• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生理测量在自动驾驶技术的社会接受度方面的应用。

Physiological measurements in social acceptance of self driving technologies.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):13312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17049-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17049-7
PMID:35922644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349214/
Abstract

The goal of the present study is to examine the cognitive/affective physiological correlates of passenger travel experience in autonomously driven transportation systems. We investigated the social acceptance and cognitive aspects of self-driving technology by measuring physiological responses in real-world experimental settings using eye-tracking and EEG measures simultaneously on 38 volunteers. A typical test run included human-driven (Human) and Autonomous conditions in the same vehicle, in a safe environment. In the spectrum analysis of the eye-tracking data we found significant differences in the complex patterns of eye movements: the structure of movements of different magnitudes were less variable in the Autonomous drive condition. EEG data revealed less positive affectivity in the Autonomous condition compared to the human-driven condition while arousal did not differ between the two conditions. These preliminary findings reinforced our initial hypothesis that passenger experience in human and machine navigated conditions entail different physiological and psychological correlates, and those differences are accessible using state of the art in-world measurements. These useful dimensions of passenger experience may serve as a source of information both for the improvement and design of self-navigating technology and for market-related concerns.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨自主驾驶交通系统中乘客旅行体验的认知/情感生理相关性。我们通过在真实实验环境中同时使用眼动追踪和 EEG 测量来测量生理反应,研究了自动驾驶技术的社会接受度和认知方面,共有 38 名志愿者参与了测试。在典型的测试运行中,同一辆车内包括人类驾驶(Human)和自动驾驶(Autonomous)两种模式,且处于安全环境中。在眼动追踪数据的频谱分析中,我们发现眼球运动的复杂模式存在显著差异:在自动驾驶模式下,不同幅度运动的结构变化较小。与人类驾驶模式相比,自动驾驶模式下的 EEG 数据显示出较低的积极情感,而两种模式下的唤醒程度没有差异。这些初步发现证实了我们的初始假设,即人类和机器导航条件下的乘客体验涉及不同的生理和心理相关性,并且可以使用最新的现场测量技术来获取这些差异。这些有用的乘客体验维度可以为自动驾驶技术的改进和设计以及市场相关问题提供信息来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a52/9349214/dcf76b17909c/41598_2022_17049_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a52/9349214/195ac3b375d3/41598_2022_17049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a52/9349214/dcf76b17909c/41598_2022_17049_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a52/9349214/195ac3b375d3/41598_2022_17049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a52/9349214/dcf76b17909c/41598_2022_17049_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Physiological measurements in social acceptance of self driving technologies.生理测量在自动驾驶技术的社会接受度方面的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):13312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17049-7.
2
Get Ready for Being Chauffeured : Passenger's Preferences and Trust While Being Driven by Human and Automation.准备好被驾驶:乘客在被人类和自动化驾驶时的偏好和信任。
Hum Factors. 2020 Dec;62(8):1322-1338. doi: 10.1177/0018720819872893. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.考虑车辆运动状态和乘客生理特征的车辆乘客舒适性研究:提高自动驾驶车辆的乘客舒适性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186821.
4
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.密切关注:在高度自动驾驶过程中,注视行为作为衡量自动化信任度的指标
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving.驾驶时注意力评估方法的评价。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Bicyclist-evoked arousal and greater attention to bicyclists independently promote safer driving.自行车骑行者引起的觉醒和对自行车骑行者的更多关注,均可独立促进更安全的驾驶。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Oct 21;6(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00332-y.
7
The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self-Driving Cars.驾驶普通汽车时的情感影响对自动驾驶汽车的感知和接受度的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):358-374. doi: 10.1111/risa.13267. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Evaluating In-Car Movements in the Design of Mindful Commute Interventions: Exploratory Study.在正念通勤干预设计中评估车内活动:探索性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 4;19(12):e372. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6983.
9
Advanced vehicle technologies and road safety: A scoping review of the evidence.先进车辆技术与道路安全:证据范围综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Nov;147:105741. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105741. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.日益自动化的车辆对人类驾驶员的挑战。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):310-328. doi: 10.1177/0018720819900402. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Passenger physiology in self-driving vehicles during unexpected events.意外事件期间自动驾驶车辆中的乘客生理状况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81960-4.
2
The leading role of personality in concerns about autonomous vehicles.人格在自动驾驶汽车相关问题中的主导作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 5;19(6):e0301895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301895. eCollection 2024.
3
Emotion-Attention Interaction in the Right Hemisphere.右半球的情绪-注意力交互作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review.公众对自动驾驶汽车的接受度与认知:全面综述
AI Ethics. 2021;1(3):355-387. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Emotion-Attention Interaction in the Right Hemisphere.右半球的情绪-注意力交互作用。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 29;11(8):1006. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081006.
3
Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, a Potential Biomarker for the Effect of Neuromodulation on Brain's Affective Circuitry-Preliminary Evidence from a Deep Brain Stimulation Study.
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 29;11(8):1006. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081006.
额部阿尔法不对称性,一种神经调节对大脑情感回路影响的潜在生物标志物——来自一项深部脑刺激研究的初步证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 4;11:584. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00584. eCollection 2017.
4
On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence.不对称额皮质活动在趋近和退缩动机中的作用:对证据的最新综述。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jan;55(1). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12879. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
5
Multi-Sensor Based State Prediction for Personal Mobility Vehicles.基于多传感器的个人移动车辆状态预测
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0162593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162593. eCollection 2016.
6
Stress Assessment by Prefrontal Relative Gamma.通过前额叶相对伽马进行压力评估。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2016 Sep 22;10:101. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00101. eCollection 2016.
7
Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS).介绍开放式情感标准化图像集(OASIS)。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):457-470. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3.
8
Haptic perceptual intent in quiet standing affects multifractal scaling of postural fluctuations.安静站立时的触觉感知意图会影响姿势波动的多重分形标度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1808-18. doi: 10.1037/a0037247. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
9
Fractal fluctuations in quiet standing predict the use of mechanical information for haptic perception.静立位时的分形波动可预测触觉感知中对机械信息的使用。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;41(8):1625-34. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0706-1. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in matlab.Matlab中多重分形去趋势波动分析简介
Front Physiol. 2012 Jun 4;3:141. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00141. eCollection 2012.