Janz N K, Becker M H, Kirscht J P, Eraker S A, Billi J E, Woolliscroft J O
Am J Public Health. 1987 Jul;77(7):805-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.7.805.
We examined the ability of a provider-initiated, minimal-contact intervention to modify the smoking behavior of ambulatory clinic patients. Smokers at two outpatient sites were assigned to one of three groups: provider intervention only (PI); provider intervention plus self-help manual (PI/M); and usual care (control) group (C). The physician message emphasized the patient's personal susceptibility, the physician's concern, and the patient's ability to quit (self-efficacy). The nurse consultation concentrated on benefits and barriers associated with stopping, and on strategies for cessation. Telephone interviews were conducted with the 250 participants within a few days of their clinic visit and again at one and six months. Both PI and PI/M proved to be superior to usual care in motivating attempts to quit at both one-month and six-month follow-ups, and logistic regression analyses indicated that participants receiving the self-help manual in addition to the health provider message were between two and three times more likely to quit smoking during the study period than were participants in either of the other study groups.
我们研究了一种由医护人员发起的、低接触式干预措施改变门诊患者吸烟行为的能力。两个门诊地点的吸烟者被分为三组之一:仅医护人员干预组(PI);医护人员干预加自助手册组(PI/M);以及常规护理(对照)组(C)。医生传达的信息强调了患者的个人易感性、医生的关切以及患者的戒烟能力(自我效能感)。护士咨询则集中在与戒烟相关的益处和障碍以及戒烟策略上。在250名参与者就诊后的几天内、1个月和6个月时分别进行了电话访谈。在1个月和6个月的随访中,PI组和PI/M组在促使戒烟尝试方面均被证明优于常规护理,逻辑回归分析表明,除了医护人员的信息外还收到自助手册的参与者在研究期间戒烟的可能性是其他两个研究组参与者的两到三倍。