• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SARS-CoV-2 唾液抗原检测诊断性能的研究:一项荟萃分析。

Investigation of the diagnostic performance of the SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022 Dec;55(6 Pt 1):1084-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmii.2022.07.003
PMID:35922266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9287583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Rapid identification and isolation of patients with COVID-19 are critical strategies to contain COVID-19. The saliva antigen test has the advantages of noninvasiveness and decreased transmission risk to health-care professionals. This meta-analysis investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the saliva antigen test for SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Biomed Central. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of saliva antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 were included. The data of the included studies were used to construct a 2 × 2 table on a per patient basis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of saliva antigen tests were determined using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Nine studies enrolling 9842 patients were included. The meta-analysis generated a pooled sensitivity of 65.3% and a pooled specificity of 99.7%. A subgroup analysis of the studies performing the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for participants from airports and public health centers revealed a pooled sensitivity of 93.6%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the saliva antigen test performed using CLEIA exhibited higher sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the saliva antigen test performed using CLEIA might be an effective and noninvasive screening tool for SARS-CoV-2.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行是由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的。快速识别和隔离 COVID-19 患者是遏制 COVID-19 的关键策略。唾液抗原检测具有非侵入性和降低对医护人员传播风险的优点。本荟萃分析调查了 SARS-CoV-2 唾液抗原检测的诊断准确性。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Biomed Central 中搜索了相关研究。纳入评估 SARS-CoV-2 唾液抗原检测诊断准确性的研究。使用基于患者的 2×2 表对纳入研究的数据进行构建。使用双变量随机效应模型确定唾液抗原检测的总敏感性和特异性。

结果

纳入了 9 项共 9842 名患者的研究。荟萃分析得出的唾液抗原检测的合并敏感性为 65.3%,特异性为 99.7%。对来自机场和公共卫生中心的参与者进行化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA)的研究进行亚组分析,发现合并敏感性为 93.6%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,使用 CLEIA 进行的唾液抗原检测对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测具有更高的敏感性。因此,使用 CLEIA 进行的唾液抗原检测可能是 SARS-CoV-2 的一种有效且非侵入性的筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/bc7e783fc978/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/735557d72a80/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/9cfc375e0c8f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/bc7e783fc978/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/735557d72a80/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/9cfc375e0c8f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa7/9287583/bc7e783fc978/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigation of the diagnostic performance of the SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test: A meta-analysis.SARS-CoV-2 唾液抗原检测诊断性能的研究:一项荟萃分析。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022 Dec;55(6 Pt 1):1084-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in the pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童人群中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2023 May;64(3):247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests for Community Transmission Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区传播筛查中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111451.
4
Assessment of the detection accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis.评估 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测在儿童和青少年中的检测准确性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 Nov 1;86(11):966-974. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000987. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
5
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antigen tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评价 COVID-19 抗原检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 1;84(11):1028-1037. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000626.
6
A novel strategy for SARS-CoV-2 mass screening with quantitative antigen testing of saliva: a diagnostic accuracy study.一种使用唾液定量抗原检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 大规模筛查的新策略:一项诊断准确性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Aug;2(8):e397-e404. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00092-6. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
9
Efficacy and validity of automated quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test from saliva specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19.自动化定量化学发光酶免疫分析法检测唾液样本中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原用于 COVID-19 诊断的功效和有效性。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul;27(7):1039-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Rapid antigen-based and rapid molecular tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid review with network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.基于抗原的快速检测和快速分子检测用于 SARS-CoV-2 的检测:一项针对诊断检测准确性研究的快速综述与网络荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Mar 29;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02810-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 screening tests: a national prospective analysis.新型冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)非侵入性筛查试验的诊断准确性:一项全国性前瞻性分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 21;25(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11088-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2.新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)的快速诊断检测
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):264-272. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2117115. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests: A multi-centre clinical evaluation.七种即时 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒的准确性和易用性:一项多中心临床评估。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103774. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
Clinical evaluation of the SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen rapid test with symptomatic and asymptomatic, non-hospitalized patients.
SD 生物传感器 SARS-CoV-2 唾液抗原快速检测对有症状和无症状、非住院患者的临床评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 22;16(12):e0260894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260894. eCollection 2021.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests for Community Transmission Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区传播筛查中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111451.
5
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antigen tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评价 COVID-19 抗原检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 1;84(11):1028-1037. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000626.
6
Comparison of RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and Antigen Quantification Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、逆转录环介导等温扩增技术(RT-LAMP)和抗原定量检测方法的比较
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2022 May 24;75(3):249-253. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2021.476. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Are rapid antigen SARS-Cov-2 tests effective for mass screening of travelers at airports? The Olympic experience.快速抗原 SARS-CoV-2 检测在机场对旅行者进行大规模筛查是否有效?奥运会的经验。
J Travel Med. 2021 Oct 11;28(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab135.
8
Reduced Relative Sensitivity of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in Saliva Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs.与鼻咽拭子相比,Elecsys SARS-CoV-2抗原检测在唾液中的相对灵敏度降低。
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 10;9(8):1700. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081700.
9
Antigen Testing Every 3 Days Is Highly Sensitive for SARS-CoV-2.每3天进行一次抗原检测对新冠病毒具有高度敏感性。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;326(6):473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12620.
10
Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers.新冠疫苗突破性感染在已接种疫苗的医护人员中发生。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1474-1484. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109072. Epub 2021 Jul 28.