期性,持续至少 6 个月。有强有力的证据表明,高达 85%的 CPP 患者存在严重的肌肉骨骼系统功能障碍,包括腹部肌筋膜疼痛综合征(AMPS)。AMPS 的特征是剧烈而深部的腹痛,源自于超敏触发点,通常位于肌肉骨骼带或其衬里筋膜内。在文献中,很少有研究涉及 AMPS。

目的

评估和比较治疗性超声(TUS)和局部麻醉剂注射(IA)治疗 CPP 继发腹部肌筋膜综合征女性疼痛的疗效。

研究设计

随机对照临床试验。

设置

三级大学医院。

材料和方法

进行了一项随机临床试验,患者被分配到两种治疗类型:TUS 组(n=18)和 IA 组(n=20)。用于评估和重新评估的仪器包括视觉模拟量表、数字分类量表、麦吉尔疼痛问卷和 SF-36 生活质量评估问卷。在开始治疗前、治疗结束后 1 周、1、3 和 6 个月进行评估。

结果

TUS 和 IA 在降低临床疼痛和通过研究参与者的分析变量改善生活质量方面均有效。两组之间无显著差异。

局限性

缺乏盲法;排除患有合并症和其他 CPP 病因的女性、缺乏安慰剂组、两种技术所用治疗次数的差异,以及 COVID-19 疫情。

结论

TUS 和 IA 治疗 CPP 继发 AMPS 可有效减轻临床疼痛,提高生活质量。

临床试验注册号

我们声明该临床试验已于 2018 年 7 月 18 日在巴西临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为[(ReBEC) no. RBR-39czsv]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b88/9344777/76b4a8247d94/12905_2022_1910_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验